These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Assembly Hall

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

[Proposal] Postpone plans to improve FW

First post
Author
Veshta Yoshida
PIE Inc.
Khimi Harar
#1 - 2011-10-06 17:04:14 UTC
Bet you think this odd coming from me, a rabid pig-dog Imperial mercenary, but bear with me.

- CCP overslept and completely missed the Fanfest roundtable on the subject and have yet to do anything other than assign blame (which fell on the FF scheduler of all people Shocked).
- For three years they have done absolutely nothing but fix bugs introduced through changes to other parts of Eve (thank you FW mash-up code) and let it devolve into the single most lucrative mission whorehouse of all time.
- They had as of a few months ago no definitive plans (read: hadn't even given it thought) as to what FW should or even could be due to it being so far down their to-do list.
- CCP has now committed themselves to fixing all of time and space in an effort to win back the hearts and minds that they lost playing with barbie's at the exclusion of everything else.

We do not deserve and I do not want some half-assed patch job of a fix which is what we will get if it is to be crammed into a pot together with all the other glaring holes they have committed themselves to fixing.

Postpone it and release it as a staged "expansion" instead as that is the only way to ensure it becomes worthwhile changes.

Veshta Yoshida
Harbinger of truth, Purveyor of the cleansing flame.
Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#2 - 2011-10-06 17:19:36 UTC
Veshta Yoshida wrote:
Bet you think this odd coming from me, a rabid pig-dog Imperial mercenary, but bear with me.

- CCP overslept and completely missed the Fanfest roundtable on the subject and have yet to do anything other than assign blame (which fell on the FF scheduler of all people Shocked).
- For three years they have done absolutely nothing but fix bugs introduced through changes to other parts of Eve (thank you FW mash-up code) and let it devolve into the single most lucrative mission whorehouse of all time.
- They had as of a few months ago no definitive plans (read: hadn't even given it thought) as to what FW should or even could be due to it being so far down their to-do list.
- CCP has now committed themselves to fixing all of time and space in an effort to win back the hearts and minds that they lost playing with barbie's at the exclusion of everything else.

We do not deserve and I do not want some half-assed patch job of a fix which is what we will get if it is to be crammed into a pot together with all the other glaring holes they have committed themselves to fixing.

Postpone it and release it as a staged "expansion" instead as that is the only way to ensure it becomes worthwhile changes.

Veshta Yoshida
Harbinger of truth, Purveyor of the cleansing flame.



I am somewhat sympathetic to your view here. If they are not going to change a thing for another 4 years then yes don't rush it.

But I think they need to continue to iterate/and experiment on it in stages. So I say go ahead and push through some changes to fw - especially the fw plexing mechanics. Very very few use them now anyway. It can hardly hurt to try to make improvements to them. I say go ahead and experiment.

I hope they do some changes and see what works what doesn't and continue to iterate. Trying to predict everything is not going to work.

As far as a player round table and that sort of thing we need to accept that although players want fw "fixed" there is very little consensus on how exactly to do that. We have had 3 years of people complaining that plexing is a broken mechanic. I don't think another 6 months will really clarify much.



Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

King Rothgar
Deadly Solutions
#3 - 2011-10-06 21:33:03 UTC
I'm inclined to agree here, I'd rather wait for a summer expansion and have it done right than to get a half assed attempt this winter. The changes it needs are pretty big. It's on par with reworking sov mechanics in null sec. It requires serious thought, player review (we are masters of finding ways to exploit any system) and a fair bit of testing and tweaking. In effect, we need Empyrean Age II. On the bright side, I think the current FW community is all pretty much on the same page as to the changes that are needed. So it's not terribly controversial like fixing hybrids or reworking SC's.

[u]Fireworks and snowballs are great, but what I really want is a corpse launcher.[/u]

Hirana Yoshida
Behavioral Affront
#4 - 2011-10-06 21:49:50 UTC
Well we are on the same page in regards to what needs fixing, but as to how to go about it .... hahahahaha.

Reason I asked for postponement is CCP's track record .. sure they can crank out a lot of stuff in short order, but it will be marred with bugs and have the survivability of a hamburger at a Weight Watchers seminar.

