These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Fair Warning: Hulkageddon V Backlash Predicted

First post
Author
Skex Relbore
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#161 - 2012-04-30 05:29:15 UTC
Eternum Praetorian wrote:
Tallian Saotome wrote:
Eternum Praetorian wrote:
And here i was thinking that people joined EVE because of this instead



Ah... the good old days * wipes away tear.
On second thought, it's so much better to have people joining who dream of ripping off alliances and ganking idiots. So much better!

It is better....



Then dare I say that you are an idiot kind sir.
And no, I do not wish to further converse with you (nor entertain the ludicrous idea of) how EVE Never Fades HQ compares (or does not compare) to the "stealing from alliance" trailer. Reason being....they are not on the same level, galaxy or dimension of awesome.


That trailer you linked was so dull I couldn't even force myself to finish it. The thing to remember about treachery and double dealing being possible is that it means that trust has real meaning in this game. Because trust the most valuable commodity in the game and you can't have real trust where betrayal isn't an option.

In the end the Goons are probably the most honest and trustworthy group in this game. This is why they are successful. They tell everyone straight up that unless you are blue to them they will do their damnedest to scam you, gank you and make you miserable. You always know where you stand with Goons you are either an ally or a potential victim. It's not their fault everyone thinks they are a special snowflake.


Amanda Holland
Doomheim
#162 - 2012-04-30 06:14:11 UTC
I was under the understand that the devs used things like Hulkageddon TO test the rules in the game and when cracks become evident TO seal them up.

Well HaG and the forums as I believe the boomerang thing was nixed cause one guy went on the forums and went "look what I can do"

ლ(ಠ益ಠლ) vroom vroom motorcycle CCP to the sandbox: "This "adapt or die" attitude is nothing new to EVE, but we want to give it a constant rhythm that is a bit more under our control than in the past"

Tallian Saotome
Nuclear Arms Exchange Inc.
#163 - 2012-04-30 06:40:39 UTC
Eternum Praetorian wrote:
Tallian Saotome wrote:
Eternum Praetorian wrote:
And here i was thinking that people joined EVE because of this instead



Ah... the good old days * wipes away tear.
On second thought, it's so much better to have people joining who dream of ripping off alliances and ganking idiots. So much better!

It is better....



Then dare I say that you are an idiot kind sir.
And no, I do not wish to further converse with you (nor entertain the ludicrous idea of) how EVE Never Fades HQ compares (or does not compare) to the "stealing from alliance" trailer. Reason being....they are not on the same level, galaxy or dimension of awesome.

I never said it was a bad trailer. It takes more than pretty pictures to make me want to play a game, tho, and if you are so shallow that you would choose to play a game based on its trailer and not its gameplay, then you sir, are a truly sad individual.

Inappropriate signature removed, CCP Phantom.

Tallian Saotome
Nuclear Arms Exchange Inc.
#164 - 2012-04-30 06:52:21 UTC  |  Edited by: Tallian Saotome
Tyberius Franklin wrote:
Again, trying to direct where a mining ship should be isn't terribly purposeful. I to this day still don't see how 30k EHP somehow screams this is a nullsec ship. EHP in the millions on a ship or area effect damage like bombs have logical arguments, but the performance and tank of a hulk don't nearly measure up, which is why caps and bombs aren't in highsec and hulks are. If the exhumers were infact meant to be a nullsec ships due to their resilience, they really are terrible ships.

I'm sorry that you fail to understand how nullsec survival works. You don't expect ANYTHING to survive a gank. Even titans get ganked in nullsec.

Exhumers in general, and hulks in specific, were designed with nullsec mining in mind. They were given big enough tanks to be able to deal with the rats out here, and thats all they need. If you have half a brain, then you don't sit there and wait for someone to show up, you warp out as soon as you see yellow in local. If you cannot warp out before they manage to probe out the hidden belt you are in(you don't think nullsec miners mine in normal belts, do you?) and then warp to you, then you are clearly afk mining and doing it wrong.

