These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

CSM 7 Sugestion De-Cloaking

Author
Robert Caldera
Caldera Trading and Investment
#21 - 2012-05-21 10:36:32 UTC
Codie Black wrote:

and the afk cloaking problem solve


which problem? There is none.
Mike Whiite
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#22 - 2012-05-21 10:48:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Mike Whiite
Codie Black wrote:
just been runnign a background check on you all, all of you stay in highsec.
and dont have that problem, so that's easy to say, there is no problem,
come to 0,0 that's where the problem is, not in highsec.



You know you're absolutly right, if someone cloacks up in highsec and "leaves his PC" (you have actualy no way of knowing that.)

Every one will go on with what they are doing.

You know why because you don't need a cloak to sneak up on people, there is hardly a way to know if someone is up to no good in, highsec or in low sec for that matter.

So the fact that you are able to have more intel on someone than in High or low sec is your Problem??????

tyhat could easly be solved, remove aliance icons, and you have the same intel as highsec, problem solved right :)
Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
#23 - 2012-05-21 11:27:08 UTC
Mike Whiite wrote:
Codie Black wrote:
just been runnign a background check on you all, all of you stay in highsec.
and dont have that problem, so that's easy to say, there is no problem,
come to 0,0 that's where the problem is, not in highsec.



You know you're absolutly right, if someone cloacks up in highsec and "leaves his PC" (you have actualy no way of knowing that.)

Every one will go on with what they are doing.

You know why because you don't need a cloak to sneak up on people, there is hardly a way to know if someone is up to no good in, highsec or in low sec for that matter.

So the fact that you are able to have more intel on someone in High or low sec is your Problem??????

tyhat could easly be solved, remove aliance icons, and you have the same intel as highsec, problem solved right :)

AHAHAHAHA.

Yeah, the first guy who posted from negative ten is a real high sec bear.

[center]"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"  -MXZF[/center]

Tchulen
Trumpets and Bookmarks
#24 - 2012-05-21 11:45:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Tchulen
[facepalm]

How many times do people need it explaining to them that AFK cloaking isn't a problem, their fear is the problem.

Just to recap:

1) People who are AFK aren't a danger to anyone and so not a problem

2) People who are cloaked up in sytem and not AFK are playing the game and so not a problem

3) People who are afraid of people who aren't blue to them in their system and have absolutely no intention of doing anything about it or covering their arses or getting help from their corp/alliance are a problem

Any alteration to cloaks will affect WH dwellers immensely in order to benefit only those who have no imagination and allow themselves to be controlled by fear.

The solutions to cloakers in your system have been explained in this thread and many many other threads. If those who have a problem with cloakers aren't prepared to do anything about it by utilising one or more of the multitude of possible counters why should the game be changed? Why should people using the cloaking mechanics as they're intended to be used be penalised because a small minority can't defend themselves and cry about it on the forums?

It's a bit like saying mining ships should be made invincible in high sec because otherwise miners can't mine. How many of you would agree to that?
Meditril
Hoplite Brigade
Ushra'Khan
#25 - 2012-05-21 12:57:37 UTC
I have a very dramatic issue to be solved: AFK Docking!
Everytime I am flying though low-sec on the hunt for Amarr to kill you notice that many of them are AFK docked at a station. This is totally unfair! Please find a mechanism against AFK docking, for example my adding a random chance of 1% per minute then someone is forced to undock.

### joke off ###

Cloaking is fine as it is, just adapt and go away.
Herold Oldtimer
State War Academy
Caldari State
#26 - 2012-05-21 13:29:48 UTC
afk players should get timed out from local
Tchulen
Trumpets and Bookmarks
#27 - 2012-05-21 13:45:18 UTC
Herold Oldtimer wrote:
afk players should get timed out from local


So when you have a person who is intentionally camping an ore belt in someone else's alliance space in a cloaked ship all they have to do is wait and they'll not only be cloaked but they'll also appear to have left the system making all the miners come out again and DIAF.

Whilst I don't think cloaking is over powered what you're suggesting would get abused so very much. It really wouldn't help the situation at all.

FloppieTheBanjoClown
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
#28 - 2012-05-21 14:19:21 UTC
I don't understand why people don't grasp the uses for cloaking devices. It's like they can't see past the "cloak for days then cyno a fleet in" play that goes on in nullsec.

