These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Is CCP removing faction standing need to setup POS?

First post
Author
Caleb Ayrania
TarNec
Invisible Exchequer
#1 - 2012-05-01 12:55:32 UTC
I was having a rather interesting chat ingame..

We ended up considering if ccp might just plan to remove faction stadning needs to setup POS all together!?

The old calculations method is borked, and a lot of weird work arounds have been used..

Many ideas have been discussed, but as I pointed out the CCP Soundwave solution might just be something like, just remove the thing entirely! Simple and the only result would be more contested space and potential spreading out of player driven facility and services, that might be needed in DUST to move things around. Dust players are pretty land locked, and will in some way be dependent on EVE pilots for the added advanced game features..

So the tl:dr

Is it possible ccp is boosting / nerfing POS anchoring in all sec space?

Kun Tarr
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#2 - 2012-05-01 13:16:13 UTC
Greetings. It doesn't make sense to me. I have spent a lot of time and isk in getting my faction standings where they are today so that I can access all missions within that faction. The ability to place a POS in high sec has it's benefits too, but benefits don't end there. I wouldn't like this taken away unless I get some equivalent benefit in exchange. That's my 2 cents...
RavenTesio
Liandri Corporation
#3 - 2012-05-01 14:12:28 UTC
The standing system isn't broken at all.
The calculations are simple... anyone who has +/- 0.001 Standings Contributes to the Overall Standing, this is based upon the Base Standing (your ACTUAL standing, not Skills Adjusted; which is only for Agents and Taxes) it is then adveraged by the number of contributors.

You can actually see this by right-click > Show Composition in the Corp Standings. It literally is just:

foreach( member ) { total += member } total / members.number = total standings

If you don't have enough for Empire Space then this is purely because your people are not liked, the Show Composition allows you to weed them out and either Kick them or Advice them what they need to work on to help the Corp.

As it is an adverage you'll also find that a majority who have high / max or low / max neg will have the largest effect on the totals.
It is actually one of the more simplistic aspect of EVE once you understand how it works, now allowing Social Skills to be calculated as your actual standings; perhaps might be interesting, but then again there are a number of issues with that as well.
Caleb Ayrania
TarNec
Invisible Exchequer
#4 - 2012-05-01 15:18:45 UTC
This is the type of replies that cause loss of subscriptions..

Endless argument from tradition..

It makes NO SENSE.. That say EVE University or silimar ancient organisations have to empty their corp to setup player owned structures.. If you honestly believe that makes sense, mechanics wise or rp wise three is something wrong in this game beyond repair..

I know the mechnics quite well and understnad them and they are one of the major phail train features to protect server load. If the servers can handle the strain now I will bet you ccp is going to do this in a near future.. If not the dreams mentioned by both Soundwave and Torfi about POS for all eve players is meaningless.

Servers can handle it now, and we have TIDI.. So I am expecting some huge changes.. All the little big things, we have not been able to get until now..

Kusum Fawn
Perkone
Caldari State
#5 - 2012-05-01 15:32:14 UTC
wut?

Its not possible to please all the people all the time, but it sure as hell is possible to Displease all the people, most of the time.

Acid Kanshi
AIFAM
#6 - 2012-05-01 16:49:58 UTC  |  Edited by: Acid Kanshi
Having a POS in high security empire space SHOULD have standing requirements. It would be weird if some random dude who is hated by Minmatar, puts up a POS in minmatar space. It goes even against logic.

Having a POS in empire space is a BONUS from the high standing you have with them.

Bonus table: http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Standings_mechanics#Quick_Standings_Reference_Table

Having this big bonus removed from Bonus table, what does that leave to Standing mechanic in general? Almost nothing, it cancels the entire idea of standings in the game, because POS is one of the biggest reasons why people get standings at all.

Sure there are these high standing corp sellers etc. Maybe it's a feature as a profession to sell POS solutions for people. Getting profit from his high standings. Maybe they will change it soon, but I belive they just have to change a bit the mechanic works, so it wont be acessable so easily to people. Increase the standing requirement?

But I belive standings must stay for sure, it generates more "individuality" in the game. People who bother to get high standings get rewards, people who don't, then well... they come here whine on forums like you? :P

My 2 cents.

EVE-Cost is a manufacturing tool for EVE players. http://www.eve-cost.eu

Fish Hunter
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#7 - 2012-05-01 17:18:02 UTC
This is one of the benefits of standings, and a major way to inflict pain on certain war targets. It definatelly has meaning.
Caleb Ayrania
TarNec
Invisible Exchequer
#8 - 2012-05-01 17:39:05 UTC
I dont disagree entirely.. but hear me out for a second..

Current standing grind is very old player biased, and can potentially set off a lot of new players. The work arounds for this is no solution and its basically unfair to those that grinded "legit"..

However if they remove the current standing demand, and the "price tag" and demand shifts onto the LP market via starbase charters, the the standing grind still means a lot to the cost of running a POS.

There should ofc still be something like a minimum of good standing, so around 5.

All the benefits of standing would shift onto other features and mainly be around taxing and fees.

So everyone would benefit, old and new players. The really interesting thing would be that more space would get populated and contested. That would add game play to all of EVE.

Also it might make it possible to better nerf npc services and npc corps as they are.. Since the motivation to form even small corps would increase a lot..

Kelduum Revaan
The Ebon Hawk
#9 - 2012-05-01 17:42:51 UTC
Caleb Ayrania wrote:
That say EVE University or silimar ancient organisations have to empty their corp to setup player owned structures..
Just mentioning this quickly as we get this every so often: We have a separate corp within the alliance which holds the POS, otherwise standings for that kind of thing would be interesting.
Caleb Ayrania
TarNec
Invisible Exchequer
#10 - 2012-05-01 18:44:20 UTC
Yes as the rep from EVE-U points out everyone is using the same work arounds. Holding companies and standing boosting services. I honestly dont believe that can be said to be "working as intended" its a rather complicated and clamped together system, based mainly on eve code history.

When you war dec you want targets, you dont want members to easily be able to bail and jump into protected npc corps. This mechanic is getting looked at and tweaked, the exact same can be said about POS mechanics and holding corps.

As said this issue is def not new, its been brought up time and time again, and all manner of complicated solutions suggested..

I am merely pointing out there is one that is extremely simple. Just remove the demand and let it shift onto the player driven economy and ecology. The benefits will remain and even make a higher impact, than before. Since say EVE-U had 25 POS but their average standing would grant a benefit on small groups that did not dilute their standing. Thus the benefits from manhours and logistics would be levelled out a bit by persistence and small group of trusted friends..

In such a scenario I do think agent hand outs need to be boosted a bit to those with good standing. So you got more LP with standing as well as true sec and social skills. The result would again support the loss to the "nerf"..