These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Goons 4x4ing through the Sandbox - Market Manipulation on a Grand Scale

First post First post First post
Author
Better Than You
Doomheim
#821 - 2012-06-22 08:43:50 UTC
Thanks for ruining the FW and the LP market you attention starved jerks! About time you shove off and ruin a different game don't you think?! I look forward to your bans for exploiting game mechanics and will be here drinking in the oceans of tears from your fellow alliance mates crying about how their buddy was given the kick to the curb.

-2 accounts till goons are removed from the game. They say they bring content, but it is in fact a complete load of bullshit.
Vincent VanDamme
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#822 - 2012-06-22 08:44:34 UTC
Lord Zim wrote:
Wille Sanara wrote:
So...exploiting a game mechanic that is obviously not working as intended is a bug, right? So we are going to see banhammer strike, right, CCP?Shocked

By that logic neut logis should be banhammered, people evading wardecs through neutral alts should be banhammered, people blapping BSes with tracking-fit titans should be banhammered etc.


Not sure if serious.

The logic isnt the same. If X then Y does not follow If A,,B,C then Y.




InternetSpaceship
State War Academy
Caldari State
#823 - 2012-06-22 08:48:20 UTC  |  Edited by: InternetSpaceship
Better Than You wrote:
Thanks for ruining the FW and the LP market you attention starved jerks! About time you shove off and ruin a different game don't you think?! I look forward to your bans for exploiting game mechanics and will be here drinking in the oceans of tears from your fellow alliance mates crying about how their buddy was given the kick to the curb.

-2 accounts till goons are removed from the game. They say they bring content, but it is in fact a complete load of bullshit.


Ok, come wipe us out. Should be easy, most people in game hate us, so make a huge alliance and come curb stomp us. Eve allows you to do this. There's your player created content.

Oh yeah, you're a pubbie. You'll just cry to CCP to remove game challenges for you.

Official Recruiter for GoonSwarm Corporation.

If you paid isk to get into GoonSwarm, you were probably scammed.  If you had the foresight to save the name of your scammer, let me know and I'll do what I can to help you.

Kinis Deren
Mosquito Squadron
D0GS OF WAR
#824 - 2012-06-22 08:48:32 UTC
I wonder why CCP aren't heralding yet another "awesome player driven event by Goonswarm!" this time? Will heads roll at CCP over this? That would be a sad turn of events, IMHO.

Did Mittens and co just throw CCP "under the bus" for a bit of post Fanfest/CSM election fiasco payback or is this a deflection strategy over the Inferno 1.1 war dec change drama. /me adjusts tinfoil hat P

How many alts could you create with the profit to influence the outcome of, say, CSM8? Twisted
ModeratedToSilence
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#825 - 2012-06-22 08:49:20 UTC  |  Edited by: ModeratedToSilence
Vincent VanDamme wrote:
InternetSpaceship wrote:
Vincent VanDamme wrote:
So, a bug was abused?

This is a no brainer, isn't it?




Is orbiting a ship at 500m with mwd to make it harder to shoot you an exploit?

Because it's the same thing here. They used a game mechanic provided to them, studied it, understood it, and used it to help themselves succeed in the game. Everything worked exactly as it should have.


Is debuffing your ships so they have unlimited range an exploit?


1: Was this the intended use of this mechanic?
No

2: Were the people involved aware this was not the intended use of this mechanic?
Yes

3: Did the people involved profit from the unintended use of this mechanic?
Yes



Did they notify CCP?
Yes

Did they receive a reply that informed them such actions were illegal in the game?
No
InternetSpaceship
State War Academy
Caldari State
#826 - 2012-06-22 08:51:07 UTC
ModeratedToSilence wrote:

Did they notify CCP?
Yes

Did they receive a reply that informed them such actions were illegal in the game?
No


This post, while accurate, will be completely ignored.

Official Recruiter for GoonSwarm Corporation.

If you paid isk to get into GoonSwarm, you were probably scammed.  If you had the foresight to save the name of your scammer, let me know and I'll do what I can to help you.

Sizeof Void
Ninja Suicide Squadron
#827 - 2012-06-22 08:54:43 UTC
Wasse wrote:

As someone who works for a software company (business software, but still software), I've never once heard bad design called a bug.

A design feature which is coded correctly, but does not work as intended in the field, is indeed known as a design "bug".

These sorts of bugs happen frequently in large, complex software systems, where it is difficult or impossible to work out all of the possible use cases, via QA or simulation, prior to release.

