These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

The Virgins of St. Junip

Author
Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#61 - 2011-09-29 18:36:16 UTC  |  Edited by: Andreus Ixiris
Kithrus wrote:
What would be surprising to me is that not a word leaves your mouth, pen and comm system without being stung into a Gallentean propagandized laden retort.


What utter bollocks. Commenting that a clearly slanted and nonsensical interpretation of a very clear, unambiguous statement was... well... a clearly slanted and nonsensical interpretation of a very clear, unambiguous statement is not "Gallentean", nor is it "propaganda".

It's stating a clear fact. At no point anywhere in Arkady's statements was any explicit statement or implication made that thieves, murderers, rapists and white-collar offenders are not considered criminals in the Republic. He merely stated that the Republic's concept of criminality differed vastly from the Empire's, and thus it was highly likely that preposterous thought-crimes such as "heresy", "blasphemy" and "apostaty" wouldn't be actionable in the Republic.

Kithrus wrote:
You could hear a group of Amarrians having a picnic lawn party for a wedding somewhere and you'd still have to get a word in on the edgewise that the brides dress wasn't made by a free person.


Unlikely. I have far better things to do with my time than watch Amarrians eat their bland and uninspired cuisine.

Et tu?

Kithrus wrote:
We get it, you don't like Amarrians. Point taken, frankly I like you even less then that but when the matari go have a party or the gallenteans go have a gala even I don't crash them with my mouth open and ears shut.


No, you bomb them from orbit and murder their children. Oh, and for your information, this is a public thread on a public forum, not a gala or a party. If you can't stand the heat, don't wave your virgin-seeking flesh missile around in the kitchen.

Incidentally, I'm Intaki, not Gallentean. Appropriate ethinic slurs include "back-again" (sometimes "backy" or "backer"), "rebackbirth", "vick", "naid" or "katter", although that last one is only appropriate (or inappropriate, depending on your perspective) for a woman.

Kithrus wrote:
I know when I'm not welcome


Amarrians don't even have a vague conception of where they're not welcome, let alone a knowledge of it.

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.

Kithrus
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#62 - 2011-09-30 03:52:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Kithrus
This has nothing to do with taking the heat this has to do with staying on topic on not putting some personal spin on the story because in your world its impossible to be caste within reason.

Its called self control and don't think the desire to help people is not within the Empire.

Again with propaganda you'd slam anything coming out of the Empire simply because it came out of the Empire.

That is what I'm taking exception to. You have no grasp in choosing your battles and no scene of the time and the place to do them. Forget about heat, you do your race, culture and faction little too no credit with your pointless accusations and sweeping person options as if they were fact.

I've known his Lordship for sometimes and your accusations ring so very hollow.

But, just to further illustrate my point the correct political move here do would be thus:

"Mr Merdaneth, given the recent illumination into how the Empire has been shown to treat its slaves we have questions regarding your ability to treat these people with respect. Mostly the concerns that so many ladies would be a temptation."

But then again I suppose all your capable of is wielding words like a wild blunt hammer instead of a fine cutting tool is a blessing really. The damage you deal to yourself and your cause makes me smile more then you think you annoy me.

Darkness is more then absence of light, it is ignorance and corruption. I will be the Bulwark from such things that you may live in the light. Pray so my arms do not grow weary and my footing remain sure.

If you are brave, join me in the dark.

Arkady Sadik
Gradient
Electus Matari
#63 - 2011-09-30 07:04:59 UTC
Kithrus wrote:
don't think the desire to help people is not within the Empire.
Quite a few people you submit to your desires would rather you didn't, though.

Quote:
"Mr Merdaneth, given the recent illumination into how the Empire has been shown to treat its slaves we have questions regarding your ability to treat these people with respect. Mostly the concerns that so many ladies would be a temptation."
I'm not sure if the "well-treatment" of slaves is the only or even the main problem (part of the reason why find slavery debates usually miss the point completely). Even if the Empire would ensure that all of their slaves would be "treated well", we still would want to free our people. And as for anti-slavery groups, I guess you could say that they do not believe that it is possible to treat a slave "well" for as long as they remain a slave.

The responses to this thread are, as far as I can see, either based on genuine upset about slavery happening at all and the realities of slavery, or based on some kind of amusement around the "old space captain on a ship of virgin girls" story that sounds more like the base of a Gallentean movie than an Amarrian human experiment, something I am sure Merdaneth was well aware of when he posted this thread and was playing to get a reaction on.

