These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

With the planned changes to Mining ships, can we finally fix jetcans?

First post
Author
Skippermonkey
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#1 - 2012-06-14 15:22:19 UTC
I'll keep this short;

Miners are the biggest users of jetcans, and use them to increase their cargo capacity beyond the ships original design

The new ships focus on differing cargo capacity depending on which ship you choose to fly

Keeping the current jetcan 'facility' in its current form sidesteps this slightly. The current capacity of jetcans is laughable, being the same no matter what the size of cargohold the originating ship had.

I propose that jetcans be 'shrinkwrapped' to whatever it is being jettisoned, so the size of the jetcan perfectly contains what was jettisoned with no 'extra capacity'.

(Note, i am not campaigning to remove jetcans, or even their use in mining, just the unexplanably large capacity of them)

feel free to discuss

(And no, this wasnt posted in Features and Ideas, because thats where good idea go to die)

COME AT ME BRO

I'LL JUST BE DOCKED IN THIS STATION

Ban Bindy
Bindy Brothers Pottery Association
True Reign
#2 - 2012-06-14 15:23:27 UTC
What's the purpose for this idea? Why?
Skippermonkey
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#3 - 2012-06-14 15:31:08 UTC
Its something that needs changing in my opinion

How do you explain dropping a container out of your Ibis that can contain more than a vanilla Itty 5?

COME AT ME BRO

I'LL JUST BE DOCKED IN THIS STATION

Savage Angel
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#4 - 2012-06-14 15:33:55 UTC
Skippermonkey wrote:
I'll keep this short;

Miners are the biggest users of jetcans, and use them to increase their cargo capacity beyond the ships original design

The new ships focus on differing cargo capacity depending on which ship you choose to fly

Keeping the current jetcan 'facility' in its current form sidesteps this slightly. The current capacity of jetcans is laughable, being the same no matter what the size of cargohold the originating ship had.

I propose that jetcans be 'shrinkwrapped' to whatever it is being jettisoned, so the size of the jetcan perfectly contains what was jettisoned with no 'extra capacity'.

(Note, i am not campaigning to remove jetcans, or even their use in mining, just the unexplanably large capacity of them)

feel free to discuss

(And no, this wasnt posted in Features and Ideas, because thats where good idea go to die)


I take it you have never mined in a covetor. Also, you can only jettison a new can so often.
Erinn Sylvanus
NovaTech Universal
#5 - 2012-06-14 15:34:21 UTC
I've always imagined it's not really a "can", but more like a big mylar bag. That's why you have tons of them - they take up no space when folded.

Being mylar-ish, they are fragile and get torn after a short while (2 hours).
Savage Angel
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#6 - 2012-06-14 15:35:02 UTC
Skippermonkey wrote:
Its something that needs changing in my opinion

How do you explain dropping a container out of your Ibis that can contain more than a vanilla Itty 5?


They are inflatable. That is why they don't last very long, are so big, and you have an unlimited supply of them.

Edit: beaten to the punch.
Skippermonkey
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#7 - 2012-06-14 15:43:24 UTC
Savage Angel wrote:
I take it you have never mined in a covetor. Also, you can only jettison a new can so often.

I have, but thats beside the point

COME AT ME BRO

I'LL JUST BE DOCKED IN THIS STATION

Savage Angel
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#8 - 2012-06-14 15:44:39 UTC
Skippermonkey wrote:
Savage Angel wrote:
I take it you have never mined in a covetor. Also, you can only jettison a new can so often.

I have, but thats beside the point


So how do you expect anyone to use that ship without a can? It can barely hold one cycle of the lasers.
Skippermonkey
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#9 - 2012-06-14 15:46:37 UTC  |  Edited by: Skippermonkey
Savage Angel wrote:
Skippermonkey wrote:
Savage Angel wrote:
I take it you have never mined in a covetor. Also, you can only jettison a new can so often.

I have, but thats beside the point


So how do you expect anyone to use that ship without a can? It can barely hold one cycle of the lasers.


Maybe read the latest devblog and then work within the limitations of the ship given to you?

edit - also, re-read what i have set out in the original post. your jet can mining will remain if you so wish, just shrinkwrapped to the same size as what you jettison.(..and if this means i have to do the thinking for you, just jettison a can when you are nearly full)

COME AT ME BRO

I'LL JUST BE DOCKED IN THIS STATION

Savage Angel
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#10 - 2012-06-14 15:50:19 UTC
Skippermonkey wrote:
Savage Angel wrote:
Skippermonkey wrote:
Savage Angel wrote:
I take it you have never mined in a covetor. Also, you can only jettison a new can so often.

I have, but thats beside the point


So how do you expect anyone to use that ship without a can? It can barely hold one cycle of the lasers.


Maybe read the latest devblog and then work within the limitations of the ship given to you?


It says they will not change the hold of the covetor/hulk, making the covetor completely worthless as a mining platform without a good transfer method.

