EVE General Discussion

i m not rich, but a halo set nowadays is relatively common, specially for flying T3 ships and tech 2 cruisers. i might be wrong but i believe they are used also in carriers. plus we have the low level grade halo implants. which are pretty cheap.

Missiles are like trying to hit a bullet with a smaller bullet whilst wearing a blindfold, riding a horse.

The most probable explanation to making tracking weapon disruption affect missile ships would be to make those EWAR modules nerf the explosion radius on guided and the explosion velocity on unguided missiles, perhaps pen them into more gun-like categories to some extent. (I don't entirely understand exactly how I come to this, I just know that I do and that it makes sense in some subconscious manner.)

Basically, I think they'd nerf one particular to-hit(to-damage) property of the missile for each missile type.

You can nerf them all you want to, when the new graphics come out I will be flying the biggest baddest missile boat with max slots, and even the mid and low slots will have launchers in them. And no, I will not group them and yes, I am going to cause your client to crash, that is the true power of missile spam.

Actually, I kinda have problem with that. You see, instead CCP making smartbombs and defenders to work against missiles, where latter is MEANT TO WORK as direct counter, they go and slap additional role to another e-war system. But investing on TQ hardware to make missile fights viable where both missiles and defenders are calced might have been too big investment. Instead slap much more server friendly way to handle it so we dont need to spend time and effort upgrading them.

Fair is fair, now is good time to ask insta hit missiles because CCP clearly is in favor of that, after all turret like calcs are much less tiring for server.

Dont bring NPC rat related issues here, the npc's still use old, as in 2005 old e-war mechanics. Their various e-wars are % based and so are their defenders, they dont have defender modules and missiles like pilots have. Same for repair etc changes. If you change medium armor repper to rep +5000% hp per cycle, it doesnt mean all cruiser and bc cruiser rats have tank out of wazoo. Their tank stays the same, due to nature they're coded.

So yeah, Tengu gropers would be unaffected unless they shot at players fitting defenders.

no u should not, it will be a waste of sp

they say it is that missles don't hit there target the explode before impact henc just pushing the traget away rather than do any real damage

a frig orbits at 500 ms at 10K away a raven with max torp skills can shoot at that frig all day and his shield regen will tank it


a rail boat will all most do the same exepet i diff if they do a Crit hit the frig will insta pop lol missles will never do that they way they are and now they are even doing to be less of threat to even bigger targets.

Here's even more interesting question, how many people fit covop bridges to their ships. Just because the answer is "few" doesnt mean covop bridges should be changed to suddenly allow bridging different ship types without proper weighting of the good and bad sides it will cause to gameplay.

Same is here, sure, very few fit tracking disrupts atm, those who do mainly fit it for 1vs1 "honor" pvp. However, after the change said honor pvp fits with dual prop will be even more powerful against missile boats, their only true counter thus far.

So instead of fixing defenders CCP is doing what exactly ?????