EVE General Discussion

Eh? Did you even read his post or are you so blinded by your own agenda that you just see arguments that aren't there?

This is revealing, and explains what at first seemed to be irrational hatred for people playing in High Sec.

Somebody can't stand the though that someone else might be having more fun. Or at least too much fun.

There are a couple pathologies that involve that kind of thinking. Not that this would be diagnostic of course.

You're simply incorrect (probably blinded by your own biased posistions on the matter).

My motto is live and let live. I don't CARE what others do as long as they play by the rules and aren't hacking lol.

If a person want to solo mine in high sec, no skin off my back, I am NOT in the "push people to low sec" crowd.

However, i find it stupid that people can't understand that their choices have consequences.

I choose to go to nul sec, to put up with corp and alliance politics, to sometimes have to pvp to help my buddies when I might rather just blitz anoms and watch nice wallet ticks.

I choose to have to insall TS3 and Jabber and all that noise, i understand that by making choices, I lose out on other things.

And I don't complain, because they were MY choices. And because I and others like me made those choices, we should reap the additional rewards of the game, over and above those offered to people who choose otherwise (as is their right).

But you high sec players CHOOSE relative safety, relative convienience and to avoid the (political and logistical) headaches of null. That's fine, as long as you accept the downsides of the choice as well and don't come here complaining that ccp denies you the physical impossiblitiy of possessing cake and consuming it at the same time......

This is called "reading what you want into something".

I never mentioned pvp. By content I mean everything (I guess pvp can be included). I'm talking plexes,, things like incursions, isk making oppurtunites ect ect.

If you accept that things like isk making (and "power mining in hulks") should be less available and less profitible the safer the space, we have no arguement.

I don't want people to pvp if they don't want to, understanding still that this is a pvp game and pvp should not be totally unavoidable.

The issue with the statement is that it becomes subjective when considering what people regard as the best content, especially when this game counts player interaction as part of that content. That being the case, market access could be considered better content by some than 10/10 DED complexes, baiting mission runners better than nullsec roaming, or hulkageddon more entertaining than a SOV bash. It has nothing to do with PvP vs PvE as you said, but calling null "the best content the game has to offer" is subjective and for those who choose to live in high, probably a false statement.

Ask not what they can do for you...

Why don't you go and play COD

"Should" says otherwise.

Ah, gotcha. I am truly interested in seeing what part a purely industrial character could play in an alliance though, and what sorts of protection they could offer. I of course would be willing to contribute to their overall goals in return. If anyone cares to address that questions, I am willing to hear them out.

You had me at crying, and then I left.
Seriously, don't take up marketing.