Why would you give the biggest yield to the ships with the smallest holds if they have to either dock up constantly or wait for a new can? Would you allow unlimited cans in space? That would lag the servers out, and is something CCP has always tried to avoid and will take action against.
Skippermonkey
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#11 - 2012-06-14 15:58:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Skippermonkey
Savage Angel wrote:
Why would you give the biggest yield to the ships with the smallest holds if they have to either dock up constantly or wait for a new can? Would you allow unlimited cans in space? That would lag the servers out, and is something CCP has always tried to avoid and will take action against.

The first step in understanding this is to totally forget about ship tiers. The changes will reflect a balance in the risk/reward in your ship choice

The max yield miners will have the smallest holds, this just means you have to work as a team in moving that ore to an Orca / station. TEAMWORK being the codeword here. Jettison your ore when your cargohold is enarly full and sombody can pick it up, and then repeat ad infinitum until you die from veldpsar exposure.

The retreiver/Mack is going to be the best ship to use if you are a solo operation, requirign less trips to store the ore somewhere.

The procurer/Skiff is going to be for the paranoid

edit

Savage Angel wrote:
It says they will not change the hold of the covetor/hulk, making the covetor completely worthless as a mining platform without a good transfer method.
The changes actually make the Covetor a BETTER choice, as it will be available from the instant you train Mining Barge. The perfect choice if you intend to mine in a fleet.

COME AT ME BRO

I'LL JUST BE DOCKED IN THIS STATION

Skippermonkey
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#12 - 2012-06-14 16:03:03 UTC
Also your comment about having to wait for a new can...

Whats the timer on a new can, two mins?

Does it take less than 2 mins to fill up a Hulk or Covetors hold? (I really dont know this one)

COME AT ME BRO

I'LL JUST BE DOCKED IN THIS STATION

CCP Phantom
C C P
C C P Alliance
#13 - 2012-06-14 16:03:41 UTC
Moved from EVE General Discussion.

CCP Phantom - Senior Community Developer

Degren
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#14 - 2012-06-14 16:03:50 UTC
9/10

Hello, hello again.

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#15 - 2012-06-14 16:05:27 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
Savage Angel wrote:
Why would you give the biggest yield to the ships with the smallest holds if they have to either dock up constantly or wait for a new can?
Because the ship is meant to be used in groups. You will never have to wait for a new can, because the strip miner cycle time is longer than the can jettison delay (and since it takes two cycles to fill up the ore hold), and you already have a good transfer method called “the Orca”.
Skippermonkey
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#16 - 2012-06-14 16:09:18 UTC
skippermonkey wrote:
(And no, this wasnt posted in Features and Ideas, because thats where good idea go to die)


CCP Phantom wrote:
Moved from EVE General Discussion.


NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

COME AT ME BRO

I'LL JUST BE DOCKED IN THIS STATION

Dave stark
#17 - 2012-06-14 16:18:06 UTC
no, the way i understand it is that the largest cargo bay amongst the exhumers will be the same as a jetcan, therefore the ship with max yield will have an ore bay smaller than a jetcan, along with the fact that i mine 2+ jetcans at a time means i'll still be jet can mining.

so let's not **** up jet cans please.
Skippermonkey
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#18 - 2012-06-14 16:20:06 UTC
Dave stark wrote:
no, the way i understand it is that the largest cargo bay amongst the exhumers will be the same as a jetcan, therefore the ship with max yield will have an ore bay smaller than a jetcan, along with the fact that i mine 2+ jetcans at a time means i'll still be jet can mining.

so let's not **** up jet cans please.


jet cans ARE ****ed up, thats the point

COME AT ME BRO

I'LL JUST BE DOCKED IN THIS STATION

Lady Ayeipsia
BlueWaffe
#19 - 2012-06-14 16:31:59 UTC
The problem with the original post is that the op assumes the only use of jet cans are to dump ore into. There are other uses. During a pos bash in wormhole space, you will often see jet cans used to store ammo. I have seen the same in low sec too. In both cases, the ship dropping off the ammo may be a covert ops hauler, and may make a few trips to a near by station in hi sec it another pos to fill the jet can. The op's proposal would require the yse if multiple cans, when one worked fine.

Additionally, people use jet cans at times to transfer loot. I'm running sites while my partner sets up a pos. I come back to the pos and drop loot in a jet can so I have room for more. I would have to kick out a new jet can each time, cluttering up space.

Or I am in a noctis, salvaging a large mission. I pull the wrecks in, salvage, collect loot, and jet can to hold more. My friend in an industrial ship warps to me, empties the can, leaving 1 item, I keep filling up the same can with what I pull in.

What bothers me on a more personal level is that the op is requesting a mechanic change for asthetic reasons without a full understanding of why jet cans may be used. It's not just for ore and changes shouldn't be made just because one feels the source doesn't make sense.
Vincent Athena
Photosynth
#20 - 2012-06-14 16:33:48 UTC
Skippermonkey wrote:
Its something that needs changing in my opinion

How do you explain dropping a container out of your Ibis that can contain more than a vanilla Itty 5?


A plastic bag will fit in my pocket. But when deployed will hold far far more than could fit in my pocket.

Know a Frozen fan? Check this out

Frozen fanfiction

12Next page