These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

CCP > Not starting an argument about the carrier changes but...
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Signal11th
#81 - 2011-10-12 10:09:24 UTC
From CCP Tallest -

"In this thread, I've read several very good reasons why the fighter change is a bad idea. You are right. Fighters should stay the way they are. The change would be unfair for carriers."


Was posted somewhere else so I don't know how recent or valid this is?


God Said "Come Forth and receive eternal life!" I came fifth and won a toaster!
Sable Moran
Moran Light Industries
#82 - 2011-10-12 10:13:11 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
Also, the sig radius of fighters isn't being changed AFAIK.


Their sig RADIUS never was, only their sig RESOLUTION. And even that change is being retracted if dev posts are to be believed.

Sable's Ammo Shop at Alentene V - Moon 4 - Duvolle Labs Factory. Hybrid charges, Projectile ammo, Missiles, Drones, Ships, Need'em? We have'em, at affordable prices. Pop in at our Ammo Shop in sunny Alentene.
Mr LaboratoryRat
Confederation of DuckTape Lovers
#83 - 2011-10-12 10:24:55 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
Of course it diminishes the ability! You've got fighters with sig radiuses the size of battleships, and absolutely no defence against smaller ships. They are in no way going to be worth the year of skill investment or the cash to buy them.


How many roebels is that?

Lucas Kell wrote:

I'd be surpirsed if anybody but the biggest alliances with caps on their ship replace will take them out now.


Guess its time for u guys to burn, all your anger should be directed towards your friends that exploited the overpowerd spazeshipz; because of them they get nerfed

Lucas Kell wrote:

Skills in this take time, and time costs money.


How many hours of botting is that?

Lucas Kell wrote:

I'm now not going to be gettign the product I paid for.


So u play this game to fly a carrier?

Lucas Kell wrote:

If you bought a sat nav for your car, and they changed it so it didnt give directions anymore you'd want a refund. All I want is a refund. To be honest, if they want to give me 12 plex instead of the skillpoints I'm happy with that too.


Let me fix your sentence:

If you bought a carrier for anomaly farming, and they changed it so it didnt give good isk anymore you'd want a refund. All I want is a refund. To be honest, if they want to give me 12 plex instead of the $$ I'm happy with that too
non judgement
Without Fear
Flying Burning Ships Alliance
#84 - 2011-10-12 11:51:33 UTC
Dirk Magnum wrote:
People have been complaining about Supercarriers since their current form existed only on Sisi. There was a big problem that many people spotted and pointed out repeatedly, but CCP went ahead anyway, and the OP supercarrer was unleashed upon Tranquility. If all of your enjoyment in the game comes from flying something that's clearly unbalanced then that's just too bad, I suppose.

I thought when they put the new super carriers on sisi. They thought they were too strong and nerfed the changes on sisi. Then heaps of people complained "we liked the way supercarriers were when they first came to sisi pls change them back to that". So CCP returned them back to the original supercarriers they had on sisi to begin with. Then months later after CCP had put them in the game. Everyone was flying supercarriers cause they killed everything.

It's a bit odd how people complain about things before they even see how the new changes work out.