These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123Next page
 

Thanks for the fishes

First post
Author
Nevigrofnu Mrots
Goonswarm Federation
#21 - 2012-06-01 15:24:35 UTC  |  Edited by: Nevigrofnu Mrots
Ruareve wrote:
I'm not one for the politics of Eve. I don't pirate, don't care for drama or tears, and I don't normally get involved in the "metagame". I just log in when I'm not deployed and enjoy spending time with friends and flying around doing fun stuff.

Last year I heard about the AT on Eve Radio and I gave it a look. I have to admit I really enjoyed the fights and the theorycraft involved in coming up with team configurations. I was really looking forward to this years competition since I understood more about what would happen and could actually follow the fights.

Then I see a blog post about CCP banning last years winners. Something I can't blame them for doing as the entire tournament last year ended on a bad note with the laughable last match. I read the initial posts about the ban, posts which have now been pulled down, and I thought CCP had a pretty valid reason behind their justification. As I've pointed out in my blog CCP seemed to be protecting the spirit of the tournament while not exactly enforcing the letter of the rules. While somewhat dubious in nature I could understand the logic behind CCP's actions.

Today my opinion changed when I read Dev postings stating the rules were intentionally left vague and the actions Hydra and Outbreak took on Sisi aren't against the rules but everyone should be careful just in case.

Now I believe CCP wasn't protecting the spirit of the tournament, rather they were simply not willing to man up and just ban Hydra and Outbreak for last year's actions. CCP deliberately created rules which could be interpreted several different ways by the player base, CCP seemed to ignore requests for clarification from Hydra and Outbreak while reaching out to other Alliances, and then we are told the reason Hydra and Outbreak were banned isn't actually against the rules.

I have no idea why CCP didn't just HTFU and tell Hydra and Outbreak they were banned because they made a joke out of the final match last year. Simple, concise and no drama. Give participants a warning that every match must be contested or you'll get kicked out of the tournament and not be allowed to enter next year.

Instead we get vague rules, removed posts, insulting replies from both CCP and the players, and in the end the AT feels tainted without a single shot being fired.

In a game that touts itself as rough and tumble, no holds barred, not for the faint of heart, I can't figure out why CCP has seemly gone out of it's way to try and look like a good guy when simply taking the bull by the horns would have avoided all manner of ill feelings.


Look, another Hydra/Outbreak groupie tears thread!

*popcorn*

you all are just embarrassing yourselfs, if it was a main or alt of Hydra/Outbreak doing this, I would give it a discount, but tears coming from groupies, now that is just so adorable and pathetic at the same time. Please give us more, I'm having fun and you?
Ruareve
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#22 - 2012-06-01 15:53:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Ruareve
Removed due to being pathetic.

Yet another blog about Eve- http://ruar-eve.blogspot.com/

CCP Soundwave
C C P
C C P Alliance
#23 - 2012-06-01 15:55:03 UTC
This is getting so pathetic.
Mystic Bull
Chaos From Order
#24 - 2012-06-01 15:57:12 UTC
Apparently only Hydra and Outbreak were confused Big smile The rest of us understand perfectly Cool
EvilweaselSA
GoonCorp
Goonswarm Federation
#25 - 2012-06-01 16:02:57 UTC
CCP Soundwave wrote:
"General consensus" in this case means "a few Hydra/Outbreak alts"?

stop stealing my posts
Intigo
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#26 - 2012-06-01 16:08:09 UTC
Mystic Bull wrote:
Apparently only Hydra and Outbreak were confused Big smile The rest of us understand perfectly Cool


Really now?

hydra provail

Raimo
Genos Occidere
HYDRA RELOADED
#27 - 2012-06-01 17:48:32 UTC  |  Edited by: Raimo
CCP Soundwave wrote:
This is getting so pathetic.


"Getting"?

