These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE New Citizens Q&A

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123Next page
 

New players, do yourself a favour, read the new dev blog re: AI

First post
Author
Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor
#21 - 2012-10-02 08:44:58 UTC  |  Edited by: Mara Rinn
If you are losing drones to sleepers, perhaps you are not using enough EWAR. Sleepers and Sanshas alike use the Level One AI which hates EWAR and logistics. So fit some ECM, neuts, sensor dampeners, tracking disruptors, anything active that you can use against the NPCs to increase their hate for you.

With the new AI, flying in groups with more experienced pilots will be even more rewarding if you pick the right pilot to fly with.
Matt Grav
Wrath of the Pea
#22 - 2012-10-02 11:26:46 UTC
New players, do yourself a favour, don't listen to the OP !!

To the OP: we get it, you don't like the fact that the NPC will switch to attacking your drones. The point is that they always should have done in the first place.

You'll now have to manage your drones and replace the ones that you do lose. The rest of us have to deal with continually buying ammo and all of the ewar effects that the NPC throw at us.

The new AI is not going to be the sleeper AI, it's a reduced variant of it. Anyway, even if it was Sleeper AI loads of other people appear to successfully use drones against them.
ISD Athechu
ISD STAR
ISD Alliance
#23 - 2012-10-02 12:53:18 UTC  |  Edited by: ISD Athechu
Hia Fokes, So I'm going to say this only ONCE. The forums are a place to talk get to know people exchange ideas and feelings. This does NOT mean that it is a licence to slander others regardless of how right or how appropriate it might be in whatever situation that comes up. You can disagree with what someone says but do it in a constructive way that is appropriate and not "This is *&()&*^*%&*%$*(&%^)%^(*%^&*(^(^)$^&^$*%*$(&$^&(%#^$#*%@(*^()@^)(^)!(^()!#)#_(*&%_*!#^%)!#^%!()#^)!@#%^!" You get my meaning.....

I have seen a few posts which fall under that category and I have/will remove them. If you disagree with something that someone says explain why and give tips on how to help out the new players on how to avoid losing drones. This is the section for to help and exchange ideas.

I really dislike locking threads but if this continues with the name calling and such I will lock this one and report the offenders to the appropriate people.

I will be watching ShockedTwisted

Thanks for understanding.

ISD Athechu

STAR Executive

EVE New Citizens Q&A Resources

Helping Players Since 2011

Keno Skir
#24 - 2012-10-02 13:49:43 UTC
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:
Do not believe the people posting mis-information in this thread. I too have also lived in wh's for a long time, and have run Incursions. I am intimately aware of how the Sleeper/Incursion AI works. ANY introduction of this AI to missions will mean you will lose drones, a TON of drones.


This is only true if you are poo at drone control. For everyone else, enjoy the new AI it should make things more real and more fun.
Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
#25 - 2012-10-02 15:40:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Dinsdale Pirannha
J'Poll wrote:

The only one spreading mis-information is you.

Went on the test server and ran some missions with new AI, and after two houts of testing lost not one drone. Just pay attention to your drones and recall them when the get aggro.

I just sense an OP who whines cause he soon cant AFK mossion in his Domi.
I say NPC must be made even harder.


ISD, can you please ban people who post outright lies?
This joker can't even lie well.

Duality is not up, nor has it been up for some time, so this comment of his is a provable falsehood.
Oh, and here is the link, with confirmation from CCP Goliath:

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=159401

Of course, this is the modus operandi of the people who want to wipe out high sec.
ISD Athechu
ISD STAR
ISD Alliance
#26 - 2012-10-02 16:14:46 UTC  |  Edited by: ISD Athechu
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:
J'Poll wrote:

The only one spreading mis-information is you.

Went on the test server and ran some missions with new AI, and after two houts of testing lost not one drone. Just pay attention to your drones and recall them when the get aggro.

I just sense an OP who whines cause he soon cant AFK mossion in his Domi.
I say NPC must be made even harder.


ISD, can you please ban people who post outright lies?
This joker can't even lie well.

Duality is not up, nor has it been up for some time, so this comment of his is a provable falsehood.
Oh, and here is the link, with confirmation from CCP Goliath:

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=159401

Of course, this is the modus operandi of the people who want to wipe out high sec.


1) ISD cannot ban from the forums (which has been stated many times) if you have a problem with someone on the forums please file a petition.

