These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123Next page
 

Rewards for reporting botters in game.

Author
Ciar Meara
PIE Inc.
Khimi Harar
#21 - 2011-09-29 07:57:22 UTC
CCP has unofficially rewarded bothunters in the past, I think with plex but that has not been clear.

- [img]http://go-dl1.eve-files.com/media/corp/janus/ceosig.jpg[/img] [yellow]English only please. Zymurgist[/yellow]

KaarBaak
Squirrel Team
#22 - 2011-09-29 12:22:41 UTC  |  Edited by: KaarBaak
non judgement wrote:
do you know what sarcasm is?


Look at his avatar....it looks like he starches his underwear.

I do not believe he understands sarcasm or has a sense of humor of any sort.

As for Bot-hunting rewards....

If you want to reward bot hunters, add this: a player incurs a 7-day ban for every 3d bot report that proves unfounded?

Dum Spiro Spero

Vincent Athena
Photosynth
#23 - 2011-09-29 17:33:20 UTC
The Apostle wrote:
........

If bots are actively getting hunted and nailed hard and fast, how many would start getting rather nervous? Though in my mind, it would really only kill off casual bots. Serious botters just recycle/purchase new chars.
.


The ban is against the account, not the character. Getting a new character does not remove a botting strike. So what botters have to do is start a new account, train a pilot, bot on it until its "used up" then cancel it, get a new one and start again.

CCP Sreegs has said he is trying to figure out how to verify the identity of players as he really wants the botting strikes to be against an actual person. That is what he wants is if you bot and get banned 3 times, you are personally banned from eve for life.

On the OP proposal:

If players got any feedback on their success at finding bots, then the botters could use that information to see what tricks they use are fooling people, and make better bots. They would do that by making test reports on test bots, and see if it results in a reward. Is that worth it for 100 AUR?

Know a Frozen fan? Check this out

Frozen fanfiction

Andrea Roche
State War Academy
Caldari State
#24 - 2011-09-29 17:44:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Andrea Roche
yes reward active reporting of bots.
If it turns to be a botter, give the reporter a nice amount of isk..Like a billion...
If this is implemented botting will die in months maybe even days
I can already see people creating corps for this since its profitable.
Lucien Visteen
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#25 - 2011-09-29 17:55:01 UTC
You should take a look at this

A dev blog on how to responsibly report security issues

And also go here

Reporting Security Issues

If you have questions.

Atleast if I get your meaning behind this correctly

The ships hung in the sky in much the same way that bricks don't.

Minabunny
Bogus Brothers Corporation
#26 - 2011-09-29 18:16:44 UTC
Those that report pilots that turn out NOT to be bots should be penalized for wasting CCP's time and the accused pilots time. On top of that the 'reward' should be given to the falsely accused pilot.
Andrea Roche
State War Academy
Caldari State
#27 - 2011-09-29 18:57:36 UTC  |  Edited by: Andrea Roche
Minabunny wrote:
Those that report pilots that turn out NOT to be bots should be penalized for wasting CCP's time and the accused pilots time. On top of that the 'reward' should be given to the falsely accused pilot.


its ccp job to monitor and figger out things true or false. And no, you do not reward the acused since the accused would not know about it...Its all transperent to the acused so you do not reward the acused XD
N1gella Laws0n
Doomheim
#28 - 2011-09-29 19:04:56 UTC
Cypermethren wrote:

They would only ever bother with this much effort if CCP ACTUALY ADHERED TO ITS OWN ELUA/T&C and stopped looking the other way when it comes to botting/RMT.



There is nothing in the EULA/TAC/TOS/Whatever that puts ANY onus on CCP to do ANYTHING about people who cheat, or in fact anything at all.

They literally accept no responsibility for anything, but happily accept any and all money people are still dumb enough to send them.

They perform the bare minimum of tasks they think they can get away with to keep the dollars rolling in. That's capitalism baby. Everything is done down to a price, not up to a standard.

You want to see CCP act? Cut in on their business. Start selling ISK, then you'll see them move. (Unless you're a particular ex-CSM member who does all the RMT character trading in which case you will be overlooked)
Herping yourDerp
Tribal Liberation Force
Minmatar Republic
#29 - 2011-09-29 23:05:16 UTC
most bots per month found gets a statue infront of jita.
Digital Messiah
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#30 - 2011-09-29 23:43:22 UTC
non judgement wrote:
do you know what sarcasm is?

1. mocking, contemptuous, or ironic language intended to convey scorn or insult
2. the use or tone of such language

The first part I got, the second part is hard to determine through text. Either way, why not add constructive feedback instead of being sarcastic?