So:

Kithrus wrote:
the correct political move here do would be thus:
"Mr. Merdaneth, please release all your Minmatar slaves, it is unjust that you keep them"
"Mr. Merdaneth, please release all of your slaves, it is unjust that you keep them"
"Mr. Merdaneth, please stop trolling these forums"

I think that'd roughly be the points raised so far. Not that I think it'll achieve anything, hence my offer to support mutineering and escape, which is a somewhat more proactive version of (1) and (2).
Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#64 - 2011-09-30 07:47:39 UTC
Kithrus wrote:
This has nothing to do with taking the heat


If you post it on the IGS, it has everything to do with taking the heat. If you cannot wrap your head around that notion, then mark my words - you have absolutely no place here.

Kithrus wrote:
don't think the desire to help people is not within the Empire.


It's a testament to the nigh-infinite depravity of your culture when even the desire to help people has been twisted into the monstrosities you've inflicted upon countless millions.

Kithrus wrote:
Again with propaganda you'd slam anything coming out of the Empire simply because it came out of the Empire.


This is, with honest self-assessment, probably true - but can you blame me? Every chance the Empire has ever had to gain some shred of basic human decency it's pissed away. Even its most noble and selfless acts are bookended by awfulness.

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.

Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#65 - 2011-09-30 11:57:12 UTC
Arkady Sadik wrote:
Lyn Farel wrote:
Are you telling me thieves, murderers, rapists, or even white collars are not considered as criminals in the Republic ?
No, not really. I'm not quite sure how you got that idea, but I have a suspicion that my comment on crimes being not necessarily the same might have made you think that. So let me explain that remark.

When a holder forces a slave to have sex with him, the worst he has to fear in the Empire is a stern talking-to, though in general this seems not to be considered a crime. In the Republic, the same holder would be charged as a rapist. If said slave then kills said holder to prevent said sex, in the Empire the slave would likely be charged with murder (if the slave gets a trial at all, which is not necessarily the case), while in the Republic the worst he would have to fear would be a charge of manslaughter in self defence, with a more likely outcome a celebration as a hero.

So, while the crimes you mention seem rather clear-cut on paper, the terms are not really comparable in practice.

Not to mention that the situations in which we find ourselves when we rescue slaves are somewhat hectic if not chaotic and not quite the right place for questions regarding a possible criminal record or a full trial with judge, clan representation and spokespersons, so we have to skip that part. Personally, I would prefer a somewhat more orderly procedure, but the Amarr have been rather uncooperative in this regard.


I do not know why you are continuing to refer to the differences when I was mentionning the similarities, on which I agree. You are very good at derailing the core of subject when it annoys you.

So, of course murderers, rapists, thieves, etc, are considered criminals in the Republic, like in any empire. My point was purely about rhetorics : you offered to release slaves and help them to settle in the Republic if this is what they want. This being right or wrong was not what I underlined (but you keep seeing judgements of value on everything you seem to read), especially for the things you consider crimes (and most of them are considered as such by the Empire, they just lack regulations when it comes to punish Holders when the victims are powerless or of lower castes).

The point is simply that A LOT of slaves in the Empire are criminals, and a good majority of them are common criminals that you will find in any society : thieves, murderers, rapists, etc. You can ignore my questionning as long as it suits you, but it still remains a fact. Unless you forgot to mention something in your message, it was adressing all kinds of slaves under the imperial law, and so it includes by default the slaves I am refering to.

Your original message was :

Arkady Sadik wrote:
This seems like a good place to repeat this offer (especially as ship crew is usually more able to actually read public broadcasts):

We welcome slave ship crew to get into contact with one of our agents (or The Secret Stairway) in the Empire to arrange support for mutiny, extraction from the Empire, and participation in our Freedom Program. Our Freedom Program provides accomodation, food and education for as long as participants like to stay, with the goal of enabling them to integrate into the Minmatar society. We also provide contacts to clans who adopt refugees should the Amarr have eradicated your original clan.

Please note that this needs to be handled with utmost care, as the Amarr tend to get rather aggressive when others exercise their free will.


In conclusion, unless you want to add or clarify something, what I read in this message is a call to every kind of slave for uprising in exchange of your help for doing so. Unless you forgot something, you are actually also targeting common criminals that would be considered the same to the eyes of your own law.

