These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Test Server Feedback

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123Next page
 

Mass-test feedback - October 1

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Alex Sinai
Doomheim
#21 - 2011-10-01 18:23:32 UTC
Machine Info and Settings


OS version: W7 64-bit English
CPU: 3.0 GHz Dual Core
GPU:Nvidia GTS250
RAM:1.5GB
One client
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High


User Experience


Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out:1-5 in fleet 30-50 general flight
Average FPS - Zoomed in:3-14 in fleet 30-50 general flight
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome): 1 in fleet fight and 10 in general Singularity flight
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? Yes, a lot when node crashed.
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: I like this patch a lot and hope to see its bug free version on Tranquility soon.

Don't let them fly safe!
Sgt Maru
Perkone
Caldari State
#22 - 2011-10-01 18:25:16 UTC
Machine Info and Settings

OS version: Win7 (64bit)
CPU: Phenom x4 3.4GHz
GPU: HD6870 1GB
RAM: 8GB
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High (Maxed)


User Experience

Average FPS during fight at the gate in FD-, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: ~20 fps
Average FPS - Zoomed in: ~15 fps
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ?
I'll just say 10
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes?
Node kept crashing cause people can't read.
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: I don't know what all was tested besides the Ti-Di and server strength, but from what I saw....it was beautiful, especially the Ti-Di. Slow down, stop, speed up, all ran smooth and was pretty psychedelic. Drones didn't seem very responsive, but it may have just been me.
Celas Tial
Defenders of Souls
#23 - 2011-10-01 18:28:51 UTC
Machine Info and Settings

  • OS version: Windows 7 64-bit
  • CPU: core i7 q720
  • GPU: GeForce 310m
  • RAM: 8GB
  • Were you running more than one EVE client? No
  • Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): low

User Experience

  • Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 20-30
  • Average FPS - Zoomed in: 10
  • On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 4
  • Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? 3 before the test, and 1 just as the test was starting, shortly after we were given the order to align to planet 7.
  • Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Minus the crashes, the test was smooth. Saw numerous complaints about guns not cycling properly in chat. I didn't have that problem. Shield, Armor, and Structure gauges were bugged at about 2/3. Capacitor gauge was bugged sitting full. Bugged gauges reported (ID:116969).


Arnesa
Adelite Group
#24 - 2011-10-01 18:31:43 UTC
Machine Info and Settings

• OS version: Windows 7 64 bit
• CPU: Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 @ 2.40 GHz
• GPU: ATI Radeon HD 4350 1GB DDR2 RAM
• RAM: 8 GB
• Were you running more than one EVE client? How many? 1
• Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): Medium

User Experience

• Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: Around 60
• Average FPS - Zoomed in: Around 50
• On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 8
• Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? None, part from the system crash of FD-MLJ
• Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Part from a slow start for the modules to activate it was a good fight.
With a Window Size (Window Mode) of 1280x799 for the game the status text like "Heavy Pulse Laser II belonging to PlayerX heavily hits you, inflicting # damage." hides some of the text from your targets.
Got a few "Message not found" errors after one of my targets died msg was:
"Message: 'TargetNoLongerPresentGeneric'
Args: ['moduleID': 203]"
Draconian Arcane
Band of Super Snowflakes
#25 - 2011-10-01 18:35:29 UTC
Machine Info and Settings

• OS version: Windows Vista 32bit
• CPU: AMD Phenom II X4 975
• GPU: Radeon HD 6950
• RAM: Kingston HyperX 8Gb DDR3 1333Mhz
• Were you running more than one EVE client? NO
• Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): HIGH

User Experience

• Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out:37
• Average FPS - Zoomed in: 16
• On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? 7
• Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? Yes, many disconnects and about 2 total crashes
• Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Fielded a dread for the test, found that the guns need to be continuously activated. Guns would fire one cycle then stop firing, plus there was no indicator on the tgt or on the guns that they were active. Drones randomly engaged targets, noticed they preferred shooting inactive/abandoned drones lol "OBEY ME DRONES!!!"....
Merende Macaco
Tranquility Tavern
Pandemic Horde
#26 - 2011-10-01 18:41:27 UTC
Machine Info and Settings

  • OS version: Slackware Linux 13.37, wine 1.3.29 simulating Windows XP (32 bit)
  • CPU: Core2Duo e6750
  • GPU: Nvidia GTX 260, 896 mb
  • RAM:2 gb
  • Were you running more than one EVE client? No
  • Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): med -high (shadows + antialias off)

User Experience

  • Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 40 +/20 (framerates were jumpy)
  • Average FPS - Zoomed in: 20 +/- 5
  • On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 7 - seemed better but not extremely stable
  • Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? Various node crashes before and at end of test
  • Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Guns not cycling though the modules did, damage not updating on target view. MWD cap usage seemed off while kiting under dilation, but ship was controllable.