2) He did not say duality there is more then 1(one) Test server. As you stated Duality is not up. But there is Buckingham which is online and is the current Public Test Server since Sisi is getting an overhauled. ( See This Dev blog for more information).

3) You started the topic so please don't whine if others are disagreeing with you and you don't like what they are saying. As I said before constructive discussion is what needs to be held not name calling and other nonsense.

I don't mind arguments as long as they are in a civil way. If it gets out of hand I or another forum moderator will put our foot down. Personally I would rather not have that happen. I am very understanding and lax(sometimes) in my moderation but it's all for good arguments or information(both positive and negative information). But if we cannot have nice things then I will just end it.

Consider this the final notice for this thread. Next time I will put a pad lock on it.

For information on Buckingham please look at this URL: http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Buckingham

Edit: made a correction on point 2.

ISD Athechu

STAR Executive

EVE New Citizens Q&A Resources

Helping Players Since 2011

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#27 - 2012-10-02 16:20:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Jonah Gravenstein
^^ Fair mods best mods

On Topic

If you notice your drones are taking damage or have attracted NPC aggro, simply recall them to your drone bay to break the lock the NPCs have on them, you may lose one if you leave it too late or if it's webbed, the drones shields will recharge while they are tucked away safely.

If you're flying a drone boat there is an option to group drones into a "folder" in the drone interface (applies to all ships), right click and add to group/folder in batches of 5 or less, you just right click the "folder" and launch, in a drone boat you will have spares, recall your drones as they start to take damage and just launch the next batch from a "folder" once they're back in the bay. If you're not in a drone boat, recall the drones to break lock, keep hammering away with your primary weapons while your drones shields recharge and relaunch them when ready.

As others have mentioned it's highly likely the new NPC AI will intensely dislike any form or remote repair or electronic warfare, use this to your advantage and maintain the aggro on your ship, it'll help your drones live longer.

Last but not least, feed your drones regularly and keep them warm at night.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Lyric Lahnder
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#28 - 2012-10-02 16:35:26 UTC
In lvl 4 missions I dont give two *****.

Oh no incoming fire at my drones.

Recall sentrys redeploy. Takes roughly 3 seconds, A disruption in my dps I can stand.

This is really only bad for people who tend to send mobile drones out to long ranges and leave them on aggresive. Wich right now is a bad Idea even with the current AI.

Mission Domi FTW new AI be damned.

Noir. and Noir Academy are recruiting apply at www.noirmercs.com I Noir Academy: 60 days old must be able to fly at least one tech II frigate. I Noir. Recruits: 4:1 k/d ratio and can fly tech II cruisers.

Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
#29 - 2012-10-02 16:42:45 UTC
I would love to see what the replies would be in CCP decided to halve the falloff on autocannons. I imagine all the people gloating about the destruction of drones as a viable platform would be singing a vastly different tune.

For what's it worth, I have perfect skills (OK, only level IV in specialization) in all weapons systems, so I can switch to a Vargur or Mach with relative ease.

But any new players WILL be hammered hugely by this obliteration of drones.
And as for those suggesting putting EWAR on the mission boats, most boats simply don't have the capability, and new pilots CERTAINLY don't have the skills to adjust, even if the boat had the slots to accommodate.

Bottom line, there will be many many tears when this attack hits TQ.
But that is precisely what a specific group within the Eve player base and CCP want.
Moondancer Starweaver
Hideaway Hunters
The Hideaway.
#30 - 2012-10-02 17:04:53 UTC
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:
I would love to see what the replies would be in CCP decided to halve the falloff on autocannons. I imagine all the people gloating about the destruction of drones as a viable platform would be singing a vastly different tune.

For what's it worth, I have perfect skills (OK, only level IV in specialization) in all weapons systems, so I can switch to a Vargur or Mach with relative ease.

But any new players WILL be hammered hugely by this obliteration of drones.
And as for those suggesting putting EWAR on the mission boats, most boats simply don't have the capability, and new pilots CERTAINLY don't have the skills to adjust, even if the boat had the slots to accommodate.

Bottom line, there will be many many tears when this attack hits TQ.
But that is precisely what a specific group within the Eve player base and CCP want.


Why would CCP and eve player base want to hammer as you put it new players? I am very new so don't really know much about much but it seems like bad business to try an increase the learning curve for new players.

From what i have read in CCP FoxFour's thread its bringing the AI more in line with the higher end PvE stuff which would at least on the surface lesson the learning curve to get into those higher level (Gonna get the name wrong incursions? Sleeplers?)
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#31 - 2012-10-02 17:06:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Jonah Gravenstein
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:
I would love to see what the replies would be in CCP decided to halve the falloff on autocannons. I imagine all the people gloating about the destruction of drones as a viable platform would be singing a vastly different tune.