Then again, none of us know what they can do with full focus on FiS since they have never done it before (post company expansion), so they might be able to pull out the proverbial rabbit .. but I would rather err on the side of caution and have it done right.
Super Chair
Project Cerberus
Templis CALSF
#5 - 2011-10-07 00:31:54 UTC
+1 to the hamburger comment, it made me lol Lol


Back to subject, Hilmars letter regarding how they set too big goals of themselves (wanting a full incarna, but instead ended up with a single CQ) and didn't realize how big of a goal they set themselves. Unless they've been doing a lot of internal development, months prior to these two most recent blogs, it shouldnt be rushed. However I don't think FW needs that much fixing, letting alliances in (joining should make them unable to hold sov), tweaking npcs and spawn mechanics are all things players have been proposing that ccp do for years. I'm sure if ccp did the legwork and went through all the old forum posts in the assembly hall (old forums included) they'd have a pretty good idea of what needs fixed and have a generally good idea of how to go about fixing it.
Dirk Smacker
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#6 - 2011-10-07 01:07:07 UTC  |  Edited by: Dirk Smacker
As long as it is implemented during the back half of the winter "expansion", they have enough time to figure out what players want and implement a revamp.

Quote:
letting alliances in (joining should make them unable to hold sov)

I can't stress enough how important both parts of that statement is.

I guess once you have a signature, you cannot have a blank one.

Flyinghotpocket
Small Focused Memes
Ragequit Cancel Sub
#7 - 2011-10-07 01:11:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Flyinghotpocket
Agreed on the postponement. for all of veshta's reasons

the Empyrean Age II is a good idea. id rather have FW fixed the right way. not the half a**ed way.

Amarr Militia Representative - A jar of nitro

Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#8 - 2011-10-07 02:21:21 UTC
Well if we are going to ask that they postpone it can we at least be clear what we are waiting for? Do we need one more fanfest roundtable on fw??

Most of the issues have existed since 2008. So we have had several fw roundtables at the various fanfests since that time. Do we need them to wait for one more fanfest roundtable? What will that accomplish?

I actually find it somewhat surreal that I have to argue that fw shouldn't be postponed any longer. 3 years of a broken mechanic should be long enough.

As was said above the winter expansion extends into the next spring. So if we put this off until summer we may not see any changes until next fall.

And why does ccp need to be cautious? I mean I don't really know anyone who only plays eve for the fw plexxing.
Maybe the concern is sasawong will rage quit if they somehow change it in a way he doesn't like? I mean who else really cares about plexing under the current mecanics? If anything CCP should feel very free to be creative on this part of eve.


Fixing plexing, fixing alliances, add some things to the lp store and that alone would make for a great expansion. There isn't much more that they *need* to mess with. Should they do more? Yes of course. But I don't see why they can't put a dozen devs on it and get allot of good things done in the next 4 months. (Of course I don't know anything about computer game programming eitther)

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

Flyinghotpocket
Small Focused Memes
Ragequit Cancel Sub
#9 - 2011-10-07 04:52:19 UTC
a resonable goal for the devs is by the end of this month. is to have gone through all the forum posts on fw fixing, compilied a list of suggest changes/ improvments to be made. next month start elminating them one by one.

Amarr Militia Representative - A jar of nitro

Hirana Yoshida
Behavioral Affront
#10 - 2011-10-07 08:32:00 UTC
Cearain wrote:
.."About roundtables"..

I would be happy knowing that they actually have a grasp on the problems (read: right problems) and show a willingness to discard the moronic idea of FW being training-wheels for null (when its more like the other way around Smile). They proposed giving us a blog with plans/ideas as compensation, but the guy in question must never have made it out of Russia.
I think there has only been the one FW RT and it was all about exploits and major obstacles (we/FW were young) to fun and didn't really touch upon mechanics of the thing, which is why the feeling of abandonment reared its head when CCP didn't show.
Cearain wrote:
I actually find it somewhat surreal that I have to argue that fw shouldn't be postponed any longer. 3 years of a broken mechanic should be long enough.

I know and I am not doing it lightly, do note that I said they should release it as a staged expansion. Chances are that they have planned out the 2nd/3rd stage (ie. the spring modules) to contain null fixes and will merely shuffle some FW things around in the 1st and call it 'done' (Read: I challenge CCP to prove me wrong!) .. a few extra months of deliberations will do wonders for what is eventually sent out.
Cearain wrote:
And why does ccp need to be cautious?...