Tub Chil
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#27 - 2011-10-01 18:41:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Tub Chil
OS version: Windows 7 ultimate 32 bit
CPU: intel E7200 2.53 ghz
GPU: ati 4500
RAM: 2GB
Were you running more than one EVE client? nope, just 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): Low, 1680x1050


User Experience


Average FPS brackets disabled - Zoomed out: pretty good
Average FPS - Zoomed in: a bit laggy
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? 6
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? lol yeah, a lot
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: server was crashing way too much, slow motion was kinda cool. was getting damage notifications but target was not updating, also a VERY annoying thing, I could see guys yellowboxing me, but not red boxes. this happens on TQ as well ofc, but this one was worse I guess. some guy saw shooting me for over 2 minutes and I had to locate him with name, as he was not red boxed.
and I was getting message pop-ups when target was exploding.
Nemiron
Katsu Corporation
#28 - 2011-10-01 18:43:02 UTC
Machine Info and Settings

  • Vista Home Premium 32bit
  • CPU: AMD 7750 Dual-Core 2,7 GHz
  • GPU: ATI Radeon HD 4500
  • RAM: 4GB
  • Were you running more than one EVE client? How many? 1
  • Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): performance

User Experience

  • Average FPS during fight:
    • Brackets disabled: zoomed out: 30 - Zoomed in: 10
  • On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) -
  • Did you experience any disconnects, complete freezes or crashes? No.
  • Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Having no way to tell if turrets are active or not was annoying. TiDi was pretty cool.
Tedric
SUNDERING
Goonswarm Federation
#29 - 2011-10-01 18:52:30 UTC

  • OS version: win7 Pro 64
  • CPU: i5-2300
  • GPU: GeForce 560 Ti
  • RAM: 8Gb
  • Were you running more than one EVE client? How many? 1 x SISI full screen 1600x1200, 1 x 1024x768 tranquility
  • Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): SISI = default, Tranquility = high

    • User Experience
    [list]
  • On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome): 9
  • Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? Yes, two can't tell if it was a crash or a disconnect. i have logs of both if needed.
  • Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: awsome! two client crashes, lag was very resonable, no module issues, a suitable amount of chaos, did not have time to setup overview so i cannot answer fps answers.

    • I like the time dilation thingy-mu-bob!
    Aspherical
    Imperial Shipment
    Amarr Empire
    #30 - 2011-10-01 18:54:54 UTC
    OS version: WinXP
    CPU: Core2Duo 2.2GHz mobile
    GPU: Geforce 280M GTX
    RAM: 4GB
    Graphic low

    2 Clients running


    User Experience

    Average FPS - Zoomed out:
    Average FPS - Zoomed in:
    On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ?

    Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? YES Crash in FD- before test began,

    Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Unable to connect to server after first crash
    Ranud Sunraker
    Deutsche-Feierabend-Verbaende
    #31 - 2011-10-01 18:56:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Ranud Sunraker
    Machine Info and Settings


    OS: Windows 7 32-bit SP2
    CPU: Intel i3 @ 2.93 GHz
    GPU: ATI Radeon HD 5450
    RAM: 2GB
    Were you running more than one EVE client? How many? 1
    Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): Performance

    User Experience

    Average FPS during fight:
    Brackets disabled: zoomed out: 30 - Zoomed in: 10
    On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ?
    (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome)
    Not having experienced many big fights before, i can't really compare. Compared with undocking in Jita: 2-3
    Did you experience any disconnects, complete freezes or crashes?
    The client crashed while i tried to exit a WD-bubble in my pod to reship.

    Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:
    Except for the crashes i did not experience any further problems.
    I hope you guys get the TD-Feature working and implemented Soon™, it is pretty cool.


