These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

[Winter] Support Cruisers

First post First post
Author
MeBiatch
GRR GOONS
#101 - 2012-09-11 20:36:23 UTC
I'm Down wrote:
Omnathious Deninard wrote:
I'm Down wrote:
Exequror in particular looks silly OP and would beg the question, why ever use a t2 armor logistic again. Keep in mind these things get an extra rig slot to make up for resist gap.

Because this is only the First round of balances, they did state they are going to do alll T1 ships first starting with frigates, destroyers cruisers battlecrusiers battle ships (capitals i think) then T2 ships


As if Tech 2 logistics aren't silly powerful?



i hope they nerf tech II logi so it cant use large armor reps and replace the tracking link bonus for a ECCM Projector bonus...

sure this would reduce tech II logi effectiveness but ffs they are op as hell... a logi ship should slow down killing not stop it together...

then i would make a 4th bs that is a logi ship that can use large reps and a tech II version aswell...

i think if you are going to get fleet crushing RR you should be in a fleet ship!

There are no stupid Questions... just stupid people... CCP Goliath wrote:

Ugh ti-di pooping makes me sad.

Terry Gardner
Inter Stellare Kaufmannsgilde
#102 - 2012-09-11 20:37:28 UTC
Poor Exequror,

i like his cargo bonus quite a lot, use him as fast transport / light Industrial also as salvage boat and for my pi.
In future, this will be history

*tears*
I'm Down
Macabre Votum
Northern Coalition.
#103 - 2012-09-11 20:46:17 UTC  |  Edited by: I'm Down
Exequror in particular is going to be so close to t2 in strength that why would you ever ask people to fly a more expensive option again.

Loki/Legion Bonus
52 sig, 81.8% lowest resistance, ~ 40000 EHP, ~ 810 m/s speed

[Exequror, New Setup 1]
Armor Kinetic Hardener II
Armor Thermic Hardener II
Armor Explosive Hardener II
Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane II
800mm Reinforced Steel Plates II
Damage Control II

10MN Afterburner II
Medium Capacitor Battery II
Cap Recharger II
Cap Recharger II

Medium Remote Armor Repair System II
Medium Remote Armor Repair System II
Medium Remote Armor Repair System II

Medium Anti-EM Pump I
Trimark Armor Pump I
Trimark Armor Pump I

Only question mark is CPU, which I think might be overcome with a centi c-type adaptive and a 3% implant.
Ana Fox
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#104 - 2012-09-11 20:50:28 UTC
I'm Down wrote:
Exequror in particular is going to be so close to t2 in strength that why would you ever ask people to fly a more expensive option again.


Funny you will not need logistic skill for that .So you will be able to make cheep logi T1 alt and be so good "solo" pvp player.
Michael Harari
Genos Occidere
HYDRA RELOADED
#105 - 2012-09-11 21:18:15 UTC  |  Edited by: Michael Harari
Go go power creep and making solo harder

Edit: EVE needs less "press button receive damage mitigation" and more "pilot your ship very well and receive damage mitigation"
Nalha Saldana
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#106 - 2012-09-11 21:23:54 UTC
Why are some of them faster then their T2 variation?
Michael Harari
Genos Occidere
HYDRA RELOADED
#107 - 2012-09-11 21:25:15 UTC
Nalha Saldana wrote:
Why are some of them faster then their T2 variation?


Power creep, and to make soloing harder.
Michael Harari
Genos Occidere
HYDRA RELOADED
#108 - 2012-09-11 21:33:27 UTC
Goddamn, these changes just keep getting worse and worse.

Whats next, giving blackbirds an extra mid and shield resist bonus? web strength on rapiers?
Omnathious Deninard
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#109 - 2012-09-11 21:42:17 UTC
I'm Down wrote:
Exequror in particular is going to be so close to t2 in strength that why would you ever ask people to fly a more expensive option again.


Exequror reps 252 HP/s from RR and 70 HP/s from drones
Oneiros reps 384 HP/s from RR and 70 HP/s from drones

That's 132 HP/s difference.

So I still say the oneiros is better

If you don't follow the rules, neither will I.

I'm Down
Macabre Votum
Northern Coalition.
#110 - 2012-09-11 22:28:28 UTC  |  Edited by: I'm Down
Omnathious Deninard wrote:
I'm Down wrote:
Exequror in particular is going to be so close to t2 in strength that why would you ever ask people to fly a more expensive option again.


