These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Market Discussions

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

As if inlation wasn't already bad enough now: OTEC: Organization of Technetium Exporting

First post
Author
Akrasjel Lanate
Immemorial Coalescence Administration
Immemorial Coalescence
#21 - 2012-04-24 07:59:34 UTC
Its not inflation thats driving the prices up. People are ignorant. Straight

CEO of Lanate Industries

Citizen of Solitude

Degren
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#22 - 2012-04-24 08:04:54 UTC
So is this actually happening?

If not, please make it.

Hello, hello again.

Rico Minali
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#23 - 2012-04-24 08:12:29 UTC
Eve sandbox working as intended. Player content is player driven, player controlled and should stay that way. Dont like it? Form a powerful force and take it for yourself, thats how it happened in the first place.

Trust me, I almost know what I'm doing.

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#24 - 2012-04-24 08:22:34 UTC
Endeavour Starfleet wrote:
Don't know how many times it has been said that Incursions aren't flooding the market with isk, despite the many lies said on that subject.
…except that they're doing exactly that, and that no-one with any sense or insight into the matter has said otherwise.

Just because it's not the largest faucet doesn't mean it's not flooding the market.
Endeavour Starfleet
#25 - 2012-04-24 08:41:51 UTC  |  Edited by: Endeavour Starfleet
Tippia wrote:
Endeavour Starfleet wrote:
Don't know how many times it has been said that Incursions aren't flooding the market with isk, despite the many lies said on that subject.
…except that they're doing exactly that, and that no-one with any sense or insight into the matter has said otherwise.

Just because it's not the largest faucet doesn't mean it's not flooding the market.


Not flooding the market. CCP has pointed out how little they generate while nullsec posted lies about overwhelming incursion income taking over the game.

Nope it's about punishing those who dare not go into the endless moon goo CTAs or sit in afk cloak infested systems. Incursions are providing an alternative until CCP can get that festering pile of dog crap fixed and that makes it the enemy.

So instead of this crap calling itself fixes for incursions (Which do nothing that needs to be done for them as usual) how about CCP takes some time to fix the real issues before there really is an OTEC effort that isn't price trolling.
DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
#26 - 2012-04-24 19:48:28 UTC
Well way things are going the only materials untouched will be nano ribbons with the Escalation of inflation which is causing a Market Inferno... http://www.evenews24.com/2012/04/24/leak-goonswarm-federation-ceo-update-goonswarm-unbound/
An' then Chicken@little.com, he come scramblin outta the    Terminal room screaming "The system's crashing! The system's    crashing!" -Uncle RAMus, 'Tales for Cyberpsychotic Children'
Alexandra Alt
Doomheim
#27 - 2012-04-24 20:09:14 UTC
What part hasn't ppl understood that all this inflation and most of goonswarm action have the sole purpose to inflate everything in eve so that ppl swimming in loads of isk are forced to spend it and remove billions from the game?

I don't doubt this is somewhat conluded with CCP itself (or certain CCP members), in a few months when plenty of ISK leaves the game things will get back to normal...
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#28 - 2012-04-24 20:36:52 UTC
Alexandra Alt wrote:
What part hasn't ppl understood that all this inflation and most of goonswarm action have the sole purpose to inflate everything in eve so that ppl swimming in loads of isk are forced to spend it and remove billions from the game?

I don't doubt this is somewhat conluded with CCP itself (or certain CCP members), in a few months when plenty of ISK leaves the game things will get back to normal...

So you were implying that buying tech removes isk?

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#29 - 2012-04-24 20:55:11 UTC
Endeavour Starfleet wrote:
Not flooding the market. CCP has pointed out how little they generate while nullsec posted lies about overwhelming incursion income taking over the game.
…and they they were (and still are) flooding the market. Being the third largest faucet kind of disqualifies it from being described as “little”.

Quote:
So instead of this crap calling itself fixes for incursions (Which do nothing that needs to be done for them as usual)
Agreed. Incursions need to pay out pretty much no ISK at all and have a completely different reward structure altogether.
XIRUSPHERE
In Bacon We Trust
#30 - 2012-04-24 22:36:50 UTC
Why is this a bad thing? It adds to the overall landscape of the game, without the actors playing out some great space drama you would simply not have an EVE. If you don't like it do something about it.