Either it is gross generalization, or either it is voluntary and makes me wonder what is the political agenda behind.
Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#66 - 2011-09-30 12:05:06 UTC
After reading again my message, I want to make something clear : it is not my intention to slander you or your not so secret hidden stairway. It could actually be seen as constructive criticism, or I hope so. Maybe you could review a little the message of your offer to avoid all these misunderstandings ?
Arkady Sadik
Gradient
Electus Matari
#67 - 2011-09-30 12:45:43 UTC  |  Edited by: Arkady Sadik
Lyn Farel wrote:
The point is simply that A LOT of slaves in the Empire are criminals
I have been careful not to claim any kind of numbers or majorities here because I do not have them. Do you have any kind of statistics regarding how many of the slaves in the Empire are "non-Minmatar people whose crimes would be also considered crimes in the Republic"? I'd be very curious about those. So far, my impression has been that the vast majority of slaves in the Empire are not criminals (except under the definition used by some Amarrians on IGS who simply claim being non-believers and non-submissive as "crimes"), but rather hereditary.

Quote:
You can ignore my questionning as long as it suits you, but it still remains a fact. Unless you forgot to mention something in your message, it was adressing all kinds of slaves under the imperial law, and so it includes by default the slaves I am refering to.
I do not think I ignored your "questioning" - quite to the contrary, I think? Let me quote the passages from my posts:

We are quite happy to take "criminal" Minmatar back into the Republic as well.

Actual criminals who keep to their criminal ways in the Republic will be charged and get a trial according to Republic laws.

the situations in which we find ourselves when we rescue slaves are somewhat hectic if not chaotic and not quite the right place for questions regarding a possible criminal record or a full trial with judge, clan representation and spokespersons, so we have to skip that part. Personally, I would prefer a somewhat more orderly procedure, but the Amarr have been rather uncooperative in this regard.

I.e. yes, we also offer to take with us also people who have committed deeds that would be considered crimes in the Republic; if they commit crimes in the Republic, they will be charged and get a trial like anyone else; personally, I would not mind leaving non-Minmatar criminals in the Empire (their people, their problem), but the situations in which we find ourselves when we free such people do not really allow such distinctions to be made. I would be rather happy if the Republic and the Empire could negotiate a way to release all Minmatar to the Republic in a more orderly fashion, but the Empire so far has not been very cooperative here, and this somewhat suboptimal way seems to be the next best option.

If this does not clarify your questions, could you please rephrase them, as I am not sure I understood them?
Gottii
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#68 - 2011-09-30 13:10:15 UTC  |  Edited by: Gottii
Lyn Farel wrote:


The point is simply that A LOT of slaves in the Empire are criminals, and a good majority of them are common criminals that you will find in any society : thieves, murderers, rapists, etc. You can ignore my questionning as long as it suits you, but it still remains a fact. Unless you forgot to mention something in your message, it was adressing all kinds of slaves under the imperial law, and so it includes by default the slaves I am refering to.



This is utter and fanciful nonsense.

My civilization was enslaved, not for committing any crime, but merely for being there. Are you honestly telling me that your Empire is so broken and corrupt that it produces so many criminals that they outnumber a civilization's entire captive population?

If so, that is an indictment against your Empire.

But I do not trust your view of what a criminal is, for I do not trust your view of what is morally right and wrong. Your entire Empire is based upon the crimes of kidnapping, assault, and ****, among others.

Many of the best men and women I've ever met have been criminals in the eyes of the Empire.
Merdaneth
Angel Wing.
Khimi Harar
#69 - 2011-09-30 16:59:07 UTC
Gottii wrote:

This is utter and fanciful nonsense.

My civilization was enslaved, not for committing any crime, but merely for being there. Are you honestly telling me that your Empire is so broken and corrupt that it produces so many criminals that they outnumber a civilization's entire captive population?


Simple math would aid you here. I'll sum up a few points:

A. Most Matari were captured over 20 generations ago
B. All Matari that were enslaved for 9 or more generations have been released

Logic would dictate that most current slaves are not part of the 'my civilization' you mention. Those that can trace their ancestors back to those original slaves were likely re-enslaved for committing crimes like theft, murder or otherwise.

A large part of the Matari still present in the Amarr Empire are living there as free citizens. You may want to (re)claim them as well, but that would seem folly considering your position concerning reclaimings and treating people as property.