And OP, unnecessary edit, your thread was spot on. Quoting it just for posterity

Ruareve wrote:
I'm not one for the politics of Eve. I don't pirate, don't care for drama or tears, and I don't normally get involved in the "metagame". I just log in when I'm not deployed and enjoy spending time with friends and flying around doing fun stuff.

Last year I heard about the AT on Eve Radio and I gave it a look. I have to admit I really enjoyed the fights and the theorycraft involved in coming up with team configurations. I was really looking forward to this years competition since I understood more about what would happen and could actually follow the fights.

Then I see a blog post about CCP banning last years winners. Something I can't blame them for doing as the entire tournament last year ended on a bad note with the laughable last match. I read the initial posts about the ban, posts which have now been pulled down, and I thought CCP had a pretty valid reason behind their justification. As I've pointed out in my blog CCP seemed to be protecting the spirit of the tournament while not exactly enforcing the letter of the rules. While somewhat dubious in nature I could understand the logic behind CCP's actions.

Today my opinion changed when I read Dev postings stating the rules were intentionally left vague and the actions Hydra and Outbreak took on Sisi aren't against the rules but everyone should be careful just in case.

Now I believe CCP wasn't protecting the spirit of the tournament, rather they were simply not willing to man up and just ban Hydra and Outbreak for last year's actions. CCP deliberately created rules which could be interpreted several different ways by the player base, CCP seemed to ignore requests for clarification from Hydra and Outbreak while reaching out to other Alliances, and then we are told the reason Hydra and Outbreak were banned isn't actually against the rules.

I have no idea why CCP didn't just HTFU and tell Hydra and Outbreak they were banned because they made a joke out of the final match last year. Simple, concise and no drama. Give participants a warning that every match must be contested or you'll get kicked out of the tournament and not be allowed to enter next year.

Instead we get vague rules, removed posts, insulting replies from both CCP and the players, and in the end the AT feels tainted without a single shot being fired.

In a game that touts itself as rough and tumble, no holds barred, not for the faint of heart, I can't figure out why CCP has seemly gone out of it's way to try and look like a good guy when simply taking the bull by the horns would have avoided all manner of ill feelings.


(Well ok I disagree on the bit where you wanted them to just ban us right away)
Cody Zamorah
Doomheim
#28 - 2012-06-01 17:52:45 UTC
CCP Soundwave wrote:
This is getting so pathetic.


Admitance is the first step to getting cured.
Zach Donnell
Ghost-Busters
#29 - 2012-06-01 18:05:54 UTC
CCP Soundwave wrote:
"General consensus" in this case means "a few Hydra/Outbreak alts"?


Yes.

See all these comments from players of different alliances. They are all Hydra/OB alts.

There are actually ~10 Hydra/OB alt alliances in the tourney, hellbent on throwing not just the final match, but the entire final day. This would not have happened if you could have effectively communicated with your players, and not played favorites.

Out of the frying pan and into the flame, CCP. You heard it here first.
Randomize All
Doomheim
#30 - 2012-06-01 18:20:00 UTC
CCP Soundwave wrote:
This is getting so pathetic.

But holding a grudge for over a year is manly?

You and your loyal customers are getting the tournaments they deserve now. Nice, predictable, pointless tournament where any notion of wrong doing is well hidden by CCP on behalf of their biggest customers.
Grath Telkin
Amok.
Goonswarm Federation
#31 - 2012-06-01 18:33:00 UTC
Miss Raven Bandit wrote:

PL without a doubt were the Main Alliance of their two entries and fell foul of the stacking the dec rule yet the Main alliance was not removed.


Nobody seems to understand that Hydra wasn't removed because of the B team rule. The B team rule allows the A team to continue (its plainly spelled out in the rules) unless the offense is very grave (3-4 teams ect).

Hydra was removed for colluding with Outbreak.


