These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

Consensual pvp arenas bringing low sec back to life

Author
Shubs
V0LTA
WE FORM V0LTA
#1 - 2012-05-18 10:22:12 UTC
While this would be a buttload of coding for ccp it could be an epic expansion


The concept of 2v2 4v4 6v6 arenas in low sec.

.Brings low sec back to life
.Frig, Cruiser, BC & BS +t2 varients
1falcon & 1logistics max in 4v4 and 6v6 none in 2v2 or remove conpletely

How will this work?
you dock at said low sec station,
Ammamake, aunenen, Obe, Assah, mirotim, maut w/e

Arena agents will be under agents tab like missions
you can then choose levels 1,2,3 etc which will correspond
to ship types, so frigs, cruiser, bc etc...

Agent will ask if you wish to take your fleet or you can leave
fleet and join a pubbie, you will be in a waiting session until 2 4 or 6 parties
are ready, you will then session change too a arena, 150km square,
if you burn outside this you will get a destruction warning,this will be on a
completley seperate instance so you cant be probed out, once the fight is over
you will be transfered back to station!


You can also enter tournaments and ccp could implement leaderboards
corp and alliance


Well hows that gonna bring pvp to low sec?
People have to move thier not everyone has alt caps,
stations will get camped too


Wait... what stops awoxing alts?
If shot by a char on your team they recieve a standing
hit to the agent and after doing this a few times they can no longer enter

Is this is going to cost me alot of isk if i die!?
. Insurance

Most importantly whats the reward?? im in this for isk!
. each respective level of battle you win gives you X ammount of victory points
which is shared around your fleet or team.

These victory points can be either sold on the market or used in the arena
loyalty point store which will have unique items such as;

Apparel: Medals
Titles & decorations
Special drugs for arena use only
unique ship skins applied to ships like rigs
Concord LP exchange

Can be sold back to the agent at a npc buy order price

And ofc a killmail'

what do you think?

Sorry for layout on phone!
Robert Caldera
Caldera Trading and Investment
#2 - 2012-05-18 10:24:41 UTC
sh*tty idea.

consensual pvp is too un-eve.

better idea:
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=110149&find=unread
Schmata Bastanold
In Boobiez We Trust
#3 - 2012-05-18 10:33:18 UTC
First go to Amamake and see for yourself how dead pvp is in there and how much of your help it needs to get back to life. Best point of view you will get going through Osso gate.

Invalid signature format

Shubs
V0LTA
WE FORM V0LTA
#4 - 2012-05-18 10:33:36 UTC
To un eve, eve is pretty dead in terms of pvp, roaming isnt what it use to be no one fights, this would be for people who actually want to fight without using a falcon alt or blobbing or want time out from 0.0 politics, and would actually be quite fun like mini alliance tournament you saying that the AT is ****** and boring far from it...
Shubs
V0LTA
WE FORM V0LTA
#5 - 2012-05-18 10:35:36 UTC
Schmata Bastanold wrote:
First go to Amamake and see for yourself how dead pvp is in there and how much of your help it needs to get back to life. Best point of view you will get going through Osso gate.


Before trying to be smart check my alliance ticker, i kinda live there, secondly blowing up frigates and noob ships 23/7 is hardly pvp
Schmata Bastanold
In Boobiez We Trust
#6 - 2012-05-18 10:43:48 UTC
Shubs wrote:
Schmata Bastanold wrote:
First go to Amamake and see for yourself how dead pvp is in there and how much of your help it needs to get back to life. Best point of view you will get going through Osso gate.


Before trying to be smart check my alliance ticker, i kinda live there, secondly blowing up frigates and noob ships 23/7 is hardly pvp


You are right, I posted before checking up your alliance ticker. So, you say PL needs arenas with ship size limits to help with l33t habit of killing noobs in frigs? Maybe just simply don't do it instead?

Invalid signature format

Shubs
V0LTA
WE FORM V0LTA
#7 - 2012-05-18 10:51:16 UTC  |  Edited by: Shubs
Schmata Bastanold wrote:
Shubs wrote:
Schmata Bastanold wrote:
First go to Amamake and see for yourself how dead pvp is in there and how much of your help it needs to get back to life. Best point of view you will get going through Osso gate.


Before trying to be smart check my alliance ticker, i kinda live there, secondly blowing up frigates and noob ships 23/7 is hardly pvp


You are right, I posted before checking up your alliance ticker. So, you say PL needs arenas with ship size limits to help with l33t habit of killing noobs in frigs? Maybe just simply don't do it instead?


Maybe you should take your own advice and check the ossogur gate yourself, it was heretics and scum i was refering to saying i live there doesnt mean i camp the gate... nor does PL sincewelll.....
Schmata Bastanold
In Boobiez We Trust
#8 - 2012-05-18 11:07:11 UTC
Shubs wrote:
Maybe you should take your own advice and check the ossogur gate yourself, it was heretics and scum i was refering to saying i live there doesnt mean i camp the gate... nor does PL sincewelll.....