I scout targets, set up warp-ins, ambush people, gather intel on POS activities and other such things. All of those require cloaking that is reliable; a cloak failing on-grid with an enemy fleet is a recipe for doom. You might as well remove it from the game.

Founding member of the Belligerent Undesirables movement.

Tchulen
Trumpets and Bookmarks
#29 - 2012-05-21 15:45:31 UTC
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:
I don't understand why people don't grasp the uses for cloaking devices. It's like they can't see past the "cloak for days then cyno a fleet in" play that goes on in nullsec.

I scout targets, set up warp-ins, ambush people, gather intel on POS activities and other such things. All of those require cloaking that is reliable; a cloak failing on-grid with an enemy fleet is a recipe for doom. You might as well remove it from the game.


It's because most people can't see things from any perspective other than their own. Because they're having a hard time because of someone using a cloak they think they're justified in demanding a nerf to cloaking that ruins large swathes of the game.

It's basically ignorance coupled with selfishness.
Herold Oldtimer
State War Academy
Caldari State
#30 - 2012-05-21 16:11:12 UTC
Tchulen wrote:
Herold Oldtimer wrote:
afk players should get timed out from local


So when you have a person who is intentionally camping an ore belt in someone else's alliance space in a cloaked ship all they have to do is wait and they'll not only be cloaked but they'll also appear to have left the system making all the miners come out again and DIAF.

Whilst I don't think cloaking is over powered what you're suggesting would get abused so very much. It really wouldn't help the situation at all.



No game should reward a player for being inactive. So if an inactive enemy player is removed from the list of active players then the "fear" of having that enemy player in the same system as you is diminished.

Also, nothing in null-sec should be done alone. So it should also be natural for corps living in null to provide adequate protection and/or scouting to said miners.

I doubt something like this will completely eradicate static gameplay. (EVE players will be EVE players). But it could get more players out of stations/pos's. Added with some way to hunt non-cov-ops cloaked ships, and EVE null-sec could get very exciting.
Jack Carrigan
Order of the Shadow
#31 - 2012-05-21 17:48:59 UTC
Codie Black wrote:
just been runnign a background check on you all, all of you stay in highsec.
and dont have that problem, so that's easy to say, there is no problem,
come to 0,0 that's where the problem is, not in highsec.


You are just as stupid as I suspected you were. If you think I stay in high sec, you are not only stupid, but naive.

I frequent low sec systems, and when the pay is right, null sec, and yes, I fly a cloaked ship on a regular basis, but the difference is, I'm not an AFK cloaker.

As for cloaking, it is working as intended as there are means of countering it, therefore it is a balanced mechanic.

Counters to cloaking:
- A Standing Fleet
- Drag Bubbles and drone boats in the center of them with drones deployed
- Situational awareness (which of these is probably the biggest of them)

Quit trying to PvE in other people's systems, quit trying to support your topic by spewing worthless facts that you pulled out of your ***, quit ****posting, give me your stuff, and biomass.

I am the One who exists in Shadow. I am the Devil your parents warned you about.

||CEO: Order of the Shadow||Executor: The Revenant Order||Creator: Bowhead||

Kyshonuba
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#32 - 2012-05-21 20:37:36 UTC  |  Edited by: Kyshonuba
In PvP Games "Sniper_Fighting styles" always cause heated debattes on weather they are legit or not.

A lot of eve players are americans, so you might remember the heated debattes in quake about snipers ..... players chose a dark "sniper-corner" for their avatars and stayed hidden (cloaked) for most of the time, until some other player came along.
Well, emotions went that high, that suggestions came up like " Everybody who stands still and doesnt move for longer then an hour has to autoexplode " ..... hilarious Lol
Those events took place in the year of 1997/1998. Its an age-old PvP problem and nobody should hope for a perfect solution.

By the way the CSM touched that problem at 1h.50min town meeting 19.05 on eve radio.
CSM meeting 19.05
Jack Carrigan
Order of the Shadow
#33 - 2012-05-21 20:53:21 UTC
Seriously, I think this thread should be locked for lack of content or intelligence on the part of the OP.