Exequror reps 252 HP/s from RR and 70 HP/s from drones
Oneiros reps 384 HP/s from RR and 70 HP/s from drones

That's 132 HP/s difference.

So I still say the oneiros is better


with Legion, it's 315 per second with an Exequor with t2 Medium Mods.

with Legion, its 394 per sec with 3 large T2 (much more unlikely than solace) for an Oneiros.

With Solace, it drops down to 355. Not nearly as large of a gap for the massive cost difference. Not to mention the encouragement to horde t1 variants in large numbers over t2 due to cost causing drastic increase in reshipping and a major logistics wall.

T1 version also does not require Logistics training, and relies instead only on lvl 5 cruiser for the cap bonus, which lets face it, most people are much more willing to train.

Massive downgrade to barriers for entry and resupply, and T1 variants can easily be built in mass on location rather than shipped from empire.

Also causes a massive reduction in cost to T1 fleets of any sort because of the reliance on T1 cost ships rather than T2 cost ships. So every T1 BC fleet just got a massive cost advantage over any T2 fleet as logistics always were the one negative cost.

Whole idea completely destroys the Ideas of Scarcity and specialized training. It promotes more shitting on players for flying anything expensive, and destroys economic principals in an economy that already suffers greatly from poor economic pressures.

Again, it pushes the game away from scarcity of wealth and the pressure of surviving and makes it easy mode for any player to just not give a ****. Reduces 0.0 to nothing but pure morale and size warfare and removes further the financial attacks on alliances.

The disparity between t1 and T2 needs to be much greater as the original logistics cruiser has always been balanced around it's specific role.

Like I said, an exequror with that setup is way to ******* powerful.
Gevlin
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#111 - 2012-09-11 22:36:29 UTC
I really like the idea of the bonuses for opposite drones. As those are often used to top up off tank inbetween battles.
L

For tacklers I usually leave drones on them as repairing them is I possible... Though logistic frigate may specials here

Someday I will have the time to play. For now it is mining afk in High sec. In Cheap ships

Omnathious Deninard
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#112 - 2012-09-11 22:45:33 UTC
I'm Down wrote:
Omnathious Deninard wrote:
[quote=I'm Down]Exequror in particular is going to be so close to t2 in strength that why would you ever ask people to fly a more expensive option again.


Exequror reps 252 HP/s from RR and 70 HP/s from drones
Oneiros reps 384 HP/s from RR and 70 HP/s from drones

That's 132 HP/s difference.

So I still say the oneiros is better


with Legion, it's 315 per second with an Exequor with t2 Medium Mods.

with Legion, its 394 per sec with 3 large T2 (much more unlikely than solace) for an Oneiros.
/quote]
I did read all of it but this is what stuck out the most
You are basing your stats with all 3 medium reps and a off grid t3 booster for the exequror and com pairing it to 3 large reps despite the oneiros being able to use 4 remote reps which spreads the gap quite a bit, especially with a off grid booster. Or we you thinking about a energy transfer for the oneiros? If so then why would the exequror not use an energy transfer as well? That would make them comparable ships again. Point being their is still a big difference between the ships.

If you don't follow the rules, neither will I.

I'm Down
Macabre Votum
Northern Coalition.
#113 - 2012-09-11 22:54:46 UTC
Omnathious Deninard wrote:
I'm Down wrote:
Omnathious Deninard wrote:
[quote=I'm Down]Exequror in particular is going to be so close to t2 in strength that why would you ever ask people to fly a more expensive option again.


Exequror reps 252 HP/s from RR and 70 HP/s from drones
Oneiros reps 384 HP/s from RR and 70 HP/s from drones

That's 132 HP/s difference.

So I still say the oneiros is better


with Legion, it's 315 per second with an Exequor with t2 Medium Mods.

with Legion, its 394 per sec with 3 large T2 (much more unlikely than solace) for an Oneiros.
/quote]
I did read all of it but this is what stuck out the most
You are basing your stats with all 3 medium reps and a off grid t3 booster for the exequror and com pairing it to 3 large reps despite the oneiros being able to use 4 remote reps which spreads the gap quite a bit, especially with a off grid booster. Or we you thinking about a energy transfer for the oneiros? If so then why would the exequror not use an energy transfer as well? That would make them comparable ships again. Point being their is still a big difference between the ships.