    P.S.: Logfiles and bug reports will be submitted.
    GeeShizzle MacCloud
    #32 - 2011-10-01 18:58:49 UTC  |  Edited by: GeeShizzle MacCloud
    Machine Info and Settings


    OS version: Win7 ultimate 64bit
    CPU: Intel Quad i7 920 @ 2,67GHz
    GPU:Geeforce Quadro FX3800
    RAM: 6GB Patriot Viper DDR3
    Were you running more than one EVE client? How many? no just the 1
    Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high with a few exceptions (low AA & disabled shadow quality)


    User Experience


    Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 50ish (brackets on 30ish)
    Average FPS - Zoomed in: 35ish (brackets on 20 - 25)
    On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 7-8
    Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? once with the mass crash when fleets were formed and sum1 pulled the plug on the system, and once after the test was over and i was in my pod still on grid.
    Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:

    was nice seeing TiDi used with a decent number of people, decided to try bombing (can almost see veritas' death stare) warping to and from grids wasnt silky smoothe but it never will be.
    I was loading grid with brackets on btw and had typically loaded within 5 to 7 seconds. modules activated almost instantly, unless under heavy TiDi, in which case the pause built in to activating any module was very apparent. (might need to address that btw! cause people could mistake that for module lag)
    checked my logs several times and despite knowing i was hitting a lot of things, they never registered on my logs except for a few select things.
    my eventual death at the hands of a mach (i think) caused a 10 or so second of what looked like a crash with my ship and screen frozen and "out of control" after then it resumed and was in my pod.

    after that when i was observing the field and the test was over for about 4 or 5 mins my client dropped entirely bt i guessed that was devs pulling the plug for the FD system.
    Drosstein Fitch
    The Scope
    Gallente Federation
    #33 - 2011-10-01 18:59:04 UTC  |  Edited by: Drosstein Fitch
    Machine Info and Settings


    * OS version: WinXP 32
    * CPU: Intel Centrino Duo T5600
    * GPU: nVidia GeForce Go 7300
    * RAM: 2 GB
    * Were you running more than one EVE client? How many? No
    * Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): low


    User Experience


    * Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 11.9
    * Average FPS - Zoomed in: 7.9
    * On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 8
    * Did you experience any disconnects or crashes?During test 2 crashes 1 lost connection. Had been experiencing random crashes prior to test whilst prepping ships etc.
    * Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Aligning and warping were smooth. Time dilation at the POS tower shoot looked quite cool could not see projectles though. PVP element was a better experience than previous test., although I did not see the time dilation monitor/indicator. I was able to engage and direct drones to targets, use the fleet window for rep requests ( Thank you to all those who obliged) and lasted much longer (time dilation?) than the last test. Could not auto repeat on guns and cap booster, and was difficult to tell if the modules were active or not. Unstable Power Fluctator and Invuln Fields had their green/red outlines displayed when toggled on/off. Ammunition is lost from weapons when relogging after a crash.

    Other issues encountered were strange UI behaviour, windows randomly resizing and grouping. There were no numerical values displayed for angular velocity on the overview (new font problem?) just a text string "[{Numerical Value}]".

    Oh and the new font is a little large on the overview etc, it would be great if i could be rescaled as for the menus.
    BeanBagKing
    The Order of Atlas
    #34 - 2011-10-01 18:59:04 UTC
    I wasn't able to make it unfortunately, but I had a corp mate who told me about the new Time Dilation stuff. It sounds promising. He did tell me that the camera panning slows down, as does the overview (and all menus?). I assume because it's slowing down the entire physics engine (from my understanding) that these MUST be slowed down as well? If I have this wrong, then would it be possible to separate at least those two? So we can still look around and see whats going on at a normal rate? Hopefully I'll be able to make it to the next test.

    As for the other features

    New Font - Looks a little big, I can't tell if there actually has been a size increase, or if it's just new and I'm not used to it. Still, this rocks, I love it, I can actually tell the difference between characters now!

    New CQ - Love the gallente the most, caldari a close second, good work.

    New Cyno - *cry* didn't get to see it, servers are down now, I'll try to update later.

    Last but not least, HANGER VIEW - I love you again CCP, I know we've been through some hard times, but I think seeing that counselor together really paid off. It helps that you aren't doing drugs anymore, and I really thing we have a chance at making this relationship last. I know we get in arguments sometimes, I think the last one was loud enough the cops might have gotten called, but I really see you trying to improve yourself now.

    I grabbed my ship and dragged it over the background and dropped it, and it activated, then I double clicked the background and opened my cargo hold.