You don't survive being ganked by having a big tank, you survive being ganked by being smart enough not to be there when the ganker arrives, and since you know anyone you see who isn't blue is a ganker, its not all that hard. Again, this assume you are not an afk miner, in which case I hope you get ganked to hard you finally quit eve, because you are terrible.

Then again, I guess I should just sell your name to my pirate friends so they know whos name to run through their locators for an easy kill.

Inappropriate signature removed, CCP Phantom.

Serene Repose
#165 - 2012-04-30 07:23:15 UTC
Marlona Sky wrote:
So what exactly are you saying? We should tone down the Jita burning and Hulkaggedon to a diet version? Lol
He's saying there are those who are slaves to their excesses, and CCP is mom slapping things out of their hands.

We must accommodate the idiocracy.

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#166 - 2012-04-30 07:46:30 UTC
Tallian Saotome wrote:
Tyberius Franklin wrote:
Again, trying to direct where a mining ship should be isn't terribly purposeful. I to this day still don't see how 30k EHP somehow screams this is a nullsec ship. EHP in the millions on a ship or area effect damage like bombs have logical arguments, but the performance and tank of a hulk don't nearly measure up, which is why caps and bombs aren't in highsec and hulks are. If the exhumers were infact meant to be a nullsec ships due to their resilience, they really are terrible ships.

I'm sorry that you fail to understand how nullsec survival works. You don't expect ANYTHING to survive a gank. Even titans get ganked in nullsec.

Exhumers in general, and hulks in specific, were designed with nullsec mining in mind. They were given big enough tanks to be able to deal with the rats out here, and thats all they need. If you have half a brain, then you don't sit there and wait for someone to show up, you warp out as soon as you see yellow in local. If you cannot warp out before they manage to probe out the hidden belt you are in(you don't think nullsec miners mine in normal belts, do you?) and then warp to you, then you are clearly afk mining and doing it wrong.

You don't survive being ganked by having a big tank, you survive being ganked by being smart enough not to be there when the ganker arrives, and since you know anyone you see who isn't blue is a ganker, its not all that hard. Again, this assume you are not an afk miner, in which case I hope you get ganked to hard you finally quit eve, because you are terrible.

Then again, I guess I should just sell your name to my pirate friends so they know whos name to run through their locators for an easy kill.

You missed my point completely. First off, if your pirate friend wait for me to be in a hulk to gank me, i hope they have something else to do in the meantime. If you think I'm afraid of ganks, you're sorely mistaken. If you think you can impress my by threatening to hire other to do your dirty work, I guess there's no helping you. But more to the point, this isn't about surviving ganks, it's about a noncombat ship being confined to more combative space. As you yourself have stated if the only difference is tanking of NPC's then really there is no strong reason to direct people to null/low for the use of the ship. It's advantages are universal as far as it's capacity as a miner and in highsec, where you can't just say "look, an unknown in local" it does provide some chance of survival of a gank attempt, should you be caught in one, which would have worked on a lesser ship.
Tallian Saotome
Nuclear Arms Exchange Inc.
#167 - 2012-04-30 08:00:50 UTC
Tyberius Franklin wrote:
You missed my point completely. First off, if your pirate friend wait for me to be in a hulk to gank me, i hope they have something else to do in the meantime. If you think I'm afraid of ganks, you're sorely mistaken. If you think you can impress my by threatening to hire other to do your dirty work, I guess there's no helping you. But more to the point, this isn't about surviving ganks, it's about a noncombat ship being confined to more combative space. As you yourself have stated if the only difference is tanking of NPC's then really there is no strong reason to direct people to null/low for the use of the ship. It's advantages are universal as far as it's capacity as a miner and in highsec, where you can't just say "look, an unknown in local" it does provide some chance of survival of a gank attempt, should you be caught in one, which would have worked on a lesser ship.

First, not a threat, just a joke. Way to take things far too seriously. Roll

Second, there is no such thing as non-combative space in EVE, so we have found out why you are failing to understand.