Stop living a millenium in the past and turn your eyes to the future for once.


Arkady Sadik
Gradient
Electus Matari
#70 - 2011-09-30 17:03:57 UTC  |  Edited by: Arkady Sadik
Merdaneth wrote:
Those that can trace their ancestors back to those original slaves were likely re-enslaved for committing crimes like theft, murder or otherwise.
You are conveniently forgetting that the Empire still occupied most of the Minmatar areas until 2-4 generations ago, and that your nation kept doing slave raids afterwards until this very day.

That is, you ignore logic to defend your nation's practices. The more I listen to you Amarr, the more I think you all live in denial, trying to ignore the reality of the barbaric nation you have created out of your faulty interpretations of your scriptures. You have created a nation that would crumble overnight if it was not for the slaves your made. You alone are nothing. It's a harsh truth, and it seems you all seem to try to ignore that little fact.

That, or you are trying to score cheap points on IGS by talking obvious bullshit.

Quote:
A large part of the Matari still present in the Amarr Empire are living there as free citizens. You may want to (re)claim them as well
Quite a few of them have returned to the Republic, so yes, we are. (I'm not sure about "a large part" there, but I assume that it's once again you just pulling numbers out of your ass for an argument.)
Merdaneth
Angel Wing.
Khimi Harar
#71 - 2011-09-30 17:11:38 UTC
Arkady Sadik wrote:
This seems like a good place to repeat this offer (especially as ship crew is usually more able to actually read public broadcasts):

We welcome slave ship crew to get into contact with one of our agents (or The Secret Stairway) in the Empire to arrange support for mutiny, extraction from the Empire, and participation in our Freedom Program. Our Freedom Program provides accomodation, food and education for as long as participants like to stay, with the goal of enabling them to integrate into the Minmatar society. We also provide contacts to clans who adopt refugees should the Amarr have eradicated your original clan.
.


Terrorist Sadik,

My issue with your position is simple:

I do not fault you for wanting to end slavery or free enslaved people. There are many Amarrians that have such desires too. It is perfectly acceptable position, in fact, the Empress alluded to desiring such a thing as well.

I do have an issue with your methods.

I respect Republic laws while I'm in the Republic, even if I don't agree with them. I don't raid the Republic for slaves, quite the opposite, I hunt those who raid the Republic for slaves. I am contributing to the Republic rule of law. I call upon Republic citizens to listen to the word of God, to let him into their hearts, to share the joy with their loved ones.

You however don't respect the laws of the Amarr Empire while in the Empire. You aid criminals, break the law and call upon others to do likewise. You invite Empire citizens to mutiny, you call for brother to turn upon brother in violence. You are trying to subvert and break the Empire rule of law.

That is why you are a terrorist and criminal, while I'm a law-abiding citizen, *even* in your Republic.

Merdaneth
Angel Wing.
Khimi Harar
#72 - 2011-09-30 17:15:36 UTC
Arkady Sadik wrote:
Merdaneth wrote:
Those that can trace their ancestors back to those original slaves were likely re-enslaved for committing crimes like theft, murder or otherwise.
You are conveniently forgetting that the Empire still occupied most of the Minmatar areas until 2-4 generations ago, and that your nation kept doing slave raids afterwards until this very day.


I'm not forgetting this at all. I'm simply applying logic.

Are you claiming that the Empire occupied the 'Minmatar areas' you mention for 10+ generations but never during that time enslaved the people living there in that time. Were many Matari effectively living free and non-enslaved during this occupation and then suddenly becoming slaves during the last 8 generations? I don't see any other explanation that would fit the facts, perhaps you can provide one?
Arkady Sadik
Gradient
Electus Matari
#73 - 2011-09-30 17:17:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Arkady Sadik
Merdaneth wrote:
I do have an issue with your methods.
Great. Have your Empress negotiate a sensible transfer of all Minmatar captives back to the Republic, or at least the permanent option for all of them to leave if they so desire, and we will stop our "methods" immediately.

You won't? Pity. Stop living a millenium in the past and turn your eyes to the future for once.
Nicoletta Mithra
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#74 - 2011-09-30 17:20:05 UTC
Lyn Farel wrote:
You are very good at derailing the core of subject when it annoys you.