Perhaps you remember the Patriot Missile software failure during the Gulf War, which resulted in a failed Scud intercept and the deaths of 28 US soldiers? This failure was due to a design bug, not a coding bug.
InternetSpaceship
State War Academy
Caldari State
#828 - 2012-06-22 08:55:16 UTC
Kinis Deren wrote:
I wonder why CCP aren't heralding yet another "awesome player driven event by Goonswarm!" this time? Will heads roll at CCP over this? That would be a sad turn of events, IMHO.


Heads will not roll, because this is a game, and further, a computer program. Computer programs have bugs, it happens. CCP (hopefully) won't destroy a person's livelihood because he failed to write perfect code.

This is not a big deal in real life, at least for them. The same can't be said for quite a few members of this board.

Official Recruiter for GoonSwarm Corporation.

If you paid isk to get into GoonSwarm, you were probably scammed.  If you had the foresight to save the name of your scammer, let me know and I'll do what I can to help you.

atrum dux
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#829 - 2012-06-22 08:56:42 UTC  |  Edited by: atrum dux
Vincent VanDamme wrote:
atrum dux wrote:
Wait so I'm getting banned for manipulating the jita market?


Nope.

Bug abuse i think is whats being referenced.


It's a bug because ccp didn't intend for people to get lp by blowing up ships and market manipulation isn't allowed if you're not a jita market bot.
Rer Eirikr
The Scope
#830 - 2012-06-22 09:01:57 UTC
God ******* damn this is brilliant, just brilliant. Well played Illuminati Goons.
Tallian Saotome
Nuclear Arms Exchange Inc.
#831 - 2012-06-22 09:07:03 UTC
Terrorfrodo wrote:

Wait, when did they unban mention of kugu? That WAY more significant than any goonscam.

Inappropriate signature removed, CCP Phantom.

Sizeof Void
Ninja Suicide Squadron
#832 - 2012-06-22 09:08:13 UTC
ModeratedToSilence wrote:

Did they notify CCP?
Yes

Did they receive a reply that informed them such actions were illegal in the game?
No

I believe that this particular argument was used by Hydra/OB, in the ATX incident. I also seem to recall that it was rejected.

So, I rather doubt that anyone involved in this incident is planning to throw down a repeat of that failed logic.
Rodj Blake
PIE Inc.
Khimi Harar
#833 - 2012-06-22 09:09:42 UTC  |  Edited by: Rodj Blake
So in summary:

CCP failed to implement the simple FW fix (ie NPC rebalance) that a large number of FWers have been asking for for years.

CCP failed to sit down with long-time FWers from all sides to discuss how to proceed as had been requested on multiple occasions.

Instead CCP decided to do things their own way and made a massive ****-up.

Good work CCP.

Dolce et decorum est pro Imperium mori

Wisdom Divine
State Protectorate
Caldari State
#834 - 2012-06-22 09:11:34 UTC
I see no bugs or exploits here. Just a malleable game mechanic some people cleverly optimized on and gained from.
Hermia
HIVE
Memento Moriendo
#835 - 2012-06-22 09:17:03 UTC
Graic Gabtar wrote:
Best dev blog ever.


Im not a devout devswarm believer but it still funny Lol

Singulis Pacifica
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#836 - 2012-06-22 09:17:22 UTC
Vincent VanDamme wrote:
So, a bug was abused?

This is a no brainer, isn't it?




Actually, it's not that simple. If this case would ever be brought to a real-life court, the Goons would likely go free. The problem is that there is no decisive evidence to support that the Goons did do this on purpose.

"Whaaa? They admitted doing this! There's your evidence, dude"

Precisely. It's the Goons admitting the scheme, which holds no value whatsover. They are of the same value as the ramblings of a madman. It can not be proven whether the Goons were deliberately abusing a system or they merely discovered this by accident and thought it was just working as CCP intended. In real-life court, the Goons would use the latter as a valid means of defense and would get away with it.

The key here is to realize this is not a real-life court. CCP has to act, but needs time to fully investigate what has happened. It is very likely that CCP was not even aware of this during their internal testing. That is because of one thing and one thing only:

The Goons know this game better than the CCP developers do.

Bottom-line is that the Goons gather around and wonder how to abuse and manipulate the system. That is the sole-purpose of their meetings. CCP does not have these. They don't have a group of hackers ready to do internal testing on how to abuse a system CCP designed. They release it to the live-servers and the Goons are the ones testing it.

Without the Goons, this would not have been discovered for a while. And clever players would have found out eventually, by accident or on purpose. Regardless, it would likely be abused over a longer period of time as the Goons are honest enough to publicize their findings in a relatively short time-frame (within a month upon release on the live servers).