Maybe I should, who knows where I go next time I log in.

Being far more experienced and seasoned player than me you should know that falcon faggotry would be perfectly nerfed or maybe even eliminated if boosters had to be on grid to apply their boosts. Arenas, separate instances of pvp places - that sounds quite like some other MMO, I forgot a name right now...

Invalid signature format

Vaju Enki
Secular Wisdom
#9 - 2012-05-18 11:15:42 UTC
After reading this ****, I literally had to vomit...

The Tears Must Flow

Commander Karin
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#10 - 2012-05-18 18:27:47 UTC
I totaly agree with the idea of consensual pvp. Not sure about the lowsec arena, but in EVE pvp is always a important subject, but it has a terrible pvp enviorment.


And you know, there are always people that want EVE to be the same game as it was when it was born. People, you sucks. EVE should envolve, and things like consensual PVP is all EVE need now to grow pvp specially for those who are starting the game now.


And before the haters start to hate, this idea is something that can work for duels and fair battle. Most people that says somethings about this to be un-eve is someone that fits in one of these categories:
a) You have an active corp, with member doing pvp, helping with support each other, logi and things like that, and most times you only kill noobs using an unfair advantage, like friends and logi.
b) You ate player with some time and a lot of sp, so you think all must be continue as always just to you keep being the king of the hill
c) You are a hater or a vintage person who doesn't like things to envolve.

But you guys forget that EVE is not made only about these people, like CCP showed in fanfest, its about 50-50 of people who love pvp and hate pvp. And this is due the fact that the game lacks of a fair gameplay in pvp. There are these kind of player too:
a) People who doesn't have friends to do pvp with (with is no guarantee since if you find 3 player nothing guarantee that you are going to make a 3vs3 fight)
b) People who plays from time to time and just want to fit a ship and see if it can handle other ship
c) People who doenst have time to wait until some pvp action to happen (sometimes it really sucks how much you need to wait until discover that the fight you thought was going to happen is just another unfair battle against 5 ships, with logi support, etc)

There are many other situations, but you get my point.

I really believe lowsec, nullsec and all elements that exists today in PvP should continue, but new things should exists too.

I will just give you a simple example and will use my case. Im just a miner, an industrial guy, mostly because PvP need fleets, sync with people and friends online time, and mostly time lucky. Is hard to do solo pvp and is very hard to win a fight when you are alone and against 2 or 3 ships, specially if you have a 1-2 years char. Some times I just wanna to fit a ship and fight someone, a duel, one vs one, without friends or any **** like that, but how so if EVE players are mostly not trustable.

So you will say, like I heard many times before "go to high sec and jet a can", okay if at least that guarantee any fairplay, but it wont, you jet a can and maybe you are just being a bait while you corp friends waits to arrive and do a 10vs1 fight, or maybe the other guy has a logi ship to help, etc etc.

I believe in the ideia that if a friend is being attacked you should be able to help him, like in a park fight, but a consensual fight isnt like a fight in a park, is more like a fight in an arena, a place that will guarantee the fair battle.

oh, and I almost forget to mention, but lets no forget that when you jet a can you have always the advantage of the first shoot. Well, do you really thing jetcan is the best engine to PvP?


EVE is cool, but it should have more space for those who doesn't participate of huge corps, or doesn't have friend to do PvP along.

And guys, I pay for EVE every month like many others and Im tired of everytime I try to do some pvp like a 1vs1 fight knowing that I will finish being destroyed by a gang of people. That is what keeps me out from PvP, and I'm pretty sure is the same reason others doesn't do it neither.


regards
PS: my english is terrible and I know, so **** off.
Fred Lodenstane
Lizard Ltd
#11 - 2012-05-18 19:13:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Fred Lodenstane
Isn't undocking from a station consenting to the risks of PvP in Eve? Why do we need this? If you're worried about being in unfair fights then join a PvP corp and learn how to be on the winning side of a brawl.
Linna Excel
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#12 - 2012-05-18 19:18:55 UTC
I thought FW was EVE's consensual warfare.
Kusum Fawn
Perkone
Caldari State
#13 - 2012-05-18 19:27:49 UTC
... Pl can already Roll most alliances. why not do some old CVA Prov style stuff,

Open systems to people to mine and whatnot, then sweep through occasionally and wipe out some old reds, or kill others that will invariably roam through your space.

Dont you guys still have some sway with one or more of the Guristas null space alliances? or are they all falling apart ?

Its all fine and good to have a batphone, but the frequency that you guys used it makes people not want to roam through your associated space. and killing off all the small alliances didnt help you any.