Because FW is already a giant mash-up of code from everywhere else, put together to fit in with the failed idea of pointless occupancy .. by all means, they can be as creative as they can be as long as we get something meaningful out of it. We all want the same things; mechanics to encourage the fun small scale fights as well opportunities for big blow-outs, relatively easy access to funds and something to do when neither are applicable.
Cearain wrote:
Fixing plexing, fixing alliances, add some things to the lp store and that alone would make for a great expansion ... But I don't see why they can't put a dozen devs on it and get allot of good things done in the next 4 months.

That paragraph is exactly why I want it postponed. We have been ignored and neglected so long that people (didn't expect you to be among them though Sad) have given up the fight and are ready to settle for scraps and make massive compromises. Well, I am not ready to sell my soul just yet.
Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#11 - 2011-10-07 13:35:04 UTC  |  Edited by: Cearain
Hirana Yoshida wrote:
Cearain wrote:
.."About roundtables"..

I would be happy knowing that they actually have a grasp on the problems (read: right problems) and show a willingness to discard the moronic idea of FW being training-wheels for null (when its more like the other way around Smile). They proposed giving us a blog with plans/ideas as compensation, but the guy in question must never have made it out of Russia.


I really don't care what "they" (remember ccp has allot of people with different views) think of fw vis a vis null sec.

I just want them to fix it so that when I join a huge war I am not warping around in my vexor for over an hour looking for something to shoot at.


I joined this huge war and you would think that pilots would constantly be needed throughout the 8 regions in conflict. Yet I log on and I am always just supposed to go randomly wandering around searching for something to shoot at.

This is a major problem with eve as a whole - and why allot of veteran players get bored with it. Surely ccp has some clue about this huge problem with eve, and sees they can use the fw plexxing mechanic to correct this.

Ultimately ccp makes these decisions. If they threw this up for debate nothing would ever get done. One thing we both agree on is that the players all have different views of how fw should be fixed.

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

Hirana Yoshida
Behavioral Affront
#12 - 2011-10-07 14:34:31 UTC
Not asking for a debate, merely assurances that they have even the faintest clue as to what they want to do. That is the big problem, they have offered nothing but silence and have by their own admission not done any actual thinking on the subject at all other than move the development slot around ..

I for one do not believe in Hail Mary's in the 11th hour, the two I have experienced in my life were down to dumb blind luck, so I quite simply do not believe that they can do FW justice in the time allowed by all the other items on the FiS back-log.
Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#13 - 2011-10-07 15:02:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Cearain
Hirana Yoshida wrote:
Not asking for a debate, merely assurances that they have even the faintest clue as to what they want to do. ...


Since we all disagree on how it should be fixed, it appears that whatever they say will lead to one group of the playres saying they are reassured and the other saying ccp has no clue. Then what? Will that change anything?

Hirana Yoshida wrote:

That is the big problem, they have offered nothing but silence and have by their own admission not done any actual thinking on the subject at all other than move the development slot around ...


Thats not entirely true. CCP soundwave was asked in a pod cast about a year ago along the lines of "if he could work on anything in eve what would it be." He said it would be faction warfare. I think he has an idea of where he wants this to go. Moreover the devs recently posted that they had ideas that were already pretty viscous and they just need them to harden up a bit more before posting them.

Yes they need to get everyone at ccp on board before they post the details, but that doesn't mean they haven't even thought about FW.

Seriously Hirana, we don't need to give them any excuse to further delay work on faction war. They need to get their ideas out there and if it still sucks, change it again. Iterations. Eve has been constantly worked on over the years. If fw were all of eve it would be eve in 2004. Yes there is going to be some mistakes along the way of fixing it but they need to get on with it.

The plexing mechanic is sufficiently ugly that its hard to see how any sort of plastic surgery will actually make it uglier. As long as they don't completely scrap the plexes it's hard to see how they can make it much worse.

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

CCP Phantom
C C P
C C P Alliance
#14 - 2011-10-07 15:13:14 UTC
Thread cleaned from off-topic posts.

CCP Phantom - Senior Community Developer

Grath Telkin
Amok.
Goonswarm Federation
#15 - 2011-10-07 19:21:17 UTC
CCP Phantom wrote:
Thread cleaned from off-topic posts.



I've never been cleaned by another man before, I'm not sure how I feel about this.

Malcanis - Without drone assign, the slowcat doctrine will wither and die.