These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

Save the Navitas
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Oregin
Phoenix Naval Operations
Phoenix Naval Systems
#21 - 2012-05-28 21:25:50 UTC
I agree, imicus model is totally awful.

Then again, I don't think I'll ever adjust to flying a Navitas...that ship has far too many negative connotations being associated with mining and all... :p
Barbara Nichole
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#22 - 2012-05-28 22:04:29 UTC
Though my husband disagrees, the Amarr ships are all uniformly beautiful. You could train those instead. P

  - remove the cloaked from local; free intel is the real problem, not  "afk" cloaking -

[IMG]http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a208/DawnFrostbringer/consultsig.jpg[/IMG]
Azaraius
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#23 - 2012-05-29 07:24:07 UTC
Awesome guys, Love seeing those comments and ideas. Keep'em coming.
briannt
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#24 - 2012-05-29 08:57:35 UTC
i think its a great idea and hope ccp does to
Kaelie Onren
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#25 - 2012-05-29 11:49:16 UTC
You think that's ugly? Let's talk Kitsune!
But yeah imicus looks like somebody screwed up the blueprint or ran out of materials halfway through construction.
Azaraius
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#26 - 2012-05-30 08:58:47 UTC
Kaelie Onren wrote:
You think that's ugly? Let's talk Kitsune!
But yeah imicus looks like somebody screwed up the blueprint or ran out of materials halfway through construction.


You are forgetting the Caldari Dont care how ships look so long as they work ... This is not the case with the Gallente, beauty is thought up WITH the design.
Kaelie Onren
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#27 - 2012-06-06 14:37:27 UTC
Azaraius wrote:
Kaelie Onren wrote:
You think that's ugly? Let's talk Kitsune!
But yeah imicus looks like somebody screwed up the blueprint or ran out of materials halfway through construction.


You are forgetting the Caldari Dont care how ships look so long as they work ... This is not the case with the Gallente, beauty is thought up WITH the design.

You are right, I totally forgot that! :-P Wait, you sure you didn't mean Minmatar? Anyway, if you really want to play the 'function' card, then I would really like to hear the explanation of the function of the goose head on the Moa, the dangle head of the Griffin, or how 'functional' is having a lobsided non-symmetrical hull design to start with.

Maybe you just don't appreciate the banana and kickstand awesomeness. I mean, you probably also think that Rothko is just a bunch of coloured squares. :P

At any rate, although they may change the banana model, they won't swap them as you suggested, would cause too much confusion.
Reaver Glitterstim
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#28 - 2012-06-06 15:03:18 UTC
I'm a little sad that CCP is turning the mining frigates into combat frigates.

Maybe the scan probe and mining frigates could be made into one, with 3 high slots and 2 turret hardpoints. Noobs want their carebearing ship.

FT Diomedes: "Reaver, sometimes I wonder what you are thinking when you sit down to post."

Frostys Virpio: "We have to give it to him that he does put more effort than the vast majority in his idea but damn does it sometime come out of nowhere."
Previous page12