Third, you are correct, as things stand there is no real reason to take a hulk to nullsec(unless you want to mine ABCs), other than the fact that an intelligent person can mine in more safety in null than in high, even tho it was designed with nullsec in mind. That is exactly why I was suggesting GIVING them a reason.

This is the whole problem with the current attitudes of the mining profession, as well as the problem with the risk:reward balance in highsec vs nullsec. Highsec gives you an illusory sense of safety because you think CONCORD is supposed to save you, while nullsec makes you feel in danger, which will make you behave in ways that will increase your odds of survival. If you play smart in highsec, you can be far safer because of CONCORD, but people like to stay in well populated systems and mine while AFK.

I can tell ya that a solo miner in a hulk, without any kind of boosting support, can make 50 mil/hr mining ABCs, which seems to make the miners I work with all kinds of happy(I haven't mined in 3 years or so, so I dunno how much highsec mining makes) but they do have to go into hiding fairly often because of hostiles in local.

I guess this is the last reply to you tho, since you appear to refuse to actually understand how the game is supposed to work, and think your hulk should just be able to tank a gank fleet.

Inappropriate signature removed, CCP Phantom.

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#168 - 2012-04-30 08:17:30 UTC
Tallian Saotome wrote:
Tyberius Franklin wrote:
You missed my point completely. First off, if your pirate friend wait for me to be in a hulk to gank me, i hope they have something else to do in the meantime. If you think I'm afraid of ganks, you're sorely mistaken. If you think you can impress my by threatening to hire other to do your dirty work, I guess there's no helping you. But more to the point, this isn't about surviving ganks, it's about a noncombat ship being confined to more combative space. As you yourself have stated if the only difference is tanking of NPC's then really there is no strong reason to direct people to null/low for the use of the ship. It's advantages are universal as far as it's capacity as a miner and in highsec, where you can't just say "look, an unknown in local" it does provide some chance of survival of a gank attempt, should you be caught in one, which would have worked on a lesser ship.

First, not a threat, just a joke. Way to take things far too seriously. Roll

Second, there is no such thing as non-combative space in EVE, so we have found out why you are failing to understand.

Third, you are correct, as things stand there is no real reason to take a hulk to nullsec(unless you want to mine ABCs), other than the fact that an intelligent person can mine in more safety in null than in high, even tho it was designed with nullsec in mind. That is exactly why I was suggesting GIVING them a reason.

This is the whole problem with the current attitudes of the mining profession, as well as the problem with the risk:reward balance in highsec vs nullsec. Highsec gives you an illusory sense of safety because you think CONCORD is supposed to save you, while nullsec makes you feel in danger, which will make you behave in ways that will increase your odds of survival. If you play smart in highsec, you can be far safer because of CONCORD, but people like to stay in well populated systems and mine while AFK.

I can tell ya that a solo miner in a hulk, without any kind of boosting support, can make 50 mil/hr mining ABCs, which seems to make the miners I work with all kinds of happy(I haven't mined in 3 years or so, so I dunno how much highsec mining makes) but they do have to go into hiding fairly often because of hostiles in local.

I guess this is the last reply to you tho, since you appear to refuse to actually understand how the game is supposed to work, and think your hulk should just be able to tank a gank fleet.

Tanking ganks has been done before, but I suppose this could be put more on the lack of proper preparation on the gankers part. I never said highsec was non-combative, but there are clear differences in combat practices in the various sec bands. I've never been bubble camped in highsec (though the time it happened in null it was my dumb ass fault... on both occasions Oops), I have been ganked in highsec, once successfully, once not, but in each case it was for a specific reason I was chosen, whereas in low it was just because they saw someone who wasn't one of them and thought they could kill it (they were right). Different rules of engagement change the way PvP is done in most cases and in the case of high it makes the hulk a good contender for a mining ship across all sec bands. Sure, one could suggest it be more focused elsewhere, but it seems ironic for someone who is advocating their ability to do what they want in game to be suggesting that the tools of others be pigeonholed like that, which was really my point more than anything else.
Tallian Saotome
Nuclear Arms Exchange Inc.
#169 - 2012-04-30 09:24:41 UTC  |  Edited by: Tallian Saotome
Tyberius Franklin wrote:

Tanking ganks has been done before, but I suppose this could be put more on the lack of proper preparation on the gankers part. I never said highsec was non-combative, but there are clear differences in combat practices in the various sec bands. I've never been bubble camped in highsec (though the time it happened in null it was my dumb ass fault... on both occasions Oops), I have been ganked in highsec, once successfully, once not, but in each case it was for a specific reason I was chosen, whereas in low it was just because they saw someone who wasn't one of them and thought they could kill it (they were right). Different rules of engagement change the way PvP is done in most cases and in the case of high it makes the hulk a good contender for a mining ship across all sec bands. Sure, one could suggest it be more focused elsewhere, but it seems ironic for someone who is advocating their ability to do what they want in game to be suggesting that the tools of others be pigeonholed like that, which was really my point more than anything else.

Ok, breaking my no reply thing since you actually posted a reasonable response :)

I don't, in any way what so ever, think that any ship currently allowed in highsec should be removed from it.

I DO think that giving a hulk a bonus to mining ABC ores, ON TOP of what it already has, would be a good thing, as it would provide both a reason for miners to take their hulks down to null, and provide a much needed boost to nullsec industry.

I honestly can understand why you seem so opposed to a 100% buff to hulks, just because it doesn't also buff highsec miners. I happen to like miners, tho I do think most highsec miners do need to HTFU and get over their fear of low and null. I run daily mining ops out in nullsec(I do it from an orca or rorqual) and those that we have are really great dudes, who almost never get mad about losing their hulks, because they realize it happens.

Yes, the rules are different, but you seem to think that mining outside of highsec is fieryhelldeathofdoomincarnate, or that nullsec should not be a more profitable place to be to balance the fact that it is more dangerous(as long as you play smart, highsec is extremely safe, but we get people we KNOW will kill us all the time) and alot more work(do you think sov takes and holds itself?)

Hulks, and exhumers as a whole, could use some buffs to make them more appropriate to sectors of space other than highsec, and this could very easily be done without actually nerfing them for highsec. Give hulks bonuses to mining ABCs, and give Covetors, say, a massive agility boost, so they can get out of danger in lowsec in a reasonable way(grabbed that off the top of my head) and you have just made mining low and nullsec ores a much more viable option, without having to rebalance half the game around it.

Edit: Can you break your paragraphs up so its easy to break the post into multiple quotes for ease of addressing individual points?

Inappropriate signature removed, CCP Phantom.

Gerald Taric
NEO DYNAMICS
#170 - 2012-04-30 09:56:55 UTC
Mr Epeen wrote:
Ganking miners. YEE HAA! until everyone started doing it = ???
Does it need a "nerf"? If there are no ores left, who will build all the nice battleships of ... what again? Will "reprocessing" looted items compensate it enough?

At last i wonder, why so much people seems to be fixed to Jita. If it's too risky to buy/sell in Jita, then it might be more profitable (in the average) to sell/buy elsewhere for 5 ISK less profit per item?
Tallian Saotome
Nuclear Arms Exchange Inc.
#171 - 2012-04-30 10:00:24 UTC
Gerald Taric wrote:
Mr Epeen wrote:
Ganking miners. YEE HAA! until everyone started doing it = ???
Does it need a "nerf"? If there are no ores left, who will build all the nice battleships of ... what again? Will "reprocessing" looted items compensate it enough?

At last i wonder, why so much people seems to be fixed to Jita. If it's too risky to buy/sell in Jita, then it might be more profitable (in the average) to sell/buy elsewhere for 5 ISK less profit per item?

Probably not, but low and nullsec miners will get so rich its not even funny Cool

Inappropriate signature removed, CCP Phantom.