For what's it worth, I have perfect skills (OK, only level IV in specialization) in all weapons systems, so I can switch to a Vargur or Mach with relative ease.

But any new players WILL be hammered hugely by this obliteration of drones.
And as for those suggesting putting EWAR on the mission boats, most boats simply don't have the capability, and new pilots CERTAINLY don't have the skills to adjust, even if the boat had the slots to accommodate.

Bottom line, there will be many many tears when this attack hits TQ.
But that is precisely what a specific group within the Eve player base and CCP want.



Target Painter, it's ewar and currently sleepers hate you for them, small shield or armour reps in the utility high for repairing your drones, sleepers hate those as well. As the new AI is going to be watered down sleeper/incursion AI it's pretty certain that mission NPCs will react in the same way to them, ie aggro you for using them.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
#32 - 2012-10-02 17:41:03 UTC  |  Edited by: ISD Athechu
Moondancer Starweaver wrote:
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:
I would love to see what the replies would be in CCP decided to halve the falloff on autocannons. I imagine all the people gloating about the destruction of drones as a viable platform would be singing a vastly different tune.

For what's it worth, I have perfect skills (OK, only level IV in specialization) in all weapons systems, so I can switch to a Vargur or Mach with relative ease.

But any new players WILL be hammered hugely by this obliteration of drones.
And as for those suggesting putting EWAR on the mission boats, most boats simply don't have the capability, and new pilots CERTAINLY don't have the skills to adjust, even if the boat had the slots to accommodate.

Bottom line, there will be many many tears when this attack hits TQ.
But that is precisely what a specific group within the Eve player base and CCP want.


Why would CCP and eve player base want to hammer as you put it new players? I am very new so don't really know much about much but it seems like bad business to try an increase the learning curve for new players.

From what i have read in CCP FoxFour's thread its bringing the AI more in line with the higher end PvE stuff which would at least on the surface lesson the learning curve to get into those higher level (Gonna get the name wrong incursions? Sleeplers?)


You are as you said, new.

And as you said, from a business perspective, it certainly does not seem to make sense to attack the new player base.

But read the forums carefully. You will see that there is a small, but extremely influential group that are bent on wiping high sec (the new player's best base) from the game. The CSM, which is made up of Eve players, is supposed to represent the Eve players best interests when dealing with CCP. It is made up of 14 people, with I believe 5 of them alternates. Of that 14, two, yes TWO, supposedly represent high sec. The majority come from the null sec alliances, and many many in the null sec alliances hate high sec with an unrelenting passion.

Do you own reading on the forums. Many of the null sec zealots post that high sec should be abolished completely. Attacks on drones in a PVE setting is just another step towards that.

And the other thing is PVE in Incursions is a group effort, as are most profitable Sleeper sites.
Mission running is typically most profitable running solo.

So while I see the point of "getting used to the AI" would seem to have merit, in fact, the two styles have very, very little in common.You learn about fitting a ship for tanking and DPS in missions, and that much can be transferred to Sleeper/Incursions. But that is about it.

My days running flying a logistics boat against Pandemic Legion in null sec taught me more about fighting Incursion rats than anything else.

This attack on drones is merely another attack on high sec play, specifically high sec solo play, in an effort to crush high sec income.

Rule 29/30 Violation edited post- ISD Athechu
Kestutis Fujika
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#33 - 2012-10-02 18:04:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Kestutis Fujika
I wish ccp would add ability to shoot the guns ,make them similar to sentry's or something like that and that you cant move then you are using them (dont forget sentry's are stationar) or add extra targeting time then you are moving ( T2 heavy are really slow and need to get up close to fight) and then you do emergence warp out you would leave server turrets behind and also lets I wonder what would gunners would say to such update. If they do that they can add drone ammo or fuel or what ever other time ammo analog
Mathrin
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#34 - 2012-10-02 18:36:30 UTC
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:
Do not believe the people posting mis-information in this thread. I too have also lived in wh's for a long time, and have run Incursions. I am intimately aware of how the Sleeper/Incursion AI works. ANY introduction of this AI to missions will mean you will lose drones, a TON of drones.