Something clever

Renan Ruivo
Forcas armadas
Brave Collective
#31 - 2011-09-29 23:46:38 UTC
Digital Messiah wrote:
Renan Ruivo wrote:
Well.. that would increase the amount of bot reports that CCP has to look into tenfold. Have you ever seen a local precinct when it offers a reward for, say, a missing person?

You get people calling in and saying that aliens have abducted said person. And i'm not talking about people who just call in to troll because those will troll wether you offer a reward or not. But the people who actually believes that aliens abducted that person.

People will start seeing bots everywhere.

And if people blatantly abuse the feature than they to get punished for doing so.


Well.. you cant punish someone for being overzealous... otherwise you're just beating your own original argument.

The world is a community of idiots doing a series of things until it explodes and we all die.

Digital Messiah
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#32 - 2011-09-29 23:51:58 UTC
Renan Ruivo wrote:
Digital Messiah wrote:
Renan Ruivo wrote:
Well.. that would increase the amount of bot reports that CCP has to look into tenfold. Have you ever seen a local precinct when it offers a reward for, say, a missing person?

You get people calling in and saying that aliens have abducted said person. And i'm not talking about people who just call in to troll because those will troll wether you offer a reward or not. But the people who actually believes that aliens abducted that person.

People will start seeing bots everywhere.

And if people blatantly abuse the feature than they to get punished for doing so.


Well.. you cant punish someone for being overzealous... otherwise you're just beating your own original argument.

I did say blatantly. There is a difference between someone reporting mass hulks a few jumps out of jita, and someone who is spamming everyone they dislike as a bot. Though I know what you mean by how confusing things could get with either type and telling them apart.

Something clever

Signal11th
#33 - 2011-09-30 08:32:08 UTC
I'd say no because if the reward isn't good enough nobody is going to bother and if the reward is goo/too good all that going to happen is people will recycle their bot accounts and make even more on them by reporting their own bots.

God Said "Come Forth and receive eternal life!" I came fifth and won a toaster!

Apollo-Moor
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#34 - 2011-09-30 09:09:19 UTC
Andrea Roche wrote:
Minabunny wrote:
Those that report pilots that turn out NOT to be bots should be penalized for wasting CCP's time and the accused pilots time. On top of that the 'reward' should be given to the falsely accused pilot.


its ccp job to monitor and figger out things true or false. And no, you do not reward the acused since the accused would not know about it...Its all transperent to the acused so you do not reward the acused XD


Someone explain wtf this guy is trying to say?

Botters are bad. Rewards for catching a confirmed botter maybe. Exposing botter in every fashion including bans AWESOME!
CBBOMBERMAN
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#35 - 2011-09-30 15:39:16 UTC  |  Edited by: CBBOMBERMAN
Signal11th wrote:
I'd say no because if the reward isn't good enough nobody is going to bother and if the reward is goo/too good all that going to happen is people will recycle their bot accounts and make even more on them by reporting their own bots.


its very easy to stop this...
make the bot reporting based on training of the bot
So if the learned skills is little then reward is little
If the learned skills is high then reward is higher,
this can be done in a way that its more expensive to train the bot/pilot
but it is still very profitable for the reporter.
Think about it this way...a pilot with 30m skill points is worth about 2/4 billion?
If you get a 1 billion for reporting of such pilot is not profitable for the "scam artists/self report"
but very profitable for a bot hunter! XD
They just got to make it so that the reward is 70-80% of the value of the bot based on skills.

You can even get some kind of archivement after certain amount of bots. Maybe even a price to encourage reporting.

This can be done. And still profitable
Andrea Roche
State War Academy
Caldari State
#36 - 2011-09-30 15:55:14 UTC
CBBOMBERMAN wrote:
Signal11th wrote:
I'd say no because if the reward isn't good enough nobody is going to bother and if the reward is goo/too good all that going to happen is people will recycle their bot accounts and make even more on them by reporting their own bots.


its very easy to stop this...
make the bot reporting based on training of the bot
So if the learned skills is little then reward is little
If the learned skills is high then reward is higher,
this can be done in a way that its more expensive to train the bot/pilot
but it is still very profitable for the reporter.
Think about it this way...a pilot with 30m skill points is worth about 2/4 billion?
If you get a 1 billion for reporting of such pilot is not profitable for the "scam artists/self report"
but very profitable for a bot hunter! XD
They just got to make it so that the reward is 70-80% of the value of the bot based on skills.

You can even get some kind of archivement after certain amount of bots. Maybe even a price to encourage reporting.

This can be done. And still profitable


i can see pirates gettting into this too.
Buruk Utama
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#37 - 2011-09-30 21:05:45 UTC
Vincent Athena wrote:
The Apostle wrote:
........

If bots are actively getting hunted and nailed hard and fast, how many would start getting rather nervous? Though in my mind, it would really only kill off casual bots. Serious botters just recycle/purchase new chars.
.