Its not possible to please all the people all the time, but it sure as hell is possible to Displease all the people, most of the time.

Commander Karin
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#14 - 2012-05-18 19:36:38 UTC  |  Edited by: Commander Karin
Fred Lodenstane wrote:
Isn't undocking from a station consenting to the risks of PvP in Eve? Why do we need this? If you're worried about being in unfair fights then join a PvP corp and learn how to be on the winning side of a brawl.


That will keep happening. But why the hell not add one more option, like the option to do a 1vs1 fight in hight sec where only those 1vs1 (or 2vs2, 3vs3 maybe it should exist only to small or solo fights) will be fighting, someone is still going to loose as usual, but is a way avoid the unfair possibility in this cases. Is the idea of multiplayer in close number.

Imagine that I have 1hour to play eve, and just want to go fit a ship and fight with other player and see who wins then go to work? Now this isnt possible, I need to fit a ship, find friends, roam, gatecamp, or jetcan, and this gives you a so many possibilities sometimes you sit waiting for hours and when you fight you are always in unfair advantage and will probalbe loose if do it solo. So in the end you don't do it, and you pass 1hour in a boring game in EVE. With that possibility would incentivating to player to do pvp, not because of the risk of loosing, must because knowing is a 1vs1 fight without the possibility of other geting into it will incentivate people to fight and test their skills.

Its something I think many peoples would enjoy and the pvp was going to growth to the roof. Not just because of these 1vs1 fights, but because player would risk more and fear less going into lowsec, etc.

ยด['s
ShahFluffers
Ice Fire Warriors
#15 - 2012-05-18 20:44:25 UTC  |  Edited by: ShahFluffers
Commander Karin wrote:
But why the hell not add one more option, like the option to do a 1vs1 fight in hight sec where only those 1vs1 (or 2vs2, 3vs3 maybe it should exist only to small or solo fights) will be fighting, someone is still going to loose as usual, but is a way avoid the unfair possibility in this cases.

Bolded the important part.

The problem with "instanced arena" systems like this is that if you take away the uncertainty, place hard limits on how many you will face and where you face them... you take away from "wild/casual PvP" (see: non-SOV PvP) from the rest of the game.

Why would this happen? Simple. If I want to PvP am I...
Option 1: ... going to roam around in low/null-sec and risk the chance that I might bump into a group that has the capability to match me and/or call in reinforcements at will (i.e. go up against complete uncertainty)?
Option 2: ... going to participate in a system where I can decide exactly how many opponents I am facing at one time without worrying about outside interference?


Yes the current system isn't fair... except for the fact that everyone can use this "unfairness" to their advantage... which is what makes it fair.
Commander Karin
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#16 - 2012-05-18 21:17:29 UTC
ShahFluffers wrote:
Commander Karin wrote:
But why the hell not add one more option, like the option to do a 1vs1 fight in hight sec where only those 1vs1 (or 2vs2, 3vs3 maybe it should exist only to small or solo fights) will be fighting, someone is still going to loose as usual, but is a way avoid the unfair possibility in this cases.

Bolded the important part.

The problem with "instanced arena" systems like this is that if you take away the uncertainty, place hard limits on how many you will face and where you face them... you take away from "wild/casual PvP" (see: non-SOV PvP) from the rest of the game.

Why would this happen? Simple. If I want to PvP am I...
Option 1: ... going to roam around in low/null-sec and risk the chance that I might bump into a group that has the capability to match me and/or call in reinforcements at will (i.e. go up against complete uncertainty)?
Option 2: ... going to participate in a system where I can decide exactly how many opponents I am facing at one time without worrying about outside interference?


Yes the current system isn't fair... except for the fact that everyone can use this "unfairness" to their advantage... which is what makes it fair.


I'm not sure if a system like that would do something harm to the overall PvP, since its limited to solo (which I sitll think makes sense, is nothing more than an evolution to the jetcan system to direct confront) still will have player going in lowsec/nullsec for the same reasons that do today, the difference was going to be in the other playing mass, that are not pvpers but would like to do 1vs1 matches time from time, just for fun, to see who win. The other hardcore players Im pretty sure was going to keep flying in lowsec with they group, etc.
Fred Lodenstane
Lizard Ltd
#17 - 2012-05-18 23:17:42 UTC
Commander Karin wrote:

I'm not sure if a system like that would do something harm to the overall PvP, since its limited to solo (which I sitll think makes sense, is nothing more than an evolution to the jetcan system to direct confront) still will have player going in lowsec/nullsec for the same reasons that do today, the difference was going to be in the other playing mass, that are not pvpers but would like to do 1vs1 matches time from time, just for fun, to see who win. The other hardcore players Im pretty sure was going to keep flying in lowsec with they group, etc.


