These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Megathron redesign

First post First post
Author
Skippermonkey
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#41 - 2012-10-08 16:15:42 UTC
Inquisitor Kitchner wrote:
They could spend their time doing something useful, like drawing a magnificent portrait of myself to hang in my Captain's Quarters.

I'd like the option to project my face onto the surface of a moon with an orbital laser device :3

COME AT ME BRO

I'LL JUST BE DOCKED IN THIS STATION

Inquisitor Kitchner
The Executives
#42 - 2012-10-08 16:17:24 UTC
Nalha Saldana wrote:

Its not about pretty/ugly, thats a matter of personal opinion. I bet that CCP have a list of outdated models that they take care of in the right order.



Then if they are updating models based off a spreadsheet instead of what EVE players think looks bad then my original comment stands Cool

"If an injury has to be done to a man it should be so severe that his vengeance need not be feared." - Niccolo Machiavelli

Nalha Saldana
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#43 - 2012-10-08 16:20:19 UTC
Inquisitor Kitchner wrote:
Nalha Saldana wrote:

Its not about pretty/ugly, thats a matter of personal opinion. I bet that CCP have a list of outdated models that they take care of in the right order.



Then if they are updating models based off a spreadsheet instead of what EVE players think looks bad then my original comment stands Cool


Replacing the ones with bad textures and polygons is way more important then what a few players wine on the forums about.
Asuka Solo
I N E X T R E M I S
Tactical Narcotics Team
#44 - 2012-10-08 16:38:10 UTC
It looks to me like a sleek redesign.... kind of like the new old porche for next year.....

Begs the question tho.... why is CCP fixing stuff that wasn't broke.....

Eve is about Capital ships, WiS, Boobs, PI and Isk!

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#45 - 2012-10-08 16:40:44 UTC
Asuka Solo wrote:
It looks to me like a sleek redesign.... kind of like the new old porche for next year.....

Begs the question tho.... why is CCP fixing stuff that wasn't broke.....

Because the art department works on graphics that need updating, not bug fixes.

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#46 - 2012-10-08 16:43:37 UTC
Inquisitor Kitchner wrote:
Inquisitor Kitchner wrote:
Thank god CCP are addressing the real issues that face EVE players today.


Roll Sizzle Beef wrote:


Because the art department are all programers...


War Kitten wrote:


Yes, CCP, get those artists working coding changes ASAP!

Put the accountants and GMs on it too. Hell, get the night janitor involved as well.


Alexa Coates wrote:

oh my ******* god damn ccp is more than one person, they can do multiple ******* things.

get this through your head you fucksticks.



And which one of you three logged onto EVE last, saw a Megthron/Vindicator and went "Jesus christ that ship is ugly, it needs a redesign" and which of you went "Oh, it's a Megathron"?

They could spend their time doing something useful, like drawing a magnificent portrait of myself to hang in my Captain's Quarters.


You have to admit, it's a big improvement.

I suppose you could Fraps yourself doing "things" in the Captains Quarters and then play them on the big screen? Smile

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.

Unsuccessful At Everything
The Troll Bridge
#47 - 2012-10-08 16:55:48 UTC
I approve of new Megathron. Now CCP...put the Thorax on Extense and make it beefier!

Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings?

Jada Maroo
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#48 - 2012-10-08 17:08:31 UTC
I think it's pretty safe to assume the Dominix and Typhoon are high on the to-remodel list. CCP seems to be taking a hard look at the ugly-for-ugly's sake or low poly ship designs. To their credit they are creating a lot of new ships in this release.

4x new destroyers
ORE mining frigate
Megathron
Tempest
Stabber
Imicus (this hasn't been talked about much but is coming)
Heron - this makes me wonder if they aren't planning on redoing all exploration frigate models, Probe and Magnate included, but they haven't said anything yet
Punisher? I think I read somewhere this model is being remade or touched up
Incursus? Same. Apparently has a shorter antenna on the new design

I'm almost certain they're working on a new Rifter as well. I forget where I read it, but it's rattling around my memory.
Bigpimping
Pimp Inc.
#49 - 2012-10-08 17:10:51 UTC
Looks like they've slightly pressed on its top, flattening it out a bit.

But also, a single hard-point on its sexy curves?!?! Why would you do this?
Bigpimping
Pimp Inc.
#50 - 2012-10-08 17:16:33 UTC
I do like the new model, however, are there meant to be three number 8 hard-points?

Does the second 7th one sit on the corresponding site on the far side of the hull, or has the bottom point been incorrectly labeled?

Vertisce Soritenshi
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#51 - 2012-10-08 17:19:33 UTC
Megathron has never been a good looking ship for me. I don't understand what people see in it. That's just me. If anything is high on their redesign list it should be most if not all of the Minmatar line of ships followed by the vast majority of Caldari frigs and cruisers. In all seriousness some of these look like some guys bad crack dream. Minmatar ships have very few good looking ones if you ask me. Not including the new Tornado I would say the only two I really like are the Rifter and Hurricane.