You can say we can't guess their intent, but we don't have to guess their intent, they did the exact same thing, and I do mean the EXACT same thing last year when they colluded to win the tournament. Last year that was legal, this year it isn't. Their emails were purposely vague, if they had said "Can we join a single corp on the test server for testing", the answer undoubtedly would have been a resounding NO, something they should have simply known to be the case after a rule was specifically put in because of them and what they did last year.

Malcanis - Without drone assign, the slowcat doctrine will wither and die.

Larkonis Trassler
Doctrine.
FEARLESS.
#32 - 2012-06-01 19:11:02 UTC
I've said it before and I'll say it again. You know what...

I've no real beef with Hydra or Outbreak.

Last year two amazing teams played the game (in and out) well to succeed. They could have been defeated at any point but they weren't thanks to the sheer amount of effort they put in on and off the field. They deserved their spots. However, they both got to the final and left egg on everyone's face. The rules were changed because of it (much like the membership time rules were changed because of something I did, it's called evolution mates) I don't blame CCP for having a grudge, in fact, they were pretty tolerant. This year people know what is up and they have done a reverse A&B team and collaborated to the max on SISI. This, in itself might not be an issue but to be honest...

It was pretty dumb. They got caught out and given their history they got punished. They should have at least waiting out for confirmed positions before pulling off this serious testing, after all, we've still got four weeks to practice.

The tournament will suffer for not having two of the best teams out there playing in it but I think it will also benefit from not having two of the best teams out there in it.

Kail Toronus
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#33 - 2012-06-01 19:12:04 UTC
What is the difference between two teams joining a dummy corp on a test server to practice compared to two teams doing a scrimmage against each other for the sake of practice, other than the "tag" associated with the pilots?

I'm not picking sides here and I could care less what the outcome is/was I'm just honestly asking for a logical response, call it a clarification if you must, to what was really done "wrong".


I am an avid fan of the AT's, I've watched them every year and it is one of the things that keeps me coming back to Eve time and time again. I was one of the outraged players last year because of the final match, it pissed me off to no end. However, I see no way to truly prevent a repeat of what was done last year if the players choose to make it happen.

Each team knows who they are about to fight, and its a good bet they know who the "key" people are on that team. Quick tells and agreements can be made at any given moment throughout the tournament. We've seen offers to self-destruct to give points to a team in the middle of the tournament with no declaration that doing so would result in being remove from the tournament.

Allen Iverson was spot on when he said "we're talking about practice, practice."

All professional teams have scrimmages even before Pre-Season teams will get together and do half-day workouts to ready themselves for the real thing.

Varsity teams play against JV teams as a warm up and to provide experience for the JV team.

So, again I ask, what does it matter if on a dummy server two known Alliances were practicing against one another under the same tag? If two of the Alliances who got into the tournament run into one another on Tranquility in null sec do they have to leave each other alone from now until the Tournament is over to avoid the same fate? Did Hydra/Outbreak join to the same "team" on Tranquility???

Hydra and Outbreak are two of the best, if not THE best when it comes to the AT. Anyone who competes in ANYTHING will tell you the only way to get better is to compete against the best to hone your skills. I am not a fan of Hydra or Outbreak and don't care that they were removed, I just think the reasoning behind their removal is not only illogical, but actually takes away from the longevity of the tournament because in a way CCP is saying "don't practice, don't get better"... because as already stated, there is no way for CCP to prevent two random teams from making a last second private deal to throw a match.

I hope the other teams who have made it into the Tournament bring a better peformance than they have in the past because as much as I hated last years final match, the play by Hydra and Outbreak leading up to that match were some of the best matches.
Cody Zamorah
Doomheim
#34 - 2012-06-01 19:30:33 UTC
Grath Telkin wrote:
Hydra was removed for colluding with Outbreak.



And you fail to understand the difference between colluding on TQ and cooperating to train on testserver.
Last year they followed the rules. We could also have expected them to follow them this year.
But hurt feelings made that point taken out of the equation
ScoRpS
Moist Wanted.
OnlyFleets.
#35 - 2012-06-01 19:40:32 UTC
The guys at Outbreak get it. We screwed up and just hope that we get a chance to re-enter next year.