The Vexor and Myrmidon, forget it them as viable mission boats. The Domi and Ishtar, if you only use Sentries, well, they will survive, but your DPS is so heavily hammered that there is no point in using the ship. Plus, when using sentries, you will have to stay within 2,000 metres of them. That means speed-tanking a site while letting your drones kill is no longer a viable option.

I encourage all of you to test this on the Duality server as soon as it is up and running again, then post your grievances on the GD forum, here, and of course in the new features testing forum.

Scream loud, scream long, scream everywhere.

Oh, and of course, it has been immensely convenient that apparently that the only person reporting how easy this AI is on drones is the person who built the AI. Supposedly Fox Four is running missions without any problems, but CCP just can't seem to get Duality up and running for everyone else to test this and prove her wrong.



Alright new people listen up. There are many ways to do level 4 missions. One method involves getting a very tanky ship making all the mission rats shoot you. Then you launch your drones and set them to attack anything thats attacks you. Then you go do something for 10 minutes, come back and do it for the next mission. OP leads me to believe this is what he does. Rats now will go, "Oi this guy won't die and ain't even shooting! Ima attack these little buggers killing me...". If you aren't there to manage drones now they will pop.

Take this lession away newbies. In eve you must learn to adapt to the situation or die.
Moondancer Starweaver
Hideaway Hunters
The Hideaway.
#35 - 2012-10-02 18:48:04 UTC
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:


You are as you said, new.

And as you said, from a business perspective, it certainly does not seem to make sense to attack the new player base.

But read the forums carefully. You will see that there is a small, but extremely influential group that are bent on wiping high sec (the new player's best base) from the game. The CSM, which is made up of Eve players, is supposed to represent the Eve players best interests when dealing with CCP. It is made up of 14 people, with I believe 5 of them alternates. Of that 14, two, yes TWO, supposedly represent high sec. The majority come from the null sec alliances, and many many in the null sec alliances hate high sec with an unrelenting passion.

Do you own reading on the forums. Many of the null sec zealots post that high sec should be abolished completely. Attacks on drones in a PVE setting is just another step towards that.

And the other thing is PVE in Incursions is a group effort, as are most profitable Sleeper sites.
Mission running is typically most profitable running solo.

So while I see the point of "getting used to the AI" would seem to have merit, in fact, the two styles have very, very little in common.You learn about fitting a ship for tanking and DPS in missions, and that much can be transferred to Sleeper/Incursions. But that is about it.

My days running flying a logistics boat against Pandemic Legion in null sec taught me more about fighting Incursion rats than anything else.

This attack on drones is merely another attack on high sec play, specifically high sec solo play, in an effort to crush high sec income.

Rule 29/30 Violation edited post- ISD Athechu


So i am pretty confused by your post now the underlying point seems to be that if things change in high sec its at the behest of a small minority that is posting on the forums that for some reason hate high sec.

The way i have seen it and was explained to me by a friend in terms of a game i do understand Magic the gathering.

High sec is like the standard format its relatively safe and balanced and if things get out of hand they ban something. Most tournaments are run in the standard format.

Low Sec is like Modern/extended format Still fairly controlled but with more nasty tools and ways to break the game. Least amount of tournaments run in this format.

Null Sec is like Legacy/Vintage format No holds barred you can die before you even finish drawing your opener. Has the least amount of banned cards and they look for reasons to unban cards. Very popular but not as popular as standard in tournaments.

In magic we accept that the formats are going to change every 3 months and have to adapt. In eve we accept that the game is going to change every 6 months? and have to adapt. This seems much less likely of an attack on the format as a things have changed adapt.

I rambled and am not sure it made sense but it seems like a "the sky is falling" before it has actually fell.
J'Poll
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#36 - 2012-10-02 18:57:51 UTC
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:
I would love to see what the replies would be in CCP decided to halve the falloff on autocannons. I imagine all the people gloating about the destruction of drones as a viable platform would be singing a vastly different tune.

For what's it worth, I have perfect skills (OK, only level IV in specialization) in all weapons systems, so I can switch to a Vargur or Mach with relative ease.

But any new players WILL be hammered hugely by this obliteration of drones.
And as for those suggesting putting EWAR on the mission boats, most boats simply don't have the capability, and new pilots CERTAINLY don't have the skills to adjust, even if the boat had the slots to accommodate.

Bottom line, there will be many many tears when this attack hits TQ.
But that is precisely what a specific group within the Eve player base and CCP want.


Everytime CCP changes something. People start whining in advance that it will stop people from joining EVE, yet everyday there are new players joining Rookie Help, so stop whining, people can adapt, if not then EVE might not be the game for them.