Almost nobody in 0.0 doe a 4 large rep Oneiros due to fittings.
Omnathious Deninard
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#114 - 2012-09-11 22:57:57 UTC
I'm Down wrote:
Omnathious Deninard wrote:
I'm Down wrote:
Omnathious Deninard wrote:
[quote=I'm Down]Exequror in particular is going to be so close to t2 in strength that why would you ever ask people to fly a more expensive option again.


Exequror reps 252 HP/s from RR and 70 HP/s from drones
Oneiros reps 384 HP/s from RR and 70 HP/s from drones

That's 132 HP/s difference.

So I still say the oneiros is better


with Legion, it's 315 per second with an Exequor with t2 Medium Mods.

with Legion, its 394 per sec with 3 large T2 (much more unlikely than solace) for an Oneiros.
/quote]
I did read all of it but this is what stuck out the most
You are basing your stats with all 3 medium reps and a off grid t3 booster for the exequror and com pairing it to 3 large reps despite the oneiros being able to use 4 remote reps which spreads the gap quite a bit, especially with a off grid booster. Or we you thinking about a energy transfer for the oneiros? If so then why would the exequror not use an energy transfer as well? That would make them comparable ships again. Point being their is still a big difference between the ships.


Almost nobody in 0.0 doe a 4 large rep Oneiros due to fittings.

So then why do you thing the exequror will be any different?
Also there are more areas in the game than 0.0 not everything has to be based around it, but everywhere as a whole

If you don't follow the rules, neither will I.

MeBiatch
GRR GOONS
#115 - 2012-09-11 23:00:50 UTC
I'm Down wrote:


Almost nobody in 0.0 doe a 4 large rep Oneiros due to fittings.


true... but CCP has a plan... much like the cylons...

tech II logi ships will have their day... but that day is not today...

let the age of Tech I logi begin!

There are no stupid Questions... just stupid people... CCP Goliath wrote:

Ugh ti-di pooping makes me sad.

I'm Down
Macabre Votum
Northern Coalition.
#116 - 2012-09-11 23:05:35 UTC  |  Edited by: I'm Down
Omnathious Deninard wrote:

So then why do you thing the exequror will be any different?
Also there are more areas in the game than 0.0 not everything has to be based around it, but everywhere as a whole


I'm going to chalk this comment up to inexperience. There are 3 standard fits for an oneiros:

3 rep MWD
3 rep AB
4 rep empire gank

The only time a 4 rep setup is ever used is for empire short duration small fights because it's super hard to make it cap stable and fit for tank.

In most common use, the Oneiros only ever fits 3 reps because it's the best fittings option.

The 3 rep fit as I showed before is only marginally better than the 3 medium rep Exeq. But when you consider general gaming strategy, there is an obvious reason why the masses of players would chose one ship over another. In this case, I spelled it out above.

It's a horrible implementation of an idea when you devalue any reason why players would chose the "superior ship" when that ship gets marginalized so much. This is especially true for dedicated logistics pilots who can look at 2 options, a 220 mil ship+ fit or a 25 mil ship + fit that's only slightly worse and far less skill intensive.

The other 3 races are much more in balance than the Exeq because they are much tighter on fittings and limited in their ability to maximize full utility. The Exeq as proposed does not have the limitations of the other 3. It's vastly superior and OP as **** for what it is, a t1 cruiser.
Omnathious Deninard
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#117 - 2012-09-11 23:14:58 UTC  |  Edited by: Omnathious Deninard
Well then by all means please show this 0.0 oneiros fit.

If you don't follow the rules, neither will I.

TrouserDeagle
Beyond Divinity Inc
Shadow Cartel
#118 - 2012-09-11 23:24:02 UTC
I hate everything.
TrouserDeagle
Beyond Divinity Inc
Shadow Cartel
#119 - 2012-09-11 23:43:44 UTC
Was the infinite cap thing on basilisks and guardians actually intentional? I had always assumed it was accidental, because of how bad it is.
Alekseyev Karrde
Noir.
Shadow Cartel
#120 - 2012-09-12 00:11:32 UTC
4 rep AB Onieros are not as uncommon as above poster would lead you to believe. Still cap stable ;)

Alek the Kidnapper, Hero of the CSM