Alain Kinsella
#172 - 2012-04-30 10:55:49 UTC
I think there's a misquote going 'round (or perhaps worded it wrong). My suggested 'ban' would go alongside either giving them a real tank (i.e. a Drake) or decent agility (i.e. Blockade Runner). Some of this is based on the common saying around here that 'no ship should out-mine a Hulk,' which in turn makes me keep placing it into the Capital ship class - end-of-the-line.

I do admit the below is a better idea. I'm used to looking over the very long term (1.5-2+ years in Eve's case) as I maintain a tape backups environment. Unfortunately that does cause the occasional 'not seeing what's in front of you.' Smile

There's still the problem of what to do with the Mackinaw and the Procurer. The former really does need a fitting tweak - just a little one. The latter is a challenge, as its only common purpose in life now is being the seed ship for a Skiff.

Tallian Saotome wrote:

I don't, in any way what so ever, think that any ship currently allowed in highsec should be removed from it.

I DO think that giving a hulk a bonus to mining ABC ores, ON TOP of what it already has, would be a good thing, as it would provide both a reason for miners to take their hulks down to null, and provide a much needed boost to nullsec industry.

I honestly can understand why you seem so opposed to a 100% buff to hulks, just because it doesn't also buff highsec miners. I happen to like miners, tho I do think most highsec miners do need to HTFU and get over their fear of low and null. I run daily mining ops out in nullsec(I do it from an orca or rorqual) and those that we have are really great dudes, who almost never get mad about losing their hulks, because they realize it happens.

Yes, the rules are different, but you seem to think that mining outside of highsec is fieryhelldeathofdoomincarnate, or that nullsec should not be a more profitable place to be to balance the fact that it is more dangerous(as long as you play smart, highsec is extremely safe, but we get people we KNOW will kill us all the time) and alot more work(do you think sov takes and holds itself?)

Hulks, and exhumers as a whole, could use some buffs to make them more appropriate to sectors of space other than highsec, and this could very easily be done without actually nerfing them for highsec. Give hulks bonuses to mining ABCs, and give Covetors, say, a massive agility boost, so they can get out of danger in lowsec in a reasonable way(grabbed that off the top of my head) and you have just made mining low and nullsec ores a much more viable option, without having to rebalance half the game around it.

Edit: Can you break your paragraphs up so its easy to break the post into multiple quotes for ease of addressing individual points?

"The Meta Game does not stop at the game. Ever."

Currently Retired / Semi-Casual (pending changes to RL concerns).

Eternum Praetorian
Doomheim
#173 - 2012-04-30 11:03:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Eternum Praetorian
Tallian Saotome wrote:
Rants for pages


I don't think your medication is working properly anymore, just saying. Eve never fades is win because it is win, it represents the dream of eve not simply shiny. The good Null sec miners are already filthy rich, and even better.... why don't you go try and get rich in low sec for me? lol I would be happy to nuke my sec status again if people decided to start doing that.




All in all, I hope that I have offered proof enough that your medication is no longer effective. Contact your local healthcare professional for dose modification for best results. After a year or too you know, your body gets used to it and then you might as well be taking a placebo.

[center]The EVE Gateway Blog[/center] [center]One Of EVE Online's Ultimate Resources[/center]

Tallian Saotome
Nuclear Arms Exchange Inc.
#174 - 2012-04-30 11:32:29 UTC
Eternum Praetorian wrote:
Tallian Saotome wrote:
Rants for pages


I don't think your medication is working properly anymore, just saying. Eve never fades is win because it is win, it represents the dream of eve not simply shiny. The good Null sec miners are already filthy rich, and even better.... why don't you go try and get rich in low sec for me? lol I would be happy to nuke my sec status again if people decided to start doing that.




All in all, I hope that I have offered proof enough that your medication is no longer effective. Contact your local healthcare professional for dose modification for best results. After a year or too you know, your body gets used to it and then you might as well be taking a placebo.

