These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

A possible solution to AFK cloaky alts

First post
Author
Theodoric Darkwind
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#361 - 2011-10-13 06:33:34 UTC
The Apostle wrote:
Theodoric Darkwind wrote:
Name Family Name wrote:
How about you stop being ******* renters and join a real alliance that can actually defend the space you claim?

Problem solved.


QFT

Carebears are NOT entitled to nullsec space free of intruders, if you want risk free PvE go back to highsec.

absolutely nothing wrong with parking a cloaky in someones system, especially when it extracts delicious carebear tears.

I've heard heaps of Testies bitching real bad at AFK cloakies in 7BX and/or PXF when you're trying to rat.

From memory, one cloaky was in 7BX for more than a month..... Is he still there?

Did you "get him"?


Any TESTie who whines about AFK cloakers is just asking to be trolled to no end by the rest of the alliance. I personally have never had a problem with AFK cloakers, if someone is parked in a ratting system I just find a different system to rat in until they leave.

Also anyone who rats in 6VDT or 7BX is just asking to get ganked.

Thanks to having a large npc pocket fountain is well infested with pirates looking for ratters to gank, yet you never see TEST whining about afk cloakers (even though on any given day several of our ratting systems will have afk cloakers in them).

Virtually all of the afk cloaker whine seems to come from lolrenters.
The Apostle
Doomheim
#362 - 2011-10-13 06:35:47 UTC  |  Edited by: CCP Phantom
A low SP cloaky alt can shut down a whole system and he doesn't even need to be awake. If there was an appropriate counter (which is what we're asking for) then it's not an issue.

Edit: Off topic parts removed. CCP Phantom.

[i]Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo![/i]

The Apostle
Doomheim
#363 - 2011-10-13 06:40:58 UTC
Theodoric Darkwind wrote:
The Apostle wrote:
Theodoric Darkwind wrote:
Name Family Name wrote:
How about you stop being ******* renters and join a real alliance that can actually defend the space you claim?

Problem solved.


QFT

Carebears are NOT entitled to nullsec space free of intruders, if you want risk free PvE go back to highsec.

absolutely nothing wrong with parking a cloaky in someones system, especially when it extracts delicious carebear tears.

I've heard heaps of Testies bitching real bad at AFK cloakies in 7BX and/or PXF when you're trying to rat.

From memory, one cloaky was in 7BX for more than a month..... Is he still there?

Did you "get him"?


Any TESTie who whines about AFK cloakers is just asking to be trolled to no end by the rest of the alliance. I personally have never had a problem with AFK cloakers, if someone is parked in a ratting system I just find a different system to rat in until they leave.

Also anyone who rats in 6VDT or 7BX is just asking to get ganked.

Thanks to having a large npc pocket fountain is well infested with pirates looking for ratters to gank, yet you never see TEST whining about afk cloakers (even though on any given day several of our ratting systems will have afk cloakers in them).

Virtually all of the afk cloaker whine seems to come from lolrenters.

Dude, you're either new there or you don't rat. Testies were the biggest whiners about AFK cloakies I ever heard or saw. So often I heard

"ffs, can someone come kill this fn cloaky, he's been here 2 weeks!!"
" let's form a fleet and get this cloaky, he's pissing me off"

yadda ya....

As always reply was. You can't. Which is the point of this topic.

[i]Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo![/i]

KrakizBad
Section 8.
#364 - 2011-10-13 06:52:44 UTC
19 pages and cloakies still working exactly as intended. Yawn.
Theodoric Darkwind
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#365 - 2011-10-13 06:58:05 UTC
The Apostle wrote:
Theodoric Darkwind wrote:
The Apostle wrote:
Theodoric Darkwind wrote:
Name Family Name wrote:
How about you stop being ******* renters and join a real alliance that can actually defend the space you claim?

Problem solved.


QFT

Carebears are NOT entitled to nullsec space free of intruders, if you want risk free PvE go back to highsec.

absolutely nothing wrong with parking a cloaky in someones system, especially when it extracts delicious carebear tears.

I've heard heaps of Testies bitching real bad at AFK cloakies in 7BX and/or PXF when you're trying to rat.

From memory, one cloaky was in 7BX for more than a month..... Is he still there?

Did you "get him"?


Any TESTie who whines about AFK cloakers is just asking to be trolled to no end by the rest of the alliance. I personally have never had a problem with AFK cloakers, if someone is parked in a ratting system I just find a different system to rat in until they leave.

Also anyone who rats in 6VDT or 7BX is just asking to get ganked.

Thanks to having a large npc pocket fountain is well infested with pirates looking for ratters to gank, yet you never see TEST whining about afk cloakers (even though on any given day several of our ratting systems will have afk cloakers in them).

Virtually all of the afk cloaker whine seems to come from lolrenters.

