These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

CONCORD players, CONCORD prison,

Author
Dinamita Tona
The Renegades
#1 - 2012-09-23 17:57:30 UTC

Many things evolved or even completely changed since EVE started. Also many remain same, some may even be considered as obsolete. Empire wars alliances - Privateers, The Orphanage and similar - in their hunger for kills kept most trade hubs and routes insecure and/or non profitable for most criminal activity (suicide runs). After many years, current war mechanics effectively sent most of them into EVE history, however changes did not make empire more safe – just the opposite. For example Goonswarm Federation are now uncontended, as many others.

Before all I want to say that I do not want any change in current flagging, suicide runs, disco ships or any other criminal element.

From my point of view we have some game elements that needs change:
CONCORD – with all ships, fits, modules changes – it has become obsolete
Bounty system – more or less it wasn't working ever


Here is the idea:

Suicide runs are probably most effective way to get good profit in quick time. There is always enough players that travel AFK holding riches in ships cargo. Also catching those that are not AFK, is also great part of game. But, after good kill, CONCORD / players just kill attacker, inflict some security penalty and that's all. Small sacrifice for expensive loot. There is of course 1 month kill right but usually not used.

Lets move EVE world to another level and give players CONCORD options


Technology is already there as shown in faction wars. Of course some tweaks and changes would be needed...

Players working for CONCORD:
- should patrol around trade hubs/routes and engage any criminal activity
- should be able to catch any player with bounty no matter of its current security status (bounty was added when his sec status was low so raising should not effect kill right)
- warning system - we have now intrusion technology, concord players should have similar warning system {maybe also ability to instantly appear in the place of criminal activity in high or low sec}
- should have concord ships with concord modules
they should be tougher with more dps than conventional ships but destroyable
concord modules and ships would be available only to players working for concord
in case of ship destruction, all concord items should be destroyed
- why tougher:
for low sec engagements where one or 2 concord pilots could engage and kill criminals/pirates when outnumbered
- why more dps:
to be able to prevent attacker to kill its target if it survived first salvo
- should be able to arrest criminals


Players with criminal flag

- flagging and its whole mechanics should remain as it is
- instead of giving victim 1 month kill right, that should be now given to CONCORD players
- criminals in pods and ships can be arrested


Arresting and prison

That would be rather new option, but I think it would be great addition to this game, especially if it can be worked with Dust.

Should work as follows:

a)in current mechanics when players make suicide run, ship is destroyed in process but pod is free to go
if there is CONCORD player and he is able to warp scram pod, criminal should be arrested and put in prison ( for every 100 million inflicted loss – 1 day in prison)

b)any criminal flagged player with sec status bellow 0.0 can be arrested while traveling in high and low sec. If CONCORD player successfully warp scram, criminal should have 2 options
to surrender (to be arrested) – ship, modules, implants will be removed and sold for market price and be given to player(s) who arrested him
try to fight/escape – this option would reset lock and scram (would be some info like " criminal was able to make temporary ecm burst that reseted ships locking system"), and then criminal can try to fight or escape – that would not inflict any other flagging and/or security penalty

c)any player with bounty on its head can be arrested and also try to escape
- player who arrested him would receive bounty money
- if he decides to fight and his ship is destroyed, there will be also option to scram his pod
- CONCORD player is not allowed to kill that pod but, if he gets scram on pod it will be arrested
d)prison
- criminals in prison can be hold there according this rules
suicide runs - will remain in prison until he repays whole loss – 1 day – 100 mil
- he pays whole loss and is released immediately
criminal flagged player – will remain in prison until his sec status is back at 0.0 (0.10 status gain per day) – or he can pay according above formula
player with bounty – will be released immediate from prison system without ship and/or modules/cargo/ implants

With DUST in place, there could be also some Prison break actions to be done.


I believe that this would open new, original content to EVE, and make it even more unique.
Merkal Aubauch
V0LTA
OnlyFleets.
#2 - 2012-09-23 19:23:46 UTC
LOL give me overpowerd ship that I can own everyone. If that happend there would be no criminals all of players would fly for a concord ;)
Dinamita Tona
The Renegades
#3 - 2012-09-23 19:30:19 UTC
Merkal Aubauch wrote:
LOL give me overpowerd ship that I can own everyone. If that happend there would be no criminals all of players would fly for a concord ;)


typical, someone who read but does not understand

this ship would not be able to mission with, go 0.0, etc
it would be only for order preservation - nothing more nothing less

on other hand aren't navy or faction ships better than conventional?

i would like to receive constructive comments
ShahFluffers
Ice Fire Warriors
#4 - 2012-09-23 20:04:39 UTC  |  Edited by: ShahFluffers
Obvious "make high-sec totally safe" thread detected. A half baked one too. What?


- all your idea does is encourage the use of alts for suicide ganking and effectively "kill" suicide ganking as a truly viable profession (because no one is going to want to gank a ship worth several billion anymore with their main when they might be "imprisoned" for 10+ days).

- it makes material, ship, and module logistics almost totally safe in high-sec.

- every pirate and PvPer is going to wipe their bounty and grind their sec status up JUST to they can become CONCORD and "confiscate" the ships of the few remaining pirates left. Eventually, everyone will be forced to maintain good sec-status out of fear of losing their ships to the very CONCORD they entrust their security with (that's irony right there!).