If its a rant, report it, as rants are a violation of the TOS for the forums and will get those posts deleted, and probably me forum banned for a day or 2. Shocked

ofc, abusing the reporting system for petty reasons is also a TOS violation, so if I am not actually ranting, but engaging in intelligent debate, you might just get yourself banned Cool

Perhaps we should find out who exactly is ranting without thinking, and who is engaging in some actual intelligent constructive discussion? Pirate

Inappropriate signature removed, CCP Phantom.

Eternum Praetorian
Doomheim
#175 - 2012-04-30 11:45:14 UTC
Another ridiculous statement, you are on a roll. Half of everyone here would be banned if that was even remotely true. Also, CCP seems to have banned your inappropriate signature. I guess someone at the top doesn't like what you have to say either?

[center]The EVE Gateway Blog[/center] [center]One Of EVE Online's Ultimate Resources[/center]

Amanda Holland
Doomheim
#176 - 2012-04-30 11:50:47 UTC  |  Edited by: Amanda Holland
Tallian Saotome wrote:

I'm sorry that you fail to understand how nullsec survival works. .


lol
ah mining in null...
*nomming rock*
"AAAAH RED/NUL IN SYSTEM"
*WARPS to POS/station*

repeat. I felt like a cockroach :p


Eternum Praetorian wrote:
Another ridiculous statement, you are on a roll. Half of everyone here would be banned if that was even remotely true. Also, CCP seems to have banned your inappropriate signature. I guess someone at the top doesn't like what you have to say either?



man I hate ppl that bang on the report button when they dont agree with a statement. NOT cause it violates the rules but cause they dont agree...

DMC comes to mind

ლ(ಠ益ಠლ) vroom vroom motorcycle CCP to the sandbox: "This "adapt or die" attitude is nothing new to EVE, but we want to give it a constant rhythm that is a bit more under our control than in the past"

Hatt0ri Hanz0
Life sucks then you die Ltd.
#177 - 2012-04-30 11:59:27 UTC
I actually agree, to a point, with the OP's post. Anytime an action gets alot of attention by CCP, there's a risk they are going to deem it needs adjusting. Since it appears that suiciding hulks/barges is very popular these days, judging by the amount of crying on the forums, it wouldn't surprise me that CCP has been looking at it. They do have a company to run/keep alive.
TheBlueMonkey
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#178 - 2012-04-30 12:04:16 UTC
So people overuse\exploite ships into doing things that CCP find undesireable, so CCP ballance them and this is bad?
Eternum Praetorian
Doomheim
#179 - 2012-04-30 12:10:58 UTC
TheBlueMonkey wrote:
So people overuse\exploite ships into doing things that CCP find undesireable, so CCP ballance them and this is bad?



I find your ability to read text and miss the point entirely, while at the sometime drawing to wildly misconstrued conclusions, quite mesmerizing. Can you do it again?

* anticipates.

[center]The EVE Gateway Blog[/center] [center]One Of EVE Online's Ultimate Resources[/center]

Tallian Saotome
Nuclear Arms Exchange Inc.
#180 - 2012-04-30 12:16:03 UTC
Eternum Praetorian wrote:
Another ridiculous statement, you are on a roll. Half of everyone here would be banned if that was even remotely true. Also, CCP seems to have banned your inappropriate signature. I guess someone at the top doesn't like what you have to say either?

Someone was offended by a song about gynocology and reported me. Was removed as not being eve related, try again Blink

Amanda Holland wrote:


lol
ah mining in null...
*nomming rock*
"AAAAH RED/NUL IN SYSTEM"
*WARPS to POS/station*

repeat. I felt like a cockroach :p


Usually, yeah, tho I am usually just permanently parked in the pos myself boosting from an orca or rorqual on my indy alt.

Occasionally tho, I take pity on them and park a carrier in the belt with them, which has the startling effect of causing us to be left alone by 90% of the hostiles that come in, and those that do ignore the hulk to tackle me, giving me a chance to cal in backup while the miners escape.

More than one way to skin a cat.

Inappropriate signature removed, CCP Phantom.