These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123Next page
 

Are miners about to become worth their weight in gold?

Author
T-B0NE
Doomheim
#21 - 2012-04-14 02:46:30 UTC
EVE Stig wrote:
they seem to fear ccp actually making their profession hard more than anything for all their cries of how leet they are youd think theyd WANT it harder
When a predator hungers it will naturally select the prey that requires the least expended energy for the most satisfaction in the kill, unless it has something to prove, or rabid.

“Death and destruction are necessary to the health of the world, and therefore as natural, and lovable, as birth and life. Only priests and born cowards moan and weep over dying. Brave men face it with approving nonchalance." - Ragnar Redbeard

Malamber
Venomous Cloud
#22 - 2012-04-14 02:46:53 UTC
Corina Jarr wrote:
Malamber wrote:
Corina Jarr wrote:

Problem with your math. An ounce of gold does not weigh an ounce..

Curious how much you think an ounce of gold actually weighs...

About 1.09 ounces.


Let me clarify...
An ounce of gold (for purposes of financial value) is almost always (if not always) measured in troy ounces, which are not identical to the commonly used ounce.

I admit to being a little tongue-in-cheek with my reply, and though I learned something new (that precious metals are weighed in troy ounces), this is still a different weight than an ounce =p
Corina Jarr
en Welle Shipping Inc.
#23 - 2012-04-14 02:50:21 UTC
Malamber wrote:
Corina Jarr wrote:
Malamber wrote:
Corina Jarr wrote:

Problem with your math. An ounce of gold does not weigh an ounce..

Curious how much you think an ounce of gold actually weighs...

About 1.09 ounces.


Let me clarify...
An ounce of gold (for purposes of financial value) is almost always (if not always) measured in troy ounces, which are not identical to the commonly used ounce.

I admit to being a little tongue-in-cheek with my reply, and though I learned something new (that precious metals are weighed in troy ounces), this is still a different weight than an ounce =p

Yes. However, it would change the value of the gold in you math. Which was sorta my point...


Even with the correction though, your point still stands that a miner will not be worth their weight in gold.
Dbars Grinding
Dark Venture Corporation
Kitchen Sinkhole
#24 - 2012-04-14 02:53:30 UTC
no, there is no rise in profit from mining if everything is rising in price.

I have more space likes than you. 

Malamber
Venomous Cloud
#25 - 2012-04-14 02:57:18 UTC
Dbars Grinding wrote:
no, there is no rise in profit from mining if everything is rising in price.

Though there's more demand for mining... my brain's too fuddled to work that through =p
Corina Jarr
en Welle Shipping Inc.
#26 - 2012-04-14 02:58:27 UTC
Dbars Grinding wrote:
no, there is no rise in profit from mining if everything is rising in price.

Oh there is plenty of profit rise. The price of manufactured items has not kept up with the rise in min prices. Lag behind by a few days (during the rapid rise a few weeks back, stopped caring a week ago).
Cipher Jones
The Thomas Edwards Taco Tuesday All Stars
#27 - 2012-04-14 03:00:58 UTC
EVE Stig wrote:
T-B0NE wrote:
EVE Stig wrote:
I have to agree. Gankers are the ironically the biggest risk averse carebears in EVE

Gankin no fun if you know you're probably gonna end up being the one that gets ganked, after all what do predators fear, bigger predators. Ugh


they seem to fear ccp actually making their profession hard more than anything for all their cries of how leet they are youd think theyd WANT it harder

arent they usually the first to scream HTFU?

Honestly the new changes are only for the boomerang exploit. Everything else is still working fine.

internet spaceships

are serious business sir.

and don't forget it

EVE Stig
Doomheim
#28 - 2012-04-14 03:53:09 UTC  |  Edited by: EVE Stig
non judgement wrote:
People can't have fun in a game unless they hold some kind of kill other players event. Even if they have to sink down to the sad level of shooting something that can't defend itself.

You'd think shooting fish in a barrel would get boring after a while. But no! 5 hulkageddons now.


