EVE General Discussion

You misunderstand what I mean by 'reward'. High sec as a whole is a rewarding experience. Not just money to be made from mining or missions, but everything to the cost of installing jobs, the cost of refining, tax rates and so on and so forth. 100M per hour is relatively high value when the expenditure of operating in high sec is relatively low. Stations, for example, offer much more incentive and rewarding gains for use than those in null or low sec. I believe this question was recently posed, in fact, and that CCP returned that they had discussed the possibility that high sec was just 'too good' to be in overall than the other sectors.

So, as I said, there is relatively high reward in High Sec for next to no risk at all, which is not the way Eve Online should operate.

there is risk in high sec. war dec's and the moron trying to loot and steal what they can and geting to you fire on then. Then there are the gankers. I have seen freighters, high end Pve bs's ganked and of course mining ships ganked so there are risks in high sec most are player based btw. Other then say Sansha's witch is the only thing in high sec you can bank over 100 mil a hour. most mission runner make 30-60mil a hour and mining even less. so were the higher isk income? oh ya low sec and 0.0 missions like the level 5's and high end plexs.

ok what do you call imbalance? all low sec claim there a imbalance vs high sec with it come to risk. Low sec is for those that wish for higher risk and higher pay for said risk and for people looking for pvp at all times.

If Ccp mess's with high sec given its has the highest player count they will kill eve point blank. Low secer's cry and wine that they need more players well you live in low sec for your own reason why force others to play your game its a sandbox your in your part others in there.

You want to mess with the other side of the sandbox deal with rule's on that side dont go crying high sec is unfair to low sec or 0.0. Hell in 0.0 you get payed way more for less risk i know been there done that.

you what low sec with more people give us the reason to go there other then hay look its a low sec blob it not a commom site to see one ship attackng one ship low is well known for it own blobs like 0.0 and gate camping.

Low sec is the redhead stepchild no on wants why is that? Oh what the blobs,station camping and gate camping thats why. Make blobing, station and gate camping harder and you get more targets "cough" people in low sec. Low secer's caused there own problem they push people out of low sec so why is it upto ccp to fix what the player base broke from there so called farming kills at gate's and station's? you want people down there then probe out mission and plex runners after you let them in dont kill them the 2nd they jump in like most of you sry sh*t's do.

Uh, no.

You were comparing it to highsec, not lowsec.

Thats still irrelevant to your comparison to high sec.

Going by my hourly income and that of other missions runners I know, 30mill seems to be an average figure, (yes, I know some folk say they earn - insert desired fantasy figure here - per hour) what is the average hourly income for null players, assumimg one is playing in corp/alliance space?

I expect null players to now cry poverty

30-40 mill per hour is about average, yes. Ratting in my Tengu gives me ticks of around 12-15 million.

So you're coming around to about 30 million per hour, which is very close to my stated nullsec levels of income. For incursion runners this surpasses that, again for relatively minimal amounts of risk.

This was done once when they had to role back the servers due to a tech issue , It was awesome.

Please do this again, designate a weekend tell everyone one its pew pew weekend then roll back the servers on the Monday after the fun.

Tal

you're doing something awfully wrong if you're getting 12-15m ticks fyi