I made the same observation. Adding the number of apparently willful 'misunderstandings' and the fact that conversely one misunderstanding (at least the only one that has been pointed out) on my part were directly leading to ceasing the discussion on his part, I just concluded that dialogue isn't what he seeks, quite contrary to his claims.
Unfortunate as it may be, trying to keep up a discussion when one side isn't really interested in that is kind of pointless and waste of energy: This waste of energy is also the openly declared goal of the man you try to debate with.
So I'd suggest not to try to reason with him.
Arkady Sadik
Gradient
Electus Matari
#75 - 2011-09-30 17:29:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Arkady Sadik
Merdaneth wrote:
Are you claiming that the Empire occupied the 'Minmatar areas' you mention for 10+ generations but never during that time enslaved the people living there in that time. Were many Matari effectively living free and non-enslaved during this occupation and then suddenly becoming slaves during the last 8 generations? I don't see any other explanation that would fit the facts, perhaps you can provide one?
*Arkady Sadik sighs*

You are assuming that the Minmatar were a single nation under occupation with no particular border conflicts there. This is a faulty assumption.

You are assuming that all Minmatar have had their lineage traced. That is a faulty assumption.

You are implying that the majority of the Empire's slave population consisted of less than 700 million slaves,[1] the rest are all criminals. That is a rather ridiculous claim.

Assuming a 1:1 relationship between criminal and non-criminal Minmatar slaves - which is highly unlikely - you also just claimed that the whole Minmatar population consists of 4.2 billion people, another ridiculous claim.

Basically, you are ignoring everything that speaks against your ideas, you focus on the details that favor them, apply some semi-accurate logic, and present the results as facts, without having any kind of numbers to back your argument with.

That is, you are talking out of your ass. As usual.

That said, I don't think we particularly care what excuse you put forth to explain why you keep Minmatar enslaved. We take them all back.
Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#76 - 2011-10-02 12:55:13 UTC  |  Edited by: Lyn Farel
Arkady Sadik wrote:


We are quite happy to take "criminal" Minmatar back into the Republic as well.

Actual criminals who keep to their criminal ways in the Republic will be charged and get a trial according to Republic laws.


Thank you for the clarification.

Now then, even for Minmatar that came in the Empire, as free Minmatar citizens, and did such crimes ? I highly doubt that any other governement would agree on letting go foreigners faulty of crimes on their territory, and here I am talking about crimes on which everyone agree on. Of course, you can ask for their extradition, like it is usually the case in these matters.

But considering the situations you are in when offering this to Minmatar slaves, I can understand the rush. Though, I am very, very doubful when it comes to the sanctions you will yourself inflict to the criminal that everyone agree on. Why would they tell you what they did, unless they have some weird sense of honor and justice and a lack of sense for self preservation ? You are favoring a majority over minorities. In short, what you are telling me is that you are not doing omelettes without breaking eggs. This is legitimate, it may still be a positive result in terms of numbers, but also definitly stained deeds.

And, like you, I would be interested in actual surveys and numbers on this.


Gottii wrote:


This is utter and fanciful nonsense.

My civilization was enslaved, not for committing any crime, but merely for being there. Are you honestly telling me that your Empire is so broken and corrupt that it produces so many criminals that they outnumber a civilization's entire captive population?

If so, that is an indictment against your Empire.

But I do not trust your view of what a criminal is, for I do not trust your view of what is morally right and wrong. Your entire Empire is based upon the crimes of kidnapping, assault, and ****, among others.

Many of the best men and women I've ever met have been criminals in the eyes of the Empire.


Whose Empire ? You did not read the whole discussion, isn't it ? If that can makes things easier for you, just consider me as an ideological mercenary, even if I despise this designation, and definitly not a partisan. Not amarrian, at least.

Then, that said :

- I never said that criminals (especially true criminals) were more numerous than other kinds of slaves. But I also called them a majority, which may imply it, and I must apologize for that misleading statement : it was not what I meant to say.

- If you really knew me, and actually read me, you would see that I make very few judgements of value, and even less judgements about right and wrong (unlike you, biased, governed and maybe also consumed by your emotions, but as I do not know you very well yet, I must say this with a whole spoon of salt).

- The Empire is not based upon what you said. These elements are a part of its culture, sometimes deeply ingrained in its roots, but are mere tools and ideological deviances. The primary purpose of the Empire is knowledge, something that a lot of people (including Amarrians) seem to have forgotten.


Nicoletta Mithra wrote:
Lyn Farel wrote:
You are very good at derailing the core of subject when it annoys you.