Yeah well the ppl that run it supply the Hulks too.... so its not just fun for the gankers but proffitable for the organizers. If it WASNT it wouldnt continue

T-B0NE wrote:
EVE Stig wrote:
they seem to fear ccp actually making their profession hard more than anything for all their cries of how leet they are youd think theyd WANT it harder
When a predator hungers it will naturally select the prey that requires the least expended energy for the most satisfaction in the kill, unless it has something to prove, or rabid.


so they dont HTFU like theyre always screaming? lol

Cipher Jones wrote:

Honestly the new changes are only for the boomerang exploit. Everything else is still working fine.


Doesnt seem to stop the tears....

"Some say that he is actually dead, but the Grim Reaper is too afraid to tell him." "Some say he is the 3rd member of Daft Punk and he did the vocals of "Technologic" song. All we know is,he's called EVE Stig"!

Asuka Solo
I N E X T R E M I S
Tactical Narcotics Team
#29 - 2012-04-14 05:21:44 UTC
Masikari wrote:
Looking through the forums and trade-hub prices it's no lie that things are getting ridiculously expensive!

Even tho I have enjoyed ganking the odd miner, I'm starting to hope that this breed of player begin mining their little socks off to help the market with minerals. Also, getting rid of drone-poo will make minerals even rarer. And we have Hulkageddon to go yet.

I'm curious to know if the gank-bears are starting to maybe feel a glimmer of concern? Or if anyone is for that matter?

I'm kinda glad to be a WH dweller at this moment in time. The Drake is almost as expensive as the Raven was not too long ago!

Thoughts? Flames? Trolls? Go!


Kill less miners and you'll have cheaper pvp.

The more hulkageddons, ice interdiction and jihadding occurs, the more inflation you'll have to put up with.

So its your call really. Can you afford what your killboard is cooking?

Eve is about Capital ships, WiS, Boobs, PI and Isk!

Asuka Solo
I N E X T R E M I S
Tactical Narcotics Team
#30 - 2012-04-14 05:28:50 UTC
Dbars Grinding wrote:
no, there is no rise in profit from mining if everything is rising in price.


This.

The time spent mining remains the same. The value of what is mined changes, but the costs of processing it into stuff you use remains unchanged.

Thus the profit margins don't increase, but the poor pvpers have to fork out more isk for what he/she wants.

Most ships have all but doubled in price.

I think its genius actually.

Now if only a cruiser cost 300 mil and a hulk cost 30 mil or less......

Eve is about Capital ships, WiS, Boobs, PI and Isk!

Akrasjel Lanate
Immemorial Coalescence Administration
Immemorial Coalescence
#31 - 2012-04-14 09:09:04 UTC
Well they are able to earn a lot more ISK.

CEO of Lanate Industries

Citizen of Solitude

Geodeath
Fist of God
#32 - 2012-04-14 09:23:16 UTC
AFK Hauler wrote:
Masikari wrote:
Elzon1 wrote:
Miner clone = 200 kg


Shocked Dat's one heavy sonovvabee-atch!!



Not much moving around as the asteroid doesn't speed tank... yet.

Tends to add on the extra carbon to increase said worth.

I think roids can be reasonably successful mass tanking, but their dps could use a buff.
Masikari
State War Academy
Caldari State
#33 - 2012-04-14 09:48:36 UTC
EVE Stig wrote:
Aqriue wrote:
Masikari wrote:

Hmmmm... more expensive ships = MOAR tears when they get blown up. Why didn't I look at it that way? Think I will get back into my Thrasher Twisted

First step to admiting you have a problem. You are risk adverse, you fly in highsec which CONCORD is unbiasedly guarding you just as much as the hulk and Mack pilots (until you strike).

Good for you. Nothing like saying you won't risk something expensive, it just has to hit the wallet with the least amount of loss. Its ok the other guy is probably going to lose a Mack or Hulk, so long as its not you. Lets not forget "Don't fly what you cannot afford to lose" and "Poorly Designed ships" go great with "Destroyers got a buff, but mining vessels don't need them".


I have to agree. Gankers are the ironically the biggest risk averse carebears in EVE


Excellent - I have managed to extract tears and I haven't even got out of bed yet.