Go onto the Singularity server then. You can have as many 1v1 fights there as you want. You already answered your question of getting 1v1 fights too by stating how people use jetcans in highsec to initiate fights without Concord interfering. Just warp to a random sun and start your fight, no one should bother you. These changes your proposing have no place in Eve and will never happen. Eve is supposed to be unfair, that's why it's fair.
Commander Karin
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#18 - 2012-05-19 04:42:00 UTC
Fred Lodenstane wrote:
Commander Karin wrote:

I'm not sure if a system like that would do something harm to the overall PvP, since its limited to solo (which I sitll think makes sense, is nothing more than an evolution to the jetcan system to direct confront) still will have player going in lowsec/nullsec for the same reasons that do today, the difference was going to be in the other playing mass, that are not pvpers but would like to do 1vs1 matches time from time, just for fun, to see who win. The other hardcore players Im pretty sure was going to keep flying in lowsec with they group, etc.


Go onto the Singularity server then. You can have as many 1v1 fights there as you want. You already answered your question of getting 1v1 fights too by stating how people use jetcans in highsec to initiate fights without Concord interfering. Just warp to a random sun and start your fight, no one should bother you. These changes your proposing have no place in Eve and will never happen. Eve is supposed to be unfair, that's why it's fair.


no. Jetcan isn't the same. The other guy can have help, you the owner of the can and your entire corp can help.

As I`m finishing writing this I may say it took me 3 hours in highsec until someone gets my can for a 1vs1 battle. You see that this screw the point where I can just come and have a nice play in 30min, a nice 1vs1 battle againt a real person, and not just doing some dummy mission to pass the time.


Okay, all you guys like to make rf comparassion with EVE, so what about that, in rl if you wanna fight you still can without breaking the rules, and without letting others to interfere, in EVE this option doesn't exist, and looking by the game industry side, what the hell, its suppose to be a mmorpg, they are all the time filling our balls with the PvP talk, with the "we need more player mimimi" and nothing is really being done to make PvP more attractive, so I think arena style battle are all justified.

The test servers are great, but Im not talking about 100ISK items, Im not even talking about risk. Im talking about a little way to have some fairplay, some place where people may gather to fight direct battles. Outside this place, outside this little place the rest is the same, and player still can wardec, still can roam, gatecamp, fleet battle, gank, etc. Its not a constraint but a way to engage people in battle, without the need of having a lot of logistics schematics, or syncing game play with friends and not having the need of waiting to get lucky until the time to go arrive.


Highsec canflip is something very frustrating, so stop trying to make this a very solid thing because it is not, wherever you like or not, if someone want to do a match in 30 minutes against another player ship, going into lowsec isn't the same, and if you even try to do that and find a good and fair fight in 30 minutes in low sec or you will go to bed without fighting or you will 99,99% of the time getting ganked. That is how things work in EVE and I`m pretty sure I'm not the only one who desire to have more pvp but with more rules implied.

Using jetcan to make highsec battle is like a workaround, a can is made to place things inside, I don't want to be a criminal to be able to duel with someone, that is just dumb.

You all look a bounch of religious guy that everytime someone says something about PvP in EVE you guys have the same excuse "in EVE is this way, and should stay this way forever because god want this way" or even worse "so go play other game, get out of EVE, my precious". But sorry, you guys may want this way, but CCP is trying to encourage new comers, and this Im pretty sure could fuel this up.




']'s
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#19 - 2012-05-19 05:35:17 UTC  |  Edited by: James Amril-Kesh
I believe in consensual pvp.

You create a character, you consent.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Schmata Bastanold
In Boobiez We Trust
#20 - 2012-05-19 07:23:09 UTC  |  Edited by: Schmata Bastanold
Commander Karin wrote:

no. Jetcan isn't the same. The other guy can have help, you the owner of the can and your entire corp can help.


That's beauty of Eve pvp - you never know what you are up against.

Commander Karin wrote:

As I`m finishing writing this I may say it took me 3 hours in highsec until someone gets my can for a 1vs1 battle. You see that this screw the point where I can just come and have a nice play in 30min, a nice 1vs1 battle againt a real person, and not just doing some dummy mission to pass the time.


So do sth yourself, organize in-corp duel, ask neighboring corps for series of 1v1 deathmatch or 3v3 or whatever. Eve is suppose to be player driven so drive baby, drive!

Commander Karin wrote:

You all look a bounch of religious guy that everytime someone says something about PvP in EVE you guys have the same excuse "in EVE is this way, and should stay this way forever because god want this way" or even worse "so go play other game, get out of EVE, my precious". But sorry, you guys may want this way, but CCP is trying to encourage new comers, and this Im pretty sure could fuel this up.


Eve is different and that's why for many ppl it is the only game they play. They just have everything they want in that one game. Not everything is perfect but still, it's better than anything else can offer. You want arenas you know where to go - basically anywhere outside of Eve.

Invalid signature format

12Next page