These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Ships & Modules

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

Review of Assault Frig prices

Author
Mai Amarr Waifu
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#1 - 2012-06-03 15:11:18 UTC
So, with recent changes and buffs to assault frigs, the prices of the hulls for these has gone through the roof to the point where they're no longer cost effective as ships. Does anyone know if CCP has planned a review of assault frig production costs to bring them down to a reasonable cost:effectiveness ratio? As of right now most assault frigs hover around the 32-35m isk mark for the hull alone - this makes them completely ineffective when compared to the cost effectiveness of T1 frigates - and they don't retain that much more survivability or dps to show for the extreme cost.

For Comparison, a Cyclone that can do 500~ dps and tank 800~ without overheating or links runs about the same price as a fully fitted Enyo. I know there's a large training time discression, but that's even more to the point that they should be re-evaluated in terms of cost effectiveness, as more new players can easily get into the advanced frigates and the progression from a frigate to an t2 assault frigate is much easier than from a frigate to a t2 battlecruiser.

So in summary, why are battlecruisers ending up cheaper to fly than t2 assault frigates? Can this be looked at by CCP? Will it be looked at by CCP?

Thanks in advance.
Gaymes Jibson
Doomheim
#2 - 2012-06-03 15:21:52 UTC
This needs to be looked at, how is the average eve player supposed to learn in and play these kinds of ships if they cost this much and die so easily?
Lunkwill Khashour
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#3 - 2012-06-03 15:23:13 UTC
You'll need some micro economics 101.

The materials needed to produce an AF are exactly the same as they always have been so that doesn't need changing.


Let me ask you this question: Did you buy an AF at the current prices?

If NO then you're helping to bring AF prices down, you won't get to fly them however.
If YES then you think the high price is justified no matter how much you complain about it on the forums. You're also helping to keep the prices at their current rate.

The only input from CCP that you can expect is some nerf/boost to technetium.
mxzf
Shovel Bros
#4 - 2012-06-03 15:23:26 UTC
The current AF prices are a combination of a few factors:
1. The AF buff made them somewhat more popular
2. A giant wave of mining bot banning at around the same time as Hulkageddon starting vastly reduced the mining workforce, which drove up the mineral prices
3. OTEC is increasing Tech prices, which is used in T2 production

So, yes, they are up in price, but it's not just from the AF buff, it's due to vast market manipulation (unintended with the bot banning, intentional with Hulkageddon and OTEC).
Mai Amarr Waifu
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#5 - 2012-06-03 15:24:32 UTC  |  Edited by: Mai Amarr Waifu
Lunkwill Khashour wrote:
You'll need some micro economics 101.

The materials needed to produce an AF are exactly the same as they always have been so that doesn't need changing.


Let me ask you this question: Did you buy an AF at the current prices?

If NO then you're helping to bring AF prices down, you won't get to fly them however.
If YES then you think the high price is justified no matter how much you complain about it on the forums. You're also helping to keep the prices at their current rate.

The only input from CCP that you can expect is some nerf/boost to technetium.


If that's true why were Retributions only 12m isk pre-patch and now are 32m post patch? Btw, Datacores are more expensive due to the fw changes, so perhaps invention has adjusted for the massive increase in cost?
Steam Cat
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#6 - 2012-06-03 15:26:04 UTC  |  Edited by: Steam Cat
Because the costs of making t2 items has gone up due to OTEC (presumably) as well as hulkageddon, as well as the current miner bots being borked and banned. If you pay attention most t2 items have been on an upward slope. Don't like it? Go take some tech moons, do some mining and produce it cheaper.

You'll have plenty of buyers.
Mai Amarr Waifu
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#7 - 2012-06-03 15:29:30 UTC
Steam Cat wrote:
Because the costs of making t2 items has gone up due to OTEC (presumably) as well as hulkageddon, as well as the current miner bots being borked and banned. If you pay attention most t2 items have been on an upward slope. Don't like it? Go take some tech moons, do some mining and produce it cheaper.

You'll have plenty of buyers.