But in all seriousness, when I said I'd jump in my Thrasher why did you assume I meant ganking miners? That particular PvP alt is sat in Low-Sec. You two are so adorable!!
Masikari
State War Academy
Caldari State
#34 - 2012-04-14 09:51:02 UTC
Geodeath wrote:
AFK Hauler wrote:
Masikari wrote:
Elzon1 wrote:
Miner clone = 200 kg


Shocked Dat's one heavy sonovvabee-atch!!



Not much moving around as the asteroid doesn't speed tank... yet.

Tends to add on the extra carbon to increase said worth.

I think roids can be reasonably successful mass tanking, but their dps could use a buff.


Except the Roids with Mercoxit. The DPS for them is fine Blink
James Copper
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#35 - 2012-04-14 10:55:17 UTC
Seen it before, will see it again, a change that seems to offer us miners hope... til someone comes along and finds a new way to up the isk without taking us off the target list. And no, I don't scream when my miner gets blown up, I just hate the waste, like I did as a beginning miner when I got can-flipped. Yeah, sit there and can-flip me in your pvp cruiser, hoping I'll "steal" from you in my hauler or be dumb enough to bring a badly fitted cruiser out to claim my "kill rights." meanwhile a couple hours work sits in a can that will soon pop with no one to make use of it.

Well that was the early days, since then I've been to 0.0, run around with fleets, etc. I know now that the makers of EVE don't want a peaceful area anywhere, even markets are pvp. Perhaps this new update will do some good for the miners, perhaps the big corps and alliances will just lock down harder on "their" areas. We'll see. Each to their own, and as for the guy who started this thread, don't know you and won't comment on what I don't know, just a lot of folks out there (you may have shot them yourself) claiming hero status for downing unarmed ships :) Can't blame some for confusing gankers and pirates m8, clear skies to you!
Tobiaz
Spacerats
#36 - 2012-04-14 11:25:03 UTC
Karl Hobb wrote:
Malamber wrote:
Corina Jarr wrote:

Problem with your math. An ounce of gold does not weigh an ounce..

Curious how much you think an ounce of gold actually weighs...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troy_ounce


"The troy ounce (oz t) is a unit of imperial measure."

Well that explains why it doesn't make much sense. Lol

Operation WRITE DOWN ALL THE THINGS!!!  Check out the list at http://bit.ly/wdatt Collecting and compiling all fixes and ideas for EVE. Looking for more editors!

Masikari
State War Academy
Caldari State
#37 - 2012-04-14 11:27:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Masikari
James Copper wrote:
Seen it before, will see it again, a change that seems to offer us miners hope... til someone comes along and finds a new way to up the isk without taking us off the target list. And no, I don't scream when my miner gets blown up, I just hate the waste, like I did as a beginning miner when I got can-flipped. Yeah, sit there and can-flip me in your pvp cruiser, hoping I'll "steal" from you in my hauler or be dumb enough to bring a badly fitted cruiser out to claim my "kill rights." meanwhile a couple hours work sits in a can that will soon pop with no one to make use of it.

Well that was the early days, since then I've been to 0.0, run around with fleets, etc. I know now that the makers of EVE don't want a peaceful area anywhere, even markets are pvp. Perhaps this new update will do some good for the miners, perhaps the big corps and alliances will just lock down harder on "their" areas. We'll see. Each to their own, and as for the guy who started this thread, don't know you and won't comment on what I don't know, just a lot of folks out there (you may have shot them yourself) claiming hero status for downing unarmed ships :) Can't blame some for confusing gankers and pirates m8, clear skies to you!


Ah, someone who doesn't assume. I like you, sir.

OK, let me clarify my views on miners for the ones who are/do assume.

Until the other day, I've never ganked miners. I mean, what is the point? Industrial ships carrying good loot is worth ganking over - that I can understand. But miners? No. The loot is not worth it in my opinion. Even in our Merc Corp we tend not to bother with mining ships, unless we decide that they are too stupid to be allowed to mine while a war is going on. Plus I really don't like them on my killmails. They are just 'Meh'

Being mainly a Wormhole Corp, I have come across A LOT of mining ships in neighboring 'Holes... but I really don't bother with them. There's no fun in killing defenselessness ships unless you know they are carrying good lootz or are a war-target. However, if I see one in 'my' WH chipping away at 'my' Grav sites then I will look to attack. Afterall, the ship is in my dwelling. I'm sure even miners will agree that, in this instance, killing a mining vessel in 'my own' space is fair enough. So I don't count that as griefing.