Sorry to CCP and all the tournament fans for screwing up and we will endeavour if given the chance to make ammends in 2013 and in the mean time good luck to all in the tournament this year.

Please stop posting on behalf of 0utbreak.
Grath Telkin
Amok.
Goonswarm Federation
#36 - 2012-06-01 20:05:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Grath Telkin
Cody Zamorah wrote:
Grath Telkin wrote:
Hydra was removed for colluding with Outbreak.



And you fail to understand the difference between colluding on TQ and cooperating to train on testserver.
Last year they followed the rules. We could also have expected them to follow them this year.
But hurt feelings made that point taken out of the equation


It seems you don't understand the concept behind the word colluding:

Quote:
Collusion is an agreement between two or more persons, sometimes illegal and therefore secretive, to limit open competition by deceiving, misleading, or defrauding others of their legal rights, or to obtain an objective forbidden by law typically by defrauding or gaining an unfair advantage. It is an agreement among firms to divide the market, set prices, or limit production. It can involve "wage fixing, kickbacks, or misrepresenting the independence of the relationship between the colluding parties". In legal terms, all acts affected by collusion are considered void.


Their attempt to act as a single team on the test server was collusion, they shared intel, fits, tactics, strategies, and yes, they were within the rules last year, however, this year, repeating those same actions resulted in a rules violation because doing what they did last year was against the rules this year.

The rule was basically in effect from the day it was announced, everybody knew that hence all the petitions and questions about it, thus carrying on with what they did last year, which was known to be collusion after the fact, was dumb. It applies to the teams both in and out of game, if you get caught breaking it, you're out, end of discussion. They did it on SiSi, after the rule was announced, which resulted in the expected violation.

You cannot blame anybody but Hydra and Outbreak as the gentleman above me admits, they know what they did wrong, I'm sure next year they'll do the things that need to be done to be in the tournament.

Malcanis - Without drone assign, the slowcat doctrine will wither and die.

Cody Zamorah
Doomheim
#37 - 2012-06-01 21:08:31 UTC
ScoRpS. I am not posting on behalf of Outbreak or Hydra. I am posting because this was clearly very bad decision making due to smokescreen rules and even worse communication.

There where a lot of people just sit back and accept that I won't. Because if we accept it now we might accept the same crap another time even easier.
Cody Zamorah
Doomheim
#38 - 2012-06-01 21:18:02 UTC
Grath Telkin wrote:
Their attempt to act as a single team on the test server was collusion, they shared intel, fits, tactics, strategies, and yes, they were within the rules last year, however, this year, repeating those same actions resulted in a rules violation because doing what they did last year was against the rules this year.


They didn't train secretivly, they petitioned and were open for dialogue with the AT team about how and why. So the secretive part already get's tossed out of the window.
If CCP had simply communicated and said " Your setup of training would break rules and as such you have the choice, continue and be kicked from the AT or find a way to train against eachother within our rules. (you know, the vague ones which leave enough room to be interprited any way suitable)

They were within the rules last year and the thing with EVE is that people always look howfar rules can be bend to their needs or desires. Same was for Hydra and Outbreak.
This doesn't have to mean they now all of a sudden wanted to break the rules this year. Since there were none broken last year I would assume they didn't want to break rules then so they weren't going to break any this year.

They got dealt a harsher hand than RvB purely based on the fact that last year they did something within the rules what however pissed a lot of people off.
With RvB there was clear communication about how to at the very least get both sides into the AT by "adjusting" the rules.
Same could have been done for Hydra/Outbreak, but CCP decided not to. And the conclusion is that this is soley based on hurt feelings over last year.
Grath Telkin
Amok.
Goonswarm Federation
#39 - 2012-06-01 22:07:04 UTC
Cody Zamorah wrote:
Grath Telkin wrote:
Their attempt to act as a single team on the test server was collusion, they shared intel, fits, tactics, strategies, and yes, they were within the rules last year, however, this year, repeating those same actions resulted in a rules violation because doing what they did last year was against the rules this year.


They didn't train secretivly, they petitioned and were open for dialogue with the AT team about how and why. So the secretive part already get's tossed out of the window.
If CCP had simply communicated and said " Your setup of training would break rules and as such you have the choice, continue and be kicked from the AT or find a way to train against eachother within our rules. (you know, the vague ones which leave enough room to be interprited any way suitable)

They were within the rules last year and the thing with EVE is that people always look howfar rules can be bend to their needs or desires. Same was for Hydra and Outbreak.
This doesn't have to mean they now all of a sudden wanted to break the rules this year. Since there were none broken last year I would assume they didn't want to break rules then so they weren't going to break any this year.

They got dealt a harsher hand than RvB purely based on the fact that last year they did something within the rules what however pissed a lot of people off.
With RvB there was clear communication about how to at the very least get both sides into the AT by "adjusting" the rules.
Same could have been done for Hydra/Outbreak, but CCP decided not to. And the conclusion is that this is soley based on hurt feelings over last year.


Find me where anybody insinuated that they trained secretly.

If you were going to rob a bank, got the guns, got the get away car, got IN the car and started the engine, would you expect the police to tell you that what you're doing is wrong before you left??

Can you apply your logic to ANY OTHER SPORTING EVENT OR SCENARIO LIKE THAT AT ALL and expect the officials to go out of their way to tell you that something you're doing thats blatantly against the rules is against the rules?

They should have simply known that CCP were mad at them (everybody knew CCP was mad at them) and carried the burden of playing it safe on their own.

I cannot fathom how you expect somebody to hand hold them and make sure they don't break rules that were obviously created specifically because of what they did, they're grown ass men, they're responsible for their own actions.

Malcanis - Without drone assign, the slowcat doctrine will wither and die.

Cody Zamorah
Doomheim
#40 - 2012-06-01 22:17:43 UTC  |  Edited by: Cody Zamorah
Grath Telkin wrote:

If you were going to rob a bank, got the guns, got the get away car, got IN the car and started the engine, would you expect the police to tell you that what you're doing is wrong before you left??

Can you apply your logic to ANY OTHER SPORTING EVENT OR SCENARIO LIKE THAT AT ALL and expect the officials to go out of their way to tell you that something you're doing thats blatantly against the rules is against the rules?

They should have simply known that CCP were mad at them (everybody knew CCP was mad at them) and carried the burden of playing it safe on their own.

I cannot fathom how you expect somebody to hand hold them and make sure they don't break rules that were obviously created specifically because of what they did, they're grown ass men, they're responsible for their own actions.



Ah yes, the real and absurd real life analogies which are normally not to be drawn into EVE are spouted up to state a case which isn't there.

Let's find some real life analogies out of sports then.
I take it you are familiar with soccer. A sport well known in Europe.
Soon there will be European Championships. And there are actually countries which train versus soccerteams from other countries.
I am not talking about Italy training versus Greece, but more like for example Netherlands training versus Bayern Munchen.

Now for Bayern Munchen they also have players in the field which are also part of the dutch national team.
If a player or player plays then, is he colluding? Because he knows both teams very well and has certain feelings for both teams.
One provides his income and the other provides him with national glory.
So for arguements sake in your world we best remove a player in such a situation completely since there MIGHT be a chance of collusion.

And even if they knew and were fully aware CCP were mad at them, shouldn't they still be expecting similar treatment as people who CCP weren't mad at?
Doesn't that prove the point actually that the bar which people have to pass get's adjusted by the mere feelings CCP has to a certain entity or individual?
This would set a dangerous prescedence since biased ruling always has a startingpoint.

CCP also is build out of grown ass men and women, aren't they resonsible for their actions and inactions in the same way too then?
Previous page123Next page