This is true to a point, but it cannnot account for a nearly 250% increase in prices. For instance, the zealot has been raised in cost by about 8-10% from the last major patch.
Gaymes Jibson
Doomheim
#8 - 2012-06-03 15:32:14 UTC
Steam Cat wrote:
Because the costs of making t2 items has gone up due to OTEC (presumably) as well as hulkageddon, as well as the current miner bots being borked and banned. If you pay attention most t2 items have been on an upward slope. Don't like it? Go take some tech moons, do some mining and produce it cheaper.

You'll have plenty of buyers.



That's not very good advice, I don't think anyone here could stand up to any of the large entities that have their claws sunk in to every scanned tech moon in New Eden.
Steam Cat
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#9 - 2012-06-03 15:36:07 UTC
Mai Amarr Waifu wrote:
Steam Cat wrote:
Because the costs of making t2 items has gone up due to OTEC (presumably) as well as hulkageddon, as well as the current miner bots being borked and banned. If you pay attention most t2 items have been on an upward slope. Don't like it? Go take some tech moons, do some mining and produce it cheaper.

You'll have plenty of buyers.


This is true to a point, but it cannnot account for a nearly 250% increase in prices. For instance, the zealot has been raised in cost by about 8-10% from the last major patch.


Actually you can, demand is high (due to buffs and being naturally good ships) for these rather nice frigates and the prices of materials are up (for the above or other reasons). The market supports these prices by the sales, therefore the price is where it should be. Its not like you need t2 ships to be competitive. In fact most of the time (except t2 guns/ammo/points) you can get a better item at meta 4 (like ecm jammers) for the same or lower prices.

Don't mindlessly buy t2 and the market will respond eventually, its not always the best option. Here have a wiki article.
Steam Cat
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#10 - 2012-06-03 15:37:22 UTC
Gaymes Jibson wrote:

That's not very good advice, I don't think anyone here could stand up to any of the large entities that have their claws sunk in to every scanned tech moon in New Eden.

Hey, who are we to judge, this person might be the next mittani ready to lead the market to a new lower priced heaven!
Vilnius Zar
SDC Multi Ten
#11 - 2012-06-03 15:39:03 UTC  |  Edited by: Vilnius Zar
Prices are player driven and depend on supply&demand for both the minerals required as the produced ships themselves. Why should CCP have to look at that? If you feel that the prices are too damn high, why don't you start (moon)mining and producing those ships, more supply means lower prices. Go for it.
Mai Amarr Waifu
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#12 - 2012-06-03 15:40:26 UTC
Tbh my main is Womyn Power and the CEO of Love Squad who specialize in flying inexpensive completely t1 fit ships. I'm just saying in the end the cost effectiveness of t2 frigates vs their general effectiveness overall makes them not worth flying - not when you can buy 50~ thrashers for the same cost fully fitted. There needs to be a better middle ground or these ships wont ever be used to their full usefulness considering how insanely overpriced they are. I'm just frustrated I suppose that market manipulation has completely ruined the t2 'fighting' frig market. I just hope this same **** doesn't end up effecting Interceptors and Stealth Bombers - as they're both fairly cost effective and useful in their specific roles.
Mai Amarr Waifu
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#13 - 2012-06-03 15:41:26 UTC
Vilnius Zar wrote:
Prices are player driven and depend on supply&demand for both the minerals required as the produced ships themselves. Why should CCP have to look at that? If you feel that the prices are too damn high, why don't you start (moon)mining and producing those ships, more supply means lower prices. Go for it.


Because ships that are the logical stepping stones to the next tier of ships (frigates to cruisers) shouldn't be prohibitively expensive when compared to their overall effectiveness as ships.
Gaymes Jibson
Doomheim
#14 - 2012-06-03 15:42:18 UTC
Vilnius Zar wrote:
Prices are player driven and depend on supply&demand for both the minerals required as the produced ships themselves. Why should CCP have to look at that? If you feel that the prices are too damn high, why don't you start (moon)mining and producing those ships, more supply means lower prices. Go for it.