Dude, you're either new there or you don't rat. Testies were the biggest whiners about AFK cloakies I ever heard or saw. So often I heard

"ffs, can someone come kill this fn cloaky, he's been here 2 weeks!!"
" let's form a fleet and get this cloaky, he's pissing me off"

yadda ya....

As always reply was. You can't. Which is the point of this topic.


Ive been in TEST for 4 months, what few afk cloaker whiners I have seen get trolled horribly and other than 7BX (which is a stupid system to rat in anyway since the hostiles in 6VDT 23/7 are usually NOT afk) ive never seen an afk cloaker sit in a system more than 1-2 days. We even have some stupid afk cloakers that sit in non-ratting systems lol.
The Apostle
Doomheim
#366 - 2011-10-13 07:03:07 UTC  |  Edited by: The Apostle
KrakizBad wrote:
19 pages and cloakies still working exactly as intended. Yawn.

Yes they do. I used to blop with a rapier on the bridge as point man. The waiting and anticipation to get a blob in and smack some poor ratter was joyous. Succesful blops feeels sooo elite.....

And get this, if the AFK cloakies were made to fight or spooked into action, all the boys in system would know when a cloaky came in that a fight was on, instead of having their time wasted with faggotry.

It'd make blops even more joyous...

You know, turn it from "yawn, again?!" to "LET"S DO THIS!"......

[i]Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo![/i]

KrakizBad
Section 8.
#367 - 2011-10-13 07:10:16 UTC
The Apostle wrote:
KrakizBad wrote:
19 pages and cloakies still working exactly as intended. Yawn.

Yes they do. I used to blop with a rapier on the bridge as point man. The waiting and anticipation to get a blob in and smack some poor ratter was joyous. Succesful blops feeels sooo elite.....

And get this, if the AFK cloakies were made to fight or spooked into action, all the boys in system would know when a cloaky came in that a fight was on, instead of having their time wasted with faggotry.

It'd make blops even more joyous...

You know, turn it from "yawn, again?!" to "LET"S DO THIS!"......


Even better, leave cloaking exactly as it is, and plant AFK cloakies in every single system with a sanctum. All in cyno ships.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#368 - 2011-10-13 07:20:12 UTC
So… even after all those pages, I can't help noticing that still is no explanation why AFK cloakers are supposedly a problem that needs to be solved.
KrakizBad
Section 8.
#369 - 2011-10-13 07:24:56 UTC
Tippia wrote:
So… even after all those pages, I can't help noticing that still is no explanation why AFK cloakers are supposedly a problem that needs to be solved.


Dey took our jorbs!
Signal11th
#370 - 2011-10-13 07:38:29 UTC
Personally although I don't even see a problem with it I would choose Ingvars solution over any of the others.

I went to bed last night and come back to work in the morning and I can't believe that the people moaning about AFK cloaking (4 from what I can see) are still banging on about it compared to the other 100+ post telling them to stop wasting our time.

Just because you moan louder and then when that doesn't work moan even LOUDER doesn't mean anything will get done because the majority of people on the forums are happy with the way it works.

Apply for the CSM on the basis of nerfing cloaking and I'll run for CSM for it to be left alone and I bet you I get more support!
Now getting rid of local is a different argument! Blink

God Said "Come Forth and receive eternal life!" I came fifth and won a toaster!

Zendon Taredi
Tier Four Technologies
#371 - 2011-10-13 08:32:00 UTC
Jesus, these people would never make it in a wormhole.
Endeavour Starfleet
#372 - 2011-10-13 08:35:38 UTC
Stating that I will use the forum report function to report posts that violate the TOS is not holding up a gun to someones head. Saying so is libel. Period.

A warp off to stop the probe process is quick and easy you just have to go off grid and come back. Which ought to take mere seconds. If you miss a kill it is because you have messed up your warp system.

You have to admit it sounds a hell of alot better than random decloaks, Cloak fuel, bay or other methods that will literally leave you unable to cloak or decloak in front of say POS guns. This targets just those who arent around to see the warning pop up.
Baneken
Arctic Light Inc.
Arctic Light
#373 - 2011-10-13 08:41:39 UTC
Problem isn't cloaking it's hulk costing you 200mils a pop with less defence then your average T1 frigate.
If that thing could survive even a BS rat there would be a lot less whining on the issue and removing local solves nothing.
It works in WH because you cannot hot drop and you have to actually find your targets first unlike in 0.0 where you immediately can find a good system by just looking at the sov index and call in a drop.
Endeavour Starfleet
#374 - 2011-10-13 11:05:10 UTC
If my plan interferes with you then so be it. Because just about any other plan would SERIOUSLY impact active cloaking.