And as for new players:

New players = frigates, destroyers and maybe the odd crusiers. Outside the Gallente race ships, those thing hardly carry drones at all.

And new players that joined EVE, didn't know how it used to be so they will learn with the new mechanic and never knew it used to be different.

Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy

Help channel: Help chat - Reloaded

Public roams channels: RvB Ganked / Redemption Road / Spectre Fleet / Bombers bar / The Content Club

Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
#37 - 2012-10-02 19:05:07 UTC
Moondancer Starweaver wrote:
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:


You are as you said, new.

And as you said, from a business perspective, it certainly does not seem to make sense to attack the new player base.

But read the forums carefully. You will see that there is a small, but extremely influential group that are bent on wiping high sec (the new player's best base) from the game. The CSM, which is made up of Eve players, is supposed to represent the Eve players best interests when dealing with CCP. It is made up of 14 people, with I believe 5 of them alternates. Of that 14, two, yes TWO, supposedly represent high sec. The majority come from the null sec alliances, and many many in the null sec alliances hate high sec with an unrelenting passion.

Do you own reading on the forums. Many of the null sec zealots post that high sec should be abolished completely. Attacks on drones in a PVE setting is just another step towards that.

And the other thing is PVE in Incursions is a group effort, as are most profitable Sleeper sites.
Mission running is typically most profitable running solo.

So while I see the point of "getting used to the AI" would seem to have merit, in fact, the two styles have very, very little in common.You learn about fitting a ship for tanking and DPS in missions, and that much can be transferred to Sleeper/Incursions. But that is about it.

My days running flying a logistics boat against Pandemic Legion in null sec taught me more about fighting Incursion rats than anything else.

This attack on drones is merely another attack on high sec play, specifically high sec solo play, in an effort to crush high sec income.

Rule 29/30 Violation edited post- ISD Athechu


So i am pretty confused by your post now the underlying point seems to be that if things change in high sec its at the behest of a small minority that is posting on the forums that for some reason hate high sec.

The way i have seen it and was explained to me by a friend in terms of a game i do understand Magic the gathering.

High sec is like the standard format its relatively safe and balanced and if things get out of hand they ban something. Most tournaments are run in the standard format.

Low Sec is like Modern/extended format Still fairly controlled but with more nasty tools and ways to break the game. Least amount of tournaments run in this format.

Null Sec is like Legacy/Vintage format No holds barred you can die before you even finish drawing your opener. Has the least amount of banned cards and they look for reasons to unban cards. Very popular but not as popular as standard in tournaments.

In magic we accept that the formats are going to change every 3 months and have to adapt. In eve we accept that the game is going to change every 6 months? and have to adapt. This seems much less likely of an attack on the format as a things have changed adapt.

I rambled and am not sure it made sense but it seems like a "the sky is falling" before it has actually fell.


The point is that when things change, they are supposed to impact all players, and should change for a good reason.

This change is targeted at drone users and low/null sec plexers. If the low / null sec plexers were going to get hammered equally as much as high sec, I could almost live with the change. But read the dev blog (40 plus pages now) and read the dev's comments. Things are being altered to save the null sec income. Only the solo high sec mission runners, which most new players use as a major source of income, are going to be seriously affected by this attack.
J'Poll
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#38 - 2012-10-02 19:17:36 UTC
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:
J'Poll wrote:

The only one spreading mis-information is you.

Went on the test server and ran some missions with new AI, and after two houts of testing lost not one drone. Just pay attention to your drones and recall them when the get aggro.

I just sense an OP who whines cause he soon cant AFK mossion in his Domi.
I say NPC must be made even harder.


ISD, can you please ban people who post outright lies?
This joker can't even lie well.

Duality is not up, nor has it been up for some time, so this comment of his is a provable falsehood.
Oh, and here is the link, with confirmation from CCP Goliath:

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=159401

Of course, this is the modus operandi of the people who want to wipe out high sec.


You are wrong twice in 1 single sentense:

A.) I don't want to wipe out high-sec. High-sec is fine, I often do some level 4 missions there with friends, or an Incursion. I made most of my ISK by trading in high-sec. So why do I want to wipe it out.

B.) You fail to understand what CCP is doing, majorly. They are overhauling NPC AI, not mission rat AI. So all the changes you whine about in missions will ALSO affect the rats in the null-sec belts, the null-sec anomalies and null-sec plexes.

Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy

Help channel: Help chat - Reloaded

Public roams channels: RvB Ganked / Redemption Road / Spectre Fleet / Bombers bar / The Content Club

Dilaro thagriin
Doomheim
#39 - 2012-10-02 19:19:23 UTC
I know i shouldn't feed the troll.

but there are some things that need to be pointed out here.

1) this change is not a 'targetted attack' as mr pirannha has claimed, it is simply there to remove the very stale and static mess that missions have become and make AFK missioning less viable.

2) Any method of playing EvE while you are not at your keyboard is technically a breach of the ToS. 'AFK missioning' is basically botting without external programs.

3) if you are at your keyboard, missioning properly, and using the correct drones for the correct situation, this change will have very little effect.

4) Fleet missioning will be changed slightly by this AI implementation, as you will no longer simply 'send in the tengu' and wait until it has all the rats aggroing it before warping anyone else in.



with the above points stated i'll summarise. Unlike the claims made by mr pirannha, missions will be made more interesting, less scripted and more fun by this change.
Fit the right tank to every ship that is going in and watch for drone aggro.

Droneboats will still be valid for missions. if you know how and when to use each drone class.

-Dilaro
J'Poll
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#40 - 2012-10-02 19:23:40 UTC
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:
Moondancer Starweaver wrote:
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:
I would love to see what the replies would be in CCP decided to halve the falloff on autocannons. I imagine all the people gloating about the destruction of drones as a viable platform would be singing a vastly different tune.

For what's it worth, I have perfect skills (OK, only level IV in specialization) in all weapons systems, so I can switch to a Vargur or Mach with relative ease.

But any new players WILL be hammered hugely by this obliteration of drones.
And as for those suggesting putting EWAR on the mission boats, most boats simply don't have the capability, and new pilots CERTAINLY don't have the skills to adjust, even if the boat had the slots to accommodate.

Bottom line, there will be many many tears when this attack hits TQ.
But that is precisely what a specific group within the Eve player base and CCP want.


Why would CCP and eve player base want to hammer as you put it new players? I am very new so don't really know much about much but it seems like bad business to try an increase the learning curve for new players.

From what i have read in CCP FoxFour's thread its bringing the AI more in line with the higher end PvE stuff which would at least on the surface lesson the learning curve to get into those higher level (Gonna get the name wrong incursions? Sleeplers?)


You are as you said, new.

And as you said, from a business perspective, it certainly does not seem to make sense to attack the new player base.

But read the forums carefully. You will see that there is a small, but extremely influential group that are bent on wiping high sec (the new player's best base) from the game. The CSM, which is made up of Eve players, is supposed to represent the Eve players best interests when dealing with CCP. It is made up of 14 people, with I believe 5 of them alternates. Of that 14, two, yes TWO, supposedly represent high sec. The majority come from the null sec alliances, and many many in the null sec alliances hate high sec with an unrelenting passion.

Do you own reading on the forums. Many of the null sec zealots post that high sec should be abolished completely. Attacks on drones in a PVE setting is just another step towards that.

And the other thing is PVE in Incursions is a group effort, as are most profitable Sleeper sites.
Mission running is typically most profitable running solo.

So while I see the point of "getting used to the AI" would seem to have merit, in fact, the two styles have very, very little in common.You learn about fitting a ship for tanking and DPS in missions, and that much can be transferred to Sleeper/Incursions. But that is about it.

My days running flying a logistics boat against Pandemic Legion in null sec taught me more about fighting Incursion rats than anything else.

This attack on drones is merely another attack on high sec play, specifically high sec solo play, in an effort to crush high sec income.

Rule 29/30 Violation edited post- ISD Athechu



Null-sec doesn't hate high-sec.

Null-sec hates the carebears that want risk-free EVE. That is now EVE, go play any other MMO that hold you by the hand if you want risk free.

And maybe, the CSM made of null-sec people mostly cause those are the people with a heart for the game. A large portion of high-sec people don't really care, are alts, are alts of alts, are alts of alts of alts etc, bots, or just people that don't vote.

If ALL high-sec dwellers would vote, then CSM would be high-sec filled as most characters live in high-sec if you look at player base.

And like said, it does look like null hates high-sec, but they don't they need high-sec for buying and selling stuff. They are fine with high-sec, they hate the carebears that whine about everything that makes EVE more dangerous.

Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy

Help channel: Help chat - Reloaded

Public roams channels: RvB Ganked / Redemption Road / Spectre Fleet / Bombers bar / The Content Club

Previous page123Next page