The ban is against the account, not the character. Getting a new character does not remove a botting strike. So what botters have to do is start a new account, train a pilot, bot on it until its "used up" then cancel it, get a new one and start again.


Botters do not have to train any pilot, they buy them via the character bazaar in which you'll notice a majority of the pilots sold are miners. Why is this, because the demand for miners from bots are high, then you hop over to the plex bazaar and you'll see the same names buying plexes for pilots they purchased, sometimes up to 6 different pilots per post. It only cost a few billion isk to buy the pilot, another few million to outfit and that bot has made back the cost in no time.
Hans Jagerblitzen
Ice Fire Warriors
#38 - 2011-09-30 23:03:32 UTC  |  Edited by: Hans Jagerblitzen
Digital Messiah wrote:
Seeing as giving players assets, isk, or non-vanity items is out of the question. I thought, what the hell why not award aurum? Say for every bot a player "properly" reports. AKA, they aren't going around jita local spamming buttons. Then said player will receive something around 100 aurum when that bot is caught.


People going around spamming "bot" is exactly whats going to happen.

Bots are what everyone likes to blame for Eve's problems, but they are also nearly impossible to prove exist on any kind of significant scale.

The moderators just closed a thread about this highly controversial issue, arguments about bots tend to erupt into megathreads because half the playerbase is crazy paranoid and assumes bots are everywhere, and are somehow the primary menace plaguing eve online and supposedly "ruining" the economy, whereas the other half of the population has never seen a bot, or just doesnt care if you make some afk isk.

Until anyone can post information proving bots exist on a massive scale and somehow threaten the economy overall (which no one has), it boils down to case-by-case bot reporting. You either care enough to observe, detect, and report, or you dont. But sitting around saying that either other players or CCP needs to jump on an anti-bot crusade is both an ancient and pointless pastime.

CCP does what they can to crush bots when they find them, players report them when they do, but no matter how much botting gets shut down, it will continue, as will the players that refuse to accept that CCP is doing anything about bots to begin with.

To the OP - I think you're better off simply ignoring the idea that bots are destroying the game, stop listening to the masses, and simply do the sensible thing - report a bot if you see it, and relax if you dont.

Any bit of AFK isk one can earn is a trickle compared to the amount of isk someone can make actually playing the game, anyways. Most bot raging happens because non-nullsec people assume that nullsec is nothing but botters, and the bot outcries are rooted in bigotry more than fact. Or, people call out multi-boxers as botters and innocent players end up getting banned for playing the game legit. Either way, its silly. Even the botters themselves admit it barely keeps their accounts active, which is sad because if you feel you need bots to keep up with the guy next door, you're just not very creative. From scamming to looting pinatas to starting a gambling outfit, there are myriad ways to get ahead in the game that are based on YOUR wits, not the wit of a machine. I personally refuse to see these people as my enemy or competitor, they are not worth my time. I pay for PLEX too, and use much more efficient methods than automating 6 accounts, only to pay for said accounts instead of buying fun ships and pewing with them.

Players already have formed their own anti-bot measures and this is how it should be. CCP doesnt have resources to constantly purge a game of a constantly adapting, reoccuring minor threat at the expense of taking care of some of the more major balancing issues the game has that are much more immenent. I wouldnt expect CCP to do much more than they already do - having an open ear to anyone who sees something, and dealing with it if they see it.

CPM0 Chairman / CSM7 Vice Secretary

non judgement
Without Fear
Flying Burning Ships Alliance
#39 - 2011-10-01 01:33:53 UTC
It isn't always easy to tell which characters are bots in games... most are obvious but not all.
I believe that the only real way to get rid of most bots is this way: Have a program that searches for them on your computer.

If a game as big as WOW does it, I don't see why CCP can't do something similar. Though this has been talked about in other threads. People get angry about another program on your computer that searches for bots. I personally don't see why its such a big deal. As long as it is only doing one thing and that process doesn't take much cpu/memory.

The bonus to this is that it doesn't waste CCPs time because there would be virtually no false positives.

The negative is that people who make bots, make money selling their bots. So of course they'll try to find a way around it, and continue making money from it. So CCP has to keep updating it, to take out the upgraded bots.

Anything computer related: if someone makes something there will be heaps of people who try to hack it. Kinect?
It isn't easy to stop it.
Wa'roun
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#40 - 2011-10-01 06:23:23 UTC
I think I once said some years ago that definite GM-known bots should be GM flagged for "world pvp" and let the populace have at them. You would see perhaps a black flag next to their name.

Have some balls like the devs of this MMOG I remember reading about years ago that is set in the Roman era (wonder if that is even around; don't remember the name). When a cheater was caught they nailed his avatar to a cross.
Previous page123Next page