These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

A logical sink?
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
The Apostle
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#1 - 2012-02-05 02:10:29 UTC
I've seen quite a bit of talk about sov bills forming a large part of why 0.0 alliances need cash. It's interesting in that to "own" some space you pay rent to NPC.

And yet, a highseccer can put up as many towers as he pleases and only has starbase charters ( a pittance if ever ) as an additional expense. I know at least one small corp with an excess of 7 towers up for R&D - there's no penalty to do so.

How hard would it be to introduce an escalating POS cost to sink some of the isk out of game?

How high would it have to be to be a worthwhile sink?

Nullsec democracy is an oxymoron. Bloc voting for alliance candidates is Democracy for Morons 101. Let them perish in their self-interest.

Bring back Eve. OUR Eve.
Implying Implications
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#2 - 2012-02-05 02:42:06 UTC
I think anyone in highsec should be forced to pay 10m isk/hour for the time they spend there. Time spent logged off will also count. CCP could make this acceptable by saying the money goes to CONCORD for protecting you.

hello
The Apostle
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#3 - 2012-02-05 02:57:48 UTC
Implying Implications wrote:
I think anyone in highsec should be forced to pay 10m isk/hour for the time they spend there. Time spent logged off will also count. CCP could make this acceptable by saying the money goes to CONCORD for