The advantage of a bad memory is that one can enjoy the same good things for the first time several times.

One will rarely err if extreme actions be ascribed to vanity, ordinary actions to habit, and mean actions to fear.

CCP Phantom
C C P
C C P Alliance
#31 - 2012-04-24 22:59:48 UTC
Moved from General Discussion.

CCP Phantom - Senior Community Developer

Anya Ohaya
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#32 - 2012-04-24 23:11:51 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Endeavour Starfleet wrote:
Not flooding the market. CCP has pointed out how little they generate while nullsec posted lies about overwhelming incursion income taking over the game.
…and they they were (and still are) flooding the market. Being the third largest faucet kind of disqualifies it from being described as “little”.


I love it how you can stick to your guns even after they've backfired in your face.

Incursions might be a problem in terms of effort & risk versus reward, but they clearly aren't the sky-is-falling problem for the economy that some people liked to make them out to be.
Traumatica
Perkone
Caldari State
#33 - 2012-04-24 23:43:27 UTC
Endeavour Starfleet wrote:
Well this is what happens when you have game mechanics that so heavily favor the big alliances that they can afford to use what was supposed to be small corp tactics (Such as AFK Cloaking) to drive out small neuts and reds from the good stuff.

Corp and POS mechanics make isolating potential spies difficult except for big alliances. CCP Tells us their plan for fixing that is a modified minecraft screenshot for something next year. Result? They feel free to demand full API

AFK Cloaking drives small corps and alliances out shuts down efforts to fund alliances against the big boys. We hear nothing on this.

Tech moons and moon mining in general have gotten EXTREMELY out of hand and are serving to help solidify large alliances even further with virtually free isk flow. This has the added bonus of reducing the power of the individual corp member because stuff he mines or rats means less to the group. Instead of a badly needed temp change to drops from rats across nullsec we get pretty pictures for something next year.

These and more should have been priority for Inferno. And with Dust going to take up tons of their dev time why should the goons and others not feel safe to form a trust to raise prices?

CCP this is what nullsec has done to you. They pointed and screamed at incursions when the issues festering in their zone need to be fixed FAR more.


Yes surely it is because of cloaks that small groups do not have Tech moons and not because of our bigger-than-your-alliance capital fleets and 4x bigger-than-your-alliance subcapital fleets.
corestwo
Goonfleet Investment Banking
#34 - 2012-04-25 01:23:42 UTC
you realize that even when ccp has moved 0.0 income entirely over to a personal model (ring mining et al) that your small alliance still won't be able to compete because unlike now (where afk cloakers actually have nothing to do with your inability to hold moons), those afk cloakers will have a disproportionately large effect on your alliance's ability to make money, right?

This post was crafted by a member of the GoonSwarm Federation Economic Cabal, the foremost authority on Eve: Online economics and gameplay.

fofofo

DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
#35 - 2012-04-25 04:13:39 UTC
Anya Ohaya wrote:
Tippia wrote:
Endeavour Starfleet wrote:
Not flooding the market. CCP has pointed out how little they generate while nullsec posted lies about overwhelming incursion income taking over the game.
…and they they were (and still are) flooding the market. Being the third largest faucet kind of disqualifies it from being described as “little”.


I love it how you can stick to your guns even after they've backfired in your face.

Incursions might be a problem in terms of effort & risk versus reward, but they clearly aren't the sky-is-falling problem for the economy that some people liked to make them out to be.


People been making Incursions the strawman arguement so that thier gameplay doesn't get nerfed for the past 6 months. After the Incursion nerf expect to still see HUGE inflation and peeps continually trying to blame Incursions. OTEC, Hulkageddon, the Drone alloy nerf: almost everything materials ( except nano ribbons ) wise is seeing a supply side drop.
An' then Chicken@little.com, he come scramblin outta the    Terminal room screaming "The system's crashing! The system's    crashing!" -Uncle RAMus, 'Tales for Cyberpsychotic Children'
Nylith Empyreal
Sutar Rein
#36 - 2012-04-25 04:32:43 UTC  |  Edited by: Nylith Empyreal
On a side view, if 0.0 is so stagnant to actually support such a mutual co-op'd marketplace without any disturbances of war to require conservative use of wealth, sov etc. might be out of wack mechanics wise if there is no desire of expansion. Unless we're finally at that point in natural stages of man to find a relative peace amongst nations.