Bounties for all! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2279821#post2279821

Mars Theran
Foreign Interloper
#52 - 2012-10-08 17:26:39 UTC
Nalha Saldana wrote:
So CCP posted a pic of the Megathron redesign on facebook, what is different on this one compared to old?

http://a2.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/200886_10151190189914394_1480317101_o.jpg


It's smoother. If they really want to improve that things look, I'd say bump the bridge up a ways and give it some depth. Always thought the Mega looked a bit absurd; it still does if this pic is any indication. What is it with Gallente and shoes anyway?
zubzubzubzubzubzubzubzub
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
#53 - 2012-10-08 17:34:43 UTC
Here's a WAG:

It's prep work for the tessellation upgrades. There are flaws in the original model which meant that it wouldn't work. So they reworked the base model, the bump maps and the textures.


That is a WAG though.

Woo! CSM XI!

Fuzzwork Enterprises

Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter

Mars Theran
Foreign Interloper
#54 - 2012-10-08 17:38:19 UTC
Steve Ronuken wrote:
Here's a WAG:

It's prep work for the tessellation upgrades. There are flaws in the original model which meant that it wouldn't work. So they reworked the base model, the bump maps and the textures.


That is a WAG though.



What is a WAG?
zubzubzubzubzubzubzubzub
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
#55 - 2012-10-08 17:39:55 UTC
Mars Theran wrote:
Steve Ronuken wrote:
Here's a WAG:

It's prep work for the tessellation upgrades. There are flaws in the original model which meant that it wouldn't work. So they reworked the base model, the bump maps and the textures.


That is a WAG though.



What is a WAG?


Wild Ass Guess.

Woo! CSM XI!

Fuzzwork Enterprises

Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter

Jace Errata
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#56 - 2012-10-08 17:40:17 UTC
Mars Theran wrote:
Steve Ronuken wrote:
Here's a WAG:

It's prep work for the tessellation upgrades. There are flaws in the original model which meant that it wouldn't work. So they reworked the base model, the bump maps and the textures.


That is a WAG though.



What is a WAG?

Wibbly Astronaut Garters Wild Ass Guess.

tweeten

One day they woke me up so I could live forever

It's such a shame the same will never happen to you

Roll Sizzle Beef
Space Mutiny
#57 - 2012-10-08 17:42:44 UTC
Mars Theran wrote:

What is a WAG?

http://www.acronymfinder.com/WAG.html
Daneel Trevize
Give my 11percent back
#58 - 2012-10-08 17:44:30 UTC  |  Edited by: Daneel Trevize
Look, it shouldn't be in any way able to be confused for frowning and it certainly shouldn't get a fat arse/gut.

It's the blaster gunboat, looking up at it from your hanger it should be a wall or cliff of as much firepower as is possible to cram into a 'economical' battleship design as possible. There is no excess size or mass to the design, except where it would allow moar damage, thus the front end is a chiseled wedge or pair of horns. If it doesn't look like it could be agile enough to turn and bring a fearsome gundeck to bear on you/sink it's teeth into you should you stray too close, you're doing it wrong.

And while it may be organic it's also a space ship, if the more minor thrusters need to be somewhat away from the main bulk to function efficiently, they're fine being in thin nacelles rather than absorbed into an amorphous blob of a main hull. Equally the underslung drone bay is perfectly fine as is.
Extra parts should look like limbs/organs rather than cancers or bits being tucked in. It need pull its elbows in for no one.

And it certainly shouldn't have bloody sansha/caldari spikes.

In short CCP, bin this bad idea and do some proper work on the caldari hulls. Or a possibly more lightweight dominix, not a fatter Mega.

Edit: Oh and I'm not going to get Facebook or Twitter just to be able to tell you this is bad, or only have the option of liking and sharing it. This is the official forums, that's a bad redesign.
Mars Theran
Foreign Interloper
#59 - 2012-10-08 17:44:31 UTC  |  Edited by: Mars Theran
http://i.imgur.com/sgapA.jpg

Forgive the lack of real effort; I used Paint, and it really doesn't do much. I'd extend that Bridge tower back and down from there, and off the rear of the model as it is now. Sort of a sloping, bridge section with probably a galley looking out off the back.

Here's a few red lines to help; sorry, not much of an artist anymore.

http://i.imgur.com/Lwekf.jpg
zubzubzubzubzubzubzubzub
Mars Theran
Foreign Interloper
#60 - 2012-10-08 17:45:12 UTC
Roll Sizzle Beef wrote:
Mars Theran wrote:

What is a WAG?

http://www.acronymfinder.com/WAG.html


I'll WAG it's the second one.
zubzubzubzubzubzubzubzub