Crime & Punishment

Proof that you are "WORSER"

So much butthurt in this forum topic.

E-peens are getting a reeeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaal sense of loving in this topic.....But we're terribadlygoodycrap so we can't talk :(

To be honest when people say the fight outnumbered all the time makes me think they not good at planning there fights.To me good pirates are pirates who are effective at what they do with minimal losses.And as far as the best go,s the only pirates that i think are any is good is the ROOS from placid good and effective

Didnt care enough to read all posts.
But without a doubt, best lowsec alliance is: Raiden.

So that's where Raiden. went.

Best highsec maybe, but then again who gives a **** about that. When it comes to lowsec though, R&K would push your **** in.

liked the sarcasm

It's gone the way of IT Alliance~

1) I swear, pirate and griefer are two of the most misused and subjective words nowadays.

2) Lol at people that use KB stats to brag. Take that Jerry Rin crap somewhere else. The only thing KB stats can meaningfully prove is that you're a bad pilot, not that you're a good one.

3) I love all the people in this thread trying to compare apples to bananas to hamburgers and trying to define what makes you good at pirating. In the end, the only thing that matters is that you have fun while you're making pixels explode. There are different ways of making ships explode, gate camping, titan bridging, blobbing, killing mission runners, small gangery, 1v1s. Whatever your preferred modus operandi is, the key thing is that you're good at it and trying to create some sort of universal skill level metric just shows that you're ignorant.

Its easy to look at someone elses playstyle and criticize it for requiring no skill, when the reality is that oftentimes the reason it looks so easy is because they've refined their techniques and required skillsets to the point that it appears that way. While certain play styles might not by definition be "hard" there is still a noticeable gap between groups that can do things well and groups that try.

For example, some of the best small gang pilots are some of the worst gate gampers and visa versa. The common counter argument is that each side looks down on the others as not a valid style of play so they have no reason to be good at it, which is really just a cheap cop out. Some groups go for volume, some groups go for kill quality, and other groups go for "gudfights". The only thing that matters is being the best at whatever you choose to do while having fun and comparing yourself to another play style just shows that you're insecure about your own.