Either that, or an all out trolling/flaming war is probably going to start.

I am the One who exists in Shadow. I am the Devil your parents warned you about.

||CEO: Order of the Shadow||Executor: The Revenant Order||Creator: Bowhead||

Stigman Zuwadza
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#34 - 2012-05-21 23:38:05 UTC
.

It's broken and it's been broken for a long time and it'll be broken for some time to come.

Kyshonuba
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#35 - 2012-05-22 01:59:36 UTC  |  Edited by: Kyshonuba
Stigman Zuwadza wrote:

CSM Summit Dec 2011 - Minutes (see page 22)


PAGE 22

"Cloak Hunters: CCP brought up the possibility of a future cloak-hunting ship or mechanic as a hypothetical; this was described as ‘more like finding a submarine than pulling a blanket off’ a cloaked ship. The CSM was cautiously positive about the idea of a cloak-hunting vessel of some kind."


.... interesting. But although CCP is redefining the roles of of some lesser used ships atm i never heard of such ships in that context. A consequence of the technical problems, described in CSM townhall meeting 19.5 ?
Celeste Benal
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#36 - 2012-05-22 03:49:03 UTC
Not supported.

Imagine a cloaked bomber fleet waiting to drop bombs on an enemy fleet; a legitimate tactic and certainly not AFK. Suddenly player 33 in fleet gets hit by the RNG decloak. Every bomber within 2000m of this one decloaks, and then every bomber with 2000m of those bombers decloaks until, in a beautiful cascade of decloaking, every bomber in the fleet is visible.

Also, every afk cloaker gets the same once per 24 hour decloak that you get. Its called down time.

Yeah. No.
Stigman Zuwadza
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#37 - 2012-05-22 03:55:07 UTC
Kyshonuba wrote:
...the technical problems, described in CSM townhall meeting 19.5 ?


Just finished listening to it, well worth the listen.

Was actually good to hear about this aspect and it made me chuckle a little that the panel was split on the whole matter, as is the community it seems. Big smile

Fly safe. o7

It's broken and it's been broken for a long time and it'll be broken for some time to come.

Stralow
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#38 - 2012-05-22 10:10:57 UTC
Simi Kusoni wrote:

And btw, my first post was not directed at you, it was directed at the OP. Just in case you misunderstood, your English is perfectly legible.


Ah okay. Than I'm sorry. I was confused because of your two replies and i was quoted in one of them Blink

i say we take off and nuke the whole site from orbit. it's the only way to be sure

Kyshonuba
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#39 - 2012-05-22 16:26:32 UTC  |  Edited by: Kyshonuba
Celeste Benal wrote:
Not supported.

Imagine a cloaked bomber fleet waiting to drop bombs on an enemy fleet; a legitimate tactic and certainly not AFK. Suddenly player 33 in fleet gets hit by the RNG decloak. Every bomber within 2000m of this one decloaks, and then every bomber with 2000m of those bombers decloaks until, in a beautiful cascade of decloaking, every bomber in the fleet is visible.

Also, every afk cloaker gets the same once per 24 hour decloak that you get. Its called down time.

Yeah. No.



1.Will a possible decloaking-mechanism work that fast, that a stealth-bomber fleet in waiting position will get in danger of being exposed in 5 minutes ?..... possible bad

2.Will a possible decloaking-mechanism work that fast, that a stealth-bomber fleet in waiting position will get in danger of being exposed in 20 minutes ?..... possible not so bad (because the FC isnt working as intended Roll)
Quade Warren
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#40 - 2012-05-22 18:25:53 UTC
Simi Kusoni wrote:
Stralow wrote:
As a WH resident i'd say no

These kind of cloaking threads are all kind of awful... everytime... there is nothing broken.

This is off topic, but seeing as this topic isn't going anywhere im going to post anyway, do you know what I found out the other day?

Bots can see local in wormholes. Apparently local isn't really "removed" in wormholes, the local list is still sent to the client its just hidden in the GUI. Now THAT is something that needs fixing.



You're kiddin' me, right? I sincerely hope CCP didn't give the client the choice of what the player can see or can't see when it comes to the GUI in wormhole space. If this is true, you are damned right it needs fixing.
Previous page12