I am, however, guilty of ganking one mining ship in HS the other day, which is what got me thinking about this making this post. But the reason for that was just to see what the hype was about. I found no buzz. I prob won't do it again. And even after it happened I PM'd the pilot and gave him the ISK back for his loss plus a great % more in compensation. Why? Well, he was ranting in local about unsubbing cos I had just killed everything he had and I really don't want anyone to unsub over losing a ship. Secondly, he turned out to be relatively new so I offered him this experience as a lesson-learnt-the-hard-way and wanted him to have a second chance. No, I wasn't telling him how he should be playing - I just took the time to explain how to be better at his current chosen game-style. So, looking at it from one point of view, I prob did him a favour by ganking his ship. 'Cos I bet if I passed him by, the next gank-bear wouldn't have done the above and possibly encouraged him to unsub when he whined in Local.

TL;DR - I'm not a gank-bear, unless one intrudes into my WH. However, I did it once to see what the buzz was about. I didn't like it and compensated the miner.

Additional: this thread has gone off track, lol

EDIT: Grammar!
Solhild
Doomheim
#38 - 2012-04-14 11:31:05 UTC
Tobiaz wrote:
Karl Hobb wrote:
Malamber wrote:
Corina Jarr wrote:

Problem with your math. An ounce of gold does not weigh an ounce..

Curious how much you think an ounce of gold actually weighs...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troy_ounce


"The troy ounce (oz t) is a unit of imperial measure."

Well that explains why it doesn't make much sense. Lol


Technically, we should be looking at the price of gold in New Eden for comparison.
gfldex
#39 - 2012-04-14 12:05:25 UTC  |  Edited by: gfldex
Masikari wrote:
Thoughts? Flames? Trolls? Go!


A miner with maxed out skills on two hulks and 1 orca, will fill that orca in about 40min. That's a little more then 7.11 cans. Maxed skilled hulk pilots are not much of a problem, takes only halve a year. The orca is a different problem because it needs quite a few skills in leadership. Prices may or may not keep going up depending on how good CCP is with nuking bots from orbit.

You can make the math yourself how valuable those 7.11 cans of highsec ore will become when you compare that income with a lvl4 mission runner with two or three accounts.

PLEX prices play a role as well. Mining scales quite well with accounts but you have to spend more time in a belt before you make any ISK if you PLEX with any miner you add. In the end PLEX define a baseline for the value of a can of ore. So you even have CCPs marketing meddling with ship prices.

There will be quite a few well skilled miners move to 0.0 when loot drops are nerfed. At least until CCP solves the compression problem. It is hard to predict but I strongly doubt that we see a bubble right now. There are simply to many reasons right now why mineral prices could go up.

If you take all the sand out of the box, only the cat poo will remain.

EVE Stig
Doomheim
#40 - 2012-04-14 12:26:21 UTC
Masikari wrote:
EVE Stig wrote:
Aqriue wrote:
Masikari wrote:

Hmmmm... more expensive ships = MOAR tears when they get blown up. Why didn't I look at it that way? Think I will get back into my Thrasher Twisted

First step to admiting you have a problem. You are risk adverse, you fly in highsec which CONCORD is unbiasedly guarding you just as much as the hulk and Mack pilots (until you strike).

Good for you. Nothing like saying you won't risk something expensive, it just has to hit the wallet with the least amount of loss. Its ok the other guy is probably going to lose a Mack or Hulk, so long as its not you. Lets not forget "Don't fly what you cannot afford to lose" and "Poorly Designed ships" go great with "Destroyers got a buff, but mining vessels don't need them".


I have to agree. Gankers are the ironically the biggest risk averse carebears in EVE


Excellent - I have managed to extract tears and I haven't even got out of bed yet.


What tears?
reality

your mentioning tears is me extracting your tears lol

qq moar buddy

"Some say that he is actually dead, but the Grim Reaper is too afraid to tell him." "Some say he is the 3rd member of Daft Punk and he did the vocals of "Technologic" song. All we know is,he's called EVE Stig"!

Previous page123Next page