Who's the more foolish the fool or the fool who replies to him?

Endeavour Starfleet
#37 - 2012-04-25 04:35:39 UTC  |  Edited by: Endeavour Starfleet
That is why AFK cloaking needs to be balanced. I would personally rather it be my idea of grid timing but even a simple timer would be better than what we have now

That, and "we" (Random Small Alliance or Corp) have to fight through these horrific settings calling themselves corp and POS permissions while bigger alliances just spend more to manage risk and demand full API to be part of the "cool club

These and more combine to make nullsec the steaming pile of dog crap it is today.


There are some simple urgent "band-aids" That can reduce the dog crap factor atleast for a short time

#1 Cloak timer based on inactivity. (Not changing direction is a good indicator after plenty of warning) Yes I know it is crap because the idiots will use macros but they can be reported in the meantime. Having to warp off grid and back is better but we need an urgent fix faster than a tough one on AFK cloakers atleast until a proper complete new system is in place

#2 Tech, and other focused moon harvested materials removed from said moons and added to the loot tables of all rats in EvE based on security level. This will raise hell and could crash a bit of the market but it works as a temporary solution until proper ring mining is put into place. This is NOT the same as drone alloys as moon mining is passive and not a profession outside of a few moon logistics users

#3 A quick and dirty "Stuff" module for items and ships combined that can be onlined and offlined by POS operator but belongs only to a single or small group of characters. I know this will at once make POS a bit OP yet vastly reduces the amount of roles and permissions given to random members. An alternative is a true fix allowing moveable sections inside current arrays with single member permissions but I suspect if they have to do that they mise well go on and make the full modular POS

In my opinion this will at once reduce the huge influence large alliances have over EVE. Goonswarm says they use moon goo to fund their SRF (Which I generally believe) I hope they and other large alliances will see these as a positive impact on the game that will create vast new opportunities for good fights especially once proper fixes are in place. And serve to enable their members to feel even more involved with the success of their alliance

In my opinion these changes will also cause a flood of new people into nullsec. I would then like to later see changes to enable more behind the lines fights (Fights not ganks that AFK-Cloaking is today). A great deal more nullsec-nullsec wormholes would see good fights all over the place.
Endeavour Starfleet
#38 - 2012-04-25 04:41:14 UTC
Nylith Empyreal wrote:
On a side view, if 0.0 is so stagnant to actually support such a mutual co-op'd marketplace without any disturbances of war to require conservative use of wealth, sov etc. might be out of wack mechanics wise if there is no desire of expansion. Unless we're finally at that point in natural stages of man to find a relative peace amongst nations.


When I saw my first non WH based wormhole I thought "Damnnnn this will wreck the current sov lines" however the low amount of said wormholes with too low mass limits has prevented real use of this.
corestwo
Goonfleet Investment Banking
#39 - 2012-04-25 04:49:46 UTC  |  Edited by: corestwo
And there's the "Well if you just balance afk cloaking..." argument.

I have a newsflash for you: They could remove afk cloaking and in these hypothetical scenarios where all income is derived from mining and ratting, you would still get absolutely wrecked, by the very same "afk cloakers" you whine so much about, because they would adapt and continue to use asymmetric warfare to terrorize your carebears.

This post was crafted by a member of the GoonSwarm Federation Economic Cabal, the foremost authority on Eve: Online economics and gameplay.

fofofo

Endeavour Starfleet
#40 - 2012-04-25 04:57:48 UTC  |  Edited by: Endeavour Starfleet
It is not just balancing cloaking tho. The AFK cloak is the other way large alliances could seriously hoard Tech and thus must be removed but removed by itself it will not have the decisive full effect needed here.

Need all 3 but Cloak balance with Goo to loot tables will have the most desired impact if 2 alone I had to pick.

BTW I have no doubt the cloakers will adapt. And by adapt I mean staying around instead of going to the movies. With these implemented I would look forward to be hunted by the active ones. Knowing I am being hunted by the neut in local instead of having the immersion broken wondering if the idiot is at school is something that is desired.