Quote:
on other hand aren't navy or faction ships better than conventional?

Only slightly.
Tubrug1
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#5 - 2012-09-23 20:13:17 UTC
Haven't you lot received enough buffs already?
Dinamita Tona
The Renegades
#6 - 2012-09-23 20:58:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Dinamita Tona
ShahFluffers wrote:
Obvious "make high-sec totally safe" thread detected. A half baked one too. What?


- all your idea does is encourage the use of alts for suicide ganking and effectively "kill" suicide ganking as a truly viable profession (because no one is going to want to gank a ship worth several billion anymore with their main when they might be "imprisoned" for 10+ days).


Not really, suicide runs are still there, most people that do suicide runs have at least few mains, and at least few alts that can do same job. But I can understand fear of more risk.


ShahFluffers wrote:

- it makes material, ship, and module logistics almost totally safe in high-sec.


In what way?

ShahFluffers wrote:

- every pirate and PvPer is going to wipe their bounty and grind their sec status up JUST to they can become CONCORD and "confiscate" the ships of the few remaining pirates left. Eventually, everyone will be forced to maintain good sec-status out of fear of losing their ships to the very CONCORD they entrust their security with (that's irony right there!).


You underestimate people.
As everyone are in faction wars, as everyone are in Empire, As everyone are in 0.0.
Every player has his own agenda.

I know at least 20 people that do suicide runs and never drop bellow 0.0 status.
I know at least 100 people that are constantly on -10 and they do not care.

For both groups this wont change anything.
Dinamita Tona
The Renegades
#7 - 2012-09-23 20:58:49 UTC
Tubrug1 wrote:
Haven't you lot received enough buffs already?


Missing point here...
Scatim Helicon
State War Academy
Caldari State
#8 - 2012-09-23 20:59:35 UTC
Wait until we game the system so that all of CONCORD are in fact Goonswarm alts.

Every time you post a WiS thread, Hilmar strangles a kitten.

Dinamita Tona
The Renegades
#9 - 2012-09-23 21:01:49 UTC
Scatim Helicon wrote:
Wait until we game the system so that all of CONCORD are in fact Goonswarm alts.


Well that is only point well taken.
Mars Theran
Foreign Interloper
#10 - 2012-09-23 21:41:38 UTC
Constructively,

Players get Concord ships? Hmm.. maybe if they were Cruisers or Battleships, and significantly less powerful than the Concord ships. Lots of fitting though, and some special stuff like Warp Stabilization, High Warp speeds, and range bonuses. Also, need Concord Lazors.

Also, as you said, they can't be mission running ships? Nah, let them run missions, just give them limited cargo capacity, and make sure the bonuses are not entirely in line with Mission stuff, like above. Doesn't help missions if they get bonuses that are useless in missions. Of course, they might be good at Sleeper sites, but we might need something to replace T3s with soon anyway.

Jail? Ah, yes.. I like this one. Big smile Now we'll finally have a use for WiS. We can make it so players who get caught end up in a cell in WiS, unable to leave until they serve their time, or one of their friends breaks them out. They did say WiS might get some exploration features. Lol

How about we just put an immobilizer on their ships. Cuts targeting speed, velocity, and targeting range, all down by 50% Shocked

Seriously? Nobody is going to take this seriously; least of all CCP I imagine. Funny idea from a certain perspective maybe, but ultimately it would spoil the fun for everybody and really gimp the game in a big way. Not that it's all bad, but that jail thing probably won't go over well. Smile
zubzubzubzubzubzubzubzub
Super Stallion
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#11 - 2012-09-23 22:31:25 UTC
would like it much better if they relaxed the rules of engagement a bit so that anyone could perform an action against a player who is commiting[sp?] a hostile act, and for 15 minutes after, without CONCORD feeling the need to get involved.
pyronatic
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#12 - 2012-09-24 00:20:06 UTC
can't tell if this is a troll or someone being serious.


if serious, eve is a game get over it.
Corina Jarr
en Welle Shipping Inc.
#13 - 2012-09-24 02:57:00 UTC  |  Edited by: Corina Jarr
So those of us who only have 1 account, and like to do a bit of everything in EVE are forced to not play when we decide to suicide for some undetermined benefit?


Last I checked, companies prefer their customers play their games.

Counter proposal:
Anyone who posts a stupid idea on the forums gets x number of days in Concord prison, x being the number of words in the post.
Nnamuachs
Kiith Paktu
Reeloaded.
#14 - 2012-09-24 10:45:37 UTC
The prison idea is a horrible one for the same reason that has repeatedly been brought up every time this idea comes up. How many people do you think are going to be OK with being prevented from playing the game for X amount of days? Absolutely no one. It would be the highest form of griefing imaginable to put someone in "prison".
Dinamita Tona
The Renegades
#15 - 2012-09-24 20:49:30 UTC
So, from all comments I can conclude following:

- everyone are great pvpers when attacking undefended ships
- everyone are great gankers when attacking in a pack solo ships in low sec

But if there would be actual consequence for such deeds - then is that a stupid idea
Redimor
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#16 - 2012-09-24 20:58:51 UTC
Dont take it so hard. Most players are those who try to get virtual growth, because they cant get it irl.
For me, this idea would be great. Those easykillers would have to do more for their kills.

But as long as mothers and fathers are paying these plexes, there wont be support for these kind of ideas.