    I love pretty shiny new CQ's when I'm in the mood to play with them (<3 enter CQ button), but I don't like it when it impairs my functionality. There are times I need to be quick to joining alliance ops, super tackled or something, and spending 15 seconds figuring out what ship I logged in and opening my cargo hold to see if I still have ammo was really annoying. I'm glad you listened to the players here CCP. By all means build pretty shinys, but don't reduce functionality to do it.
    Shayde Lemmont
    Morshu's Legion
    #35 - 2011-10-01 19:12:53 UTC
    OS: windows 7 64 bit
    CPU: intel core(TM) q9400 @ 2.66ghz
    GPU Nvidia GTX 285 with 2 GB video ram
    RAM: 8GB
    1 client
    Setting High




    FPS zoomed out 50
    fps zoomed in 25

    fps and performance rating: 8

    crashed around 3 times during test

    This test was my first test and you can bet ill be back to test again so long as I know of when its going on
    rvil fusk
    B.A.S.E.D
    The Initiative.
    #36 - 2011-10-01 19:16:32 UTC
    Machine Info and Settings

    OS version: windows 7 64X home editon
    CPU: intel i5 750 @ 2.67
    GPU: saphire 5850 1 gb
    RAM: 4 gb pariot memory
    Were you running more than one EVE client? yes How many? 2
    Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): all high settings for both clients

    User Experience

    Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: not mesured
    Average FPS - Zoomed in: not mesured

    On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? 5 tq server is normaly a bit more stable save for jita. flying threw space was a bit smoother tho and the warp tunneling effect is working again. (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome)

    Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? yes about 4 times during just before test when i was sitting

    Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: mass test went fairly smothly slowing down the client and speeding it up was ammusing. i had troubles with my autocannons they would only fire if i kept clicking the guns and they would not let me unequip them in station. I also keep geting a picture of space as backround when i dock.
    XLoneStarX
    B.A.S.E.D
    The Initiative.
    #37 - 2011-10-01 19:17:09 UTC

    OS version: windows 7 64X home editon
    CPU: intel i5 750 @ 2.67
    GPU: saphire 5850 1 gb
    RAM: 4 gb pariot memory
    Were you running more than one EVE client? yes How many? 2
    Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): all high settings for both clients

    User Experience

    Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: not mesured
    Average FPS - Zoomed in: not mesured

    On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? 5 tq server is normaly a bit more stable save for jita. flying threw space was a bit smoother tho and the warp tunneling effect is working again. (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome)

    Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? yes about 4 times during just before test when i was sitting

    Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: mass test went fairly smothly slowing down the client and speeding it up was ammusing. i had troubles with my medium hybrdie guns they would only fire if i kept clicking the guns and they would not let me unequip them in station.

    I also keep geting a picture of space as backround when i dock.
    Dies Irare
    The Scope
    Gallente Federation
    #38 - 2011-10-01 19:23:28 UTC

    Machine Info and Settings

    OS version: Win7
    CPU: Intel i7 2600K 3.4 GHz 8 core
    GPU: nVidia GTX460 - 4 Gb ram
    RAM: 8 Gb
    Were you running more than one EVE client? How many? running 1 client only
    Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): all in High

    User Experience

    Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 45~55
    Average FPS - Zoomed in:15~20
    On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome): 8 almost incredible :)
    Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? chrash INdeed in the last part of teh PvP
    Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: i did have problems typing in the chat boxes when we got to the Titan shooting.
    DrNo8910
    I N E X T R E M I S
    Tactical Narcotics Team
    #39 - 2011-10-01 19:24:00 UTC
    Machine Info and Settings

    • OS version: Windows 7 Home Premium
    • CPU: 2.00 GHz
    • GPU: ???
    • RAM: 4 gb's
    • Were you running more than one EVE client? How many? No just one Client
    • Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): Low

    User Experience

    • Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: N/a
    • Average FPS - Zoomed in: Laggy Paused couple times
    • On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 1
    • Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? Before the test i have been disconnecting alot
    • Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Dont get me wrong im not fussin just sayin, that was alot of lagg. lol Good new stuff tho. keep up the good work!!!! :)
    Missile War
    Caldari Provisions
    Caldari State
    #40 - 2011-10-01 19:45:24 UTC
    CCP Habakuk wrote:
    Hi! If you participated in the mass-test on the 1st October, please reply in this thread to give your feedback, based on following template:

    Machine Info and Settings

    • OS version: Windows 7 ultimate
    • CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4000+
    • GPU: NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GT/GTO
    • RAM: 3,00 GB
    • Were you running more than one EVE client? How many? 2
    • Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high):
    low
    User Experience

    • Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 3-6
    • Average FPS - Zoomed in: 2-4
    • On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) nothing to compare it with
    • Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? 3 crashes
    • Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: FPS went higher when it got double timed but didn't go very smooth, when the speed was lowerd alot it went quite smooth. ♥ TiDi when its pausing the game ♥

    Previous page123Next page