Why don't you own a tech moon then?
Vilnius Zar
SDC Multi Ten
#15 - 2012-06-03 15:44:03 UTC
Since when are AFs logical stepping stones towards a cruiser? they might be a prereq for some bigger ships but that doesn't make them a stepping stone. Actually in eve there ARE no logical stepping stones at all, there is no natural progression in ship types or sizes. All there is is specialisation.

If you feel that you are entitled to Fly AFs at a low cost because they're "a logical step up to other ships" them uhm... yeah. If you want prices to drop then don't buy them or start producing them, there's nothing more to it.
Vilnius Zar
SDC Multi Ten
#16 - 2012-06-03 15:55:46 UTC  |  Edited by: Vilnius Zar
Gaymes Jibson wrote:
Vilnius Zar wrote:
Prices are player driven and depend on supply&demand for both the minerals required as the produced ships themselves. Why should CCP have to look at that? If you feel that the prices are too damn high, why don't you start (moon)mining and producing those ships, more supply means lower prices. Go for it.



Why don't you own a tech moon then?


Because I'm not whining about the prices, even though I'm no producer or trader.

Sure stuff costs a bit but anyone who has played for years when we had the T2 BPO cartels will tell you that even right now we have it easy. T2 damage controls cost a fortune, Hulks were 500 mil and apart from that people had a lot less isk and easy income. So uhm yeah, you don't see me whining about it.

If you don't understand or agree to the player driven way of how EVE and the market works, and want CCP to step in to make it easier for you then perhaps you're playing the wrong game.
Eternal Error
Doomheim
#17 - 2012-06-03 16:22:22 UTC
This is hardly an issue limited to AFs; most of the T2 hulls right now are stupid in terms of cost. CCP needs to rebalance moon mining and they have acknowledged that it is an issue (although not due to cost, just due to the nullsec mechanics), but who knows when that will happen.
Tankn00blicus
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#18 - 2012-06-03 17:15:28 UTC
Eternal Error wrote:
This is hardly an issue limited to AFs; most of the T2 hulls right now are stupid in terms of cost. CCP needs to rebalance moon mining and they have acknowledged that it is an issue (although not due to cost, just due to the nullsec mechanics), but who knows when that will happen.
Planet ring mining, coming soon (probably in Valve time).
Lunkwill Khashour
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#19 - 2012-06-03 18:05:15 UTC
Mai Amarr Waifu wrote:
Steam Cat wrote:
Because the costs of making t2 items has gone up due to OTEC (presumably) as well as hulkageddon, as well as the current miner bots being borked and banned. If you pay attention most t2 items have been on an upward slope. Don't like it? Go take some tech moons, do some mining and produce it cheaper.

You'll have plenty of buyers.


This is true to a point, but it cannnot account for a nearly 250% increase in prices. For instance, the zealot has been raised in cost by about 8-10% from the last major patch.


If you're really interested, you should start by breaking down the ships in their cost to produce (including invention) and compared this cost to what is was some time ago. Ideally you'ld do this for all T2 frigs and some similar T2 and T1 ships to get a base to compare to. At this point you can apply some statistics to see wether or nether AF prices are an outlier atm or not.

The thing is, if you understand what I just typed, you'll also understand why they're expensive atm anyways so there's no point in doing this.

If you don't fly an AF worth flying, then don't. Simple as that. Tech nerf is incoming (one day)
Abdiel Kavash
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#20 - 2012-06-03 21:20:01 UTC
Eternal Error wrote:
This is hardly an issue limited to AFs; most of the T2 hulls right now are stupid in terms of cost. CCP needs to rebalance moon mining and they have acknowledged that it is an issue (although not due to cost, just due to the nullsec mechanics), but who knows when that will happen.


Prices are what they are because people are consistently buying the ships at those prices. If nobody found the prices reasonable, nobody would buy them and manufacturers would have to lower their prices. But they sell, so clearly many people find them cost-effective. If you don't, fine, don't fly them. But don't complain to CCP to change game mechanics to make things cheaper for you.
12Next page