How would you like to be watching a POS and then decloak because you forgot to refuel the cloak fuel? POS guns say hai and you lose your shiny ship. How would you like to suddenly decloak from a "Solar effect" or other system? I will support them over nothing being done but I feel my plan has the best chance to have the least impact on active cloaking.
Signal11th
#375 - 2011-10-13 11:09:11 UTC
Endeavour Starfleet wrote:
If my plan interferes with you then so be it. Because just about any other plan would SERIOUSLY impact active cloaking.

How would you like to be watching a POS and then decloak because you forgot to refuel the cloak fuel? POS guns say hai and you lose your shiny ship. How would you like to suddenly decloak from a "Solar effect" or other system? I will support them over nothing being done but I feel my plan has the best chance to have the least impact on active cloaking.




Please for the love of GOD no more I can't take it anymore, put a proposal in CSM forums and I'll even sign it for you if it will stop your posting on this subject!

God Said "Come Forth and receive eternal life!" I came fifth and won a toaster!

Woo Glin
State War Academy
Caldari State
#376 - 2011-10-13 11:45:37 UTC
Just gonna cloak up here and wait for the snipe.
Ingvar Angst
Nasty Pope Holding Corp
#377 - 2011-10-13 11:49:02 UTC
Renan Ruivo wrote:
Thing is i want a method to catch cloakers. Not because they prevent me from ratting because i can rat just fine with them on system.. but because i don't like the idea of anything being 100% safe while flying in space. Overheat, cloak fuel, probe that drops me within 10km from him i don't care.

Local or no local I want to have tools to find him.


Or are you scared of being popped? You want to be perfectly safe, pretty thing?


There's more to life than null. You nerf cloaking you severely nerf wormholes. Being able to be undetectable while cloaked is critical to wormhole operations. Anything that violates the integrity of the cloaking device has severe repercussions to areas outside your little fluffy null space garden.

Six months in the hole... it changes a man.

Woo Glin
State War Academy
Caldari State
#378 - 2011-10-13 11:53:22 UTC
I hope you realize that you can make more money botting in empire and not even have to deal with this stuff.

Just think of all the money you'll save on rent.
Ingvar Angst
Nasty Pope Holding Corp
#379 - 2011-10-13 12:12:04 UTC
Endeavour Starfleet wrote:
If my plan interferes with you then so be it. Because just about any other plan would SERIOUSLY impact active cloaking.

How would you like to be watching a POS and then decloak because you forgot to refuel the cloak fuel? POS guns say hai and you lose your shiny ship. How would you like to suddenly decloak from a "Solar effect" or other system? I will support them over nothing being done but I feel my plan has the best chance to have the least impact on active cloaking.


Your plan has a tremendously negative impact on all cloaking, be it active or inactive. ANYTHING that prevents the ability to cloak as long as wanted or needed is a nerf to the entire wormhole culture. You completely disrupt the ability to covertly gather intel on an enemy system in order to plan for an operation. Secrecy is required, and the most successful (and profitable) ops come when intel gathering pilot is simply never seen... the first clue the enemy has that something is happening is when they log on and see the "Oh ****!" emails the pos sent to them. Like I mentioned before, you may need to be cloaked and unmoving for hours a day for days on end to gather accurate intel, and I've seen someone amazingly dedicated enough to do exactly that.

So, by popular request, I'll repost my solution to the non-issue... a solution that actually improves (in my opinion) upon the current system and makes life a little more interesting.

1. When a ship cloaks it is removed from local. No one in the system can see that the pilot is in system.

2. When a ship cloaks it also loses the ability to use local. You can't see who's in local, you can't use local for intel gathering. Covops vessels, for example, would have to actively engage in the intel gathering process, much like in wormholes. You have options already to do this... using DScan, using probes, flying to various locations and simply watching.

So that this point here, we have a cloaked ship in a system that's truly cloaked. He's hidden from the system and the system, outside of his own actions, is hidden from him. He's actively gathering intel, or he's cloaked afk somewhere affecting noone, it doesn't matter. The local denizens have no idea if he's even there. However, to balance the "hot drop" issue, we include:

3. When a ship decloaks, there's a delay in being able to activate a cyno. Call it 15, 30 seconds, whatever. Give ships a fighting chance to escape from the invisible cloaker they never knew was there. Possible exception... Black Ops ships could be allowed no delay in lighting the cyno. Gives them a bigger role in the game, no?

But there you go, a solid framework that would not only end the whole "afk cloaker" faux-controversy but turn intel gathering into a more active endeavour and act a bit of tactical usage to cloaks.

Six months in the hole... it changes a man.

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#380 - 2011-10-13 12:14:57 UTC
Endeavour Starfleet wrote:
If my plan interferes with you then so be it. Because just about any other plan would SERIOUSLY impact active cloaking.
Funnily enough, no. The Angsty one's plan would have a very tiny impact on cloaking.
Quote:
I will support them over nothing being done
…and yet, the fundamental question remains: why does anything need to be done?