Should the Goons be punished? Ban their accounts? Possibly. CCP has the right and ability to do whatever she deems fit. They can ban the Goon players admitting that they did this, or the entire corp. Perhaps even the entire alliance. Problem is that there is no right-way of dealing with it. If they ban players or a corp/alliance, they no longer hold on to the concept of the sandbox: give players the freedom to develop themselves. If they won't take action at all, other players will be disheartened knowing that "crime pays off". An example of this attitude is given by this post:

Wille Sanara wrote:
So...exploiting a game mechanic that is obviously not working as intended is a bug, right? So we are going to see banhammer strike, right, CCP?


I really wouldn't want to be in CCP's shoes right now. They were beaten in a game that they created, outsmarted by its players.

CCP, if you do decide on actions against the Goons, may I suggest keeping this only to a small core group of developers? The more CCP employees know about actions against the Goons, the more likely the chance they will be tipped off giving them ample time to prepare for the upcoming ban or any other action you may take. As I said before, Goons will outsmart you and they will find a way to get around your ban or roll-back, or whatever you come up with. The only true way to punish them is a shift, sudden action with no time to prepare.

It will be interesting to see what the outcome is of this.

Oh and as personal opinion, I highly favor a ban of all Goons for a month. Determine whose accounts are from Goons players and ban all of them without any warning given. Give out the message that this was one abuse too many.

but... I'm realist enough to know CCP will likely not do such action and I won't be disheartened if CCP doesn't do anything at all. CCP knows the Goonswarm will always be one step ahead of them like true hackers trying to enter a protected system.
Graic Gabtar
The Lemon Party
#837 - 2012-06-22 09:17:58 UTC
CCP Sreegs wrote:
By way of explanation we addressed the manipulation issue but haven't yet completed the investigation into the scope of the abuse. Once that happens I'm pretty sure some people are going to be a bit less smug about the money they made that one time when there was a bank error in their favor and then lost again when the bank fixed the glitch.
Interesting.

Haven't yet "completed the investigation" but a pre-determined outcome seems to have been decided.

To me this seems horribly like CCP sour grapes as they were simply outclassed. Yeah, markets were trashed, but nothing was magically spawned - it was a poorly designed mechanic.

Even after the LP gimp GS simply adapted so CCP obviously knew something was up. They failed at game mechanics design and will now revert to hacks and gimps. They have just cracked the ***** because they were outplayed.

There is simply no other way to put it.

If this is so bad why aren't CCP launching investigations into people "abusing" the Margin Trading skill or people "abusing" the markets through manipulations?

Where's the CCP cavalry then?
Henk Fixer
Doomheim
#838 - 2012-06-22 09:18:50 UTC
I think in general this is great, another of those EvE stories that make people want to play the game. It would be nothing without the drama.

However, its spoilt by the usual low level intellect posts by the Goons. "buhuhuh pubbie tears, I r waiting here for my tears" (when really, 2% of people reply here who are upset, 98% of EvE couldnt give a ****)

I can appreciate the thought and execution by the top level who set it in motion, less impressed by the brain dead dribbling masses of goons who think spamming the word "ground floor!!" somehow means they were involved.

I suppose its a little like Stephen Hawkings figuring out how the Universe began, and his colostomy bag cheering for joy and claiming it had something to do with it.
Aeryn Tiberius
Revenent Defence Corperation
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#839 - 2012-06-22 09:21:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Aeryn Tiberius
I just want to thank the goons for showing how messed up CCP really is. Thank you, CCP tries to create a sandbox then players build a sandbox and put CCP into it.
Crellion
Nano Rhinos
PURPLE HELMETED WARRIORS
#840 - 2012-06-22 09:25:31 UTC
Sizeof Void wrote:
Wasse wrote:

As someone who works for a software company (business software, but still software), I've never once heard bad design called a bug.

A design feature which is coded correctly, but does not work as intended in the field, is indeed known as a design "bug".

These sorts of bugs happen frequently in large, complex software systems, where it is difficult or impossible to work out all of the possible use cases, via QA or simulation, prior to release.

Perhaps you remember the Patriot Missile software failure during the Gulf War, which resulted in a failed Scud intercept and the deaths of 28 US soldiers? This failure was due to a design bug, not a coding bug.


I disagree with the part in bold.

Creating a system where the reward to the killer is potentially 4x the loss of the person whose ship just diaf'd (or eve 1.5x for that matter) is a sure way to introduce an easy exploit in a game where everyone knows that the same RL controller can be both the killer and the victim.

A great many people saw this merely from reading the dev blog... so for the devs not to spot it .... hmmmm....