I made the same observation. Adding the number of apparently willful 'misunderstandings' and the fact that conversely one misunderstanding (at least the only one that has been pointed out) on my part were directly leading to ceasing the discussion on his part, I just concluded that dialogue isn't what he seeks, quite contrary to his claims.
Unfortunate as it may be, trying to keep up a discussion when one side isn't really interested in that is kind of pointless and waste of energy: This waste of energy is also the openly declared goal of the man you try to debate with.
So I'd suggest not to try to reason with him.


Yes, but who said he was the primary or only target audience ?
Mebrithiel Ju'wien
Anshar Incorporated
#77 - 2011-10-03 03:13:30 UTC
Rek Jaiga wrote:
Nicoletta Mithra wrote:

As to Rek:
Rek Jaiga wrote:
To create new life is to physically emulate the Creator...it is surely a sacred act!

It certainly is and thus should be treated with the respect and dignity that a sacred act affords. Also, to say that sex is equal to the act of creating new life is a bit awry given the realities of how sex is practiced nowadays: The act of pious chastity is exactly that which is bringing the act of procreation back into the sacred realm, as it means treating it not as a mere means to release stress and pass-time activity.
Also, as the careful reader might have noticed, the chastity is only for the period of service.


So long as the act is done in honest love, it's always good. Of course, that agrees with the condition of not being "a mere means to release stress and pass-time activity".

And good point, I hadn't noticed the conditions were such that it was only for the period of service. Even so, I do question the efficiency of having a crew who have never experienced the passion of a romantic relationship. Surely the thought of keeping one's husband/wife/significant other/family safe is a superior motivator than mere nationalism.

Or perhaps I'm being the hopeless romantic again. Sue me.


What the Delve-driven horrors is going on here?!

Firstly, Rek, you're being more than hopeless - you're being pathetic.

And secondly, dear gods has this discussion had me between fits of laughter (mostly Andreus) and disbelief (mostly... the rest).

Teenage girls on a ship for long periods of time? Puh-lease! I didn't last at my all-girls school for long before suggestion got the better of me!

And training for PMS?! You have no idea. The hells of Delve have no fury...

I'm with Andreus on this. Inbetween his wit, he's managed to collect a large group of nay-sayers to stand an all too hasty defence of, what I can only imagine, a stereotypically chauvinistic Amarrian view on female slaves. Thankfully, I can't view the promotional poster, but after the descriptions, I think I'd just sniff derisively.

Now, I'd say I'm not one for collectively Amarr bashing... well, not in a long time, but there are some people whose acts stand, at least in a noble end. Archbishop is a prime example. Even Rodj and Graelyn cut a noble silhouette. But this smacks of a disconnection with PR in reality and subsequent damage control.

Besides, have you asked these slaves whether they'd prefer said education to say... oooh I dunno... freedom, liberty and sex?

You should try the latter some time - it's a great release of stress!
Rek Jaiga
Teraa Matar
#78 - 2011-10-03 04:04:22 UTC
Mebrithiel Ju'wien wrote:


What the Delve-driven horrors is going on here?!

Firstly, Rek, you're being more than hopeless - you're being pathetic.



On what basis do you claim this? Or shall I call you something and then not bother addressing it at all as well?
Mebrithiel Ju'wien
Anshar Incorporated
#79 - 2011-10-03 04:16:22 UTC
Rek Jaiga wrote:
Mebrithiel Ju'wien wrote:


What the Delve-driven horrors is going on here?!

Firstly, Rek, you're being more than hopeless - you're being pathetic.



On what basis do you claim this? Or shall I call you something and then not bother addressing it at all as well?


Sorry, that sounded harsher than I intended. What I meant was that it's pathetic that you're being a hopeless romantic. Don't let a deluded, stuffy Amarrian with ultra-conservative beliefs make you feel you need to justify yourself.

All sex, with good intention, is good natured.
Rek Jaiga
Teraa Matar
#80 - 2011-10-03 05:24:52 UTC
Mebrithiel Ju'wien wrote:

Sorry, that sounded harsher than I intended. What I meant was that it's pathetic that you're being a hopeless romantic. Don't let a deluded, stuffy Amarrian with ultra-conservative beliefs make you feel you need to justify yourself.

Ah, I see. Apologies if I in turn seemed overly defensive.

Mebrithiel Ju'wien wrote:


All sex, with good intention, is good natured.


Yes.