Assembly Hall

LMFAO Please! Drake provide intelligent reasoning. Pigs will fly, Hell will freeze, The Pope will renounce religion and become the worlds leading biology scientist bringing new and great advances in the theory of evolution... Anything else and everything else WILL happen before this guy gets some intelligence and can actually give good logical constructive reason to his views. I mean just check a few of the other hot threads atm and you will realize this.

Now as to your idea, will this not in fact just further encourage ganking? Rich players with money to throw away not even having to worry about concord if they Jam a defenseless ship. I really don't think it will help us miners much, only be exploited by those we already have problems with. I can see it would allow miners to jam military ships in the hope they can get their hard earned haul out before they are Locked, Scrammed and Popped. But i really don't feel it would end up working out like that.

I would be more than happy to introduce to you why this is bad...except youd post a wall of text crying over why I stole your salvage....blew up your multi-billion ISK mission ship...and left laughing with your stuff.

So no..not going there.

Go mission in any market hubs and be paitent and you'll see why my little nooblet.

*facepalm*

I suspect your just bitter over 1 too many encounters with a Falcon.

Classic ECM whine post.

I've got to agree with Koreli, here. I think this would be slanted too far in favor of griefers and gankers. You'd have to charge a high fee to make it a worthwhile ISK sink and if it costs more than miner earns in an hour or so then it's too expensive to be worth it for the miner, but still an easy expense for a ganker.

Aegis destroyers on the other hand...: see sig.

Note to self - Danika is ebil.

Oops, sorry, you're quite correct. My mistake.

Perhaps the license should exclude deadspace?

Alright you misguided, inbred, self-absorbed, piece of walking human fecal excrement, let's break this down in simple words that you can wrap your tiny intellect around. I'm sure you don't have two misfiring synapses to rub together to jumpstart even the beginnings of a thought pattern without starting a fire in the big empty skull of yours.

A "license to jam" in high sec would spell disasterous results for already easily exploited mechanics. Let's break out an example, shall we?

Corp A wardecs Corp B. Corp B brings all of their friends in Falcons with their jamming licenses. Suddenly Corp A can not do ****, even with aggression from being jammed, and suddenly, there goes the fleet. It will be like neutral RR all over again, which created nothing but ***pain.

Furthermore, your weak argument of "they'll have aggression on the jammer." Are you ****ing serious? So let's say we get multiple ships that get jamming licences, and decide to all go jam the same target at the same time. Tell me, how are they able to aggress?

Chances are, they won't be able to.

But I wouldn't expect you, the child that should have been the load blasted on the wall after a quick pull out to understand that.

Furthermore, who's going to take a noob NPC alt seriously? Stick around for a while and stop ****posting, or even better, just stop posting altogether, and biomass, because honestly, we'd hate for your blatant stupidity to rub off on any of the rookies that are actually worth something.

Five weeks in the hole changes a man.

In all seriousness, ****ing NCO training.

And usually there was something rational in my paragraphs loaded with belligerence and hatred. But I think it's because I actually have the proper balance of nicotine and caffeine in my system for once.

To answer your question, absolutely nothing.

However, it would turn into neutral ECM-a-thon instead of neutral RR-a-thon.

So either way, it is a stupid ****ing idea.

This just needs to be locked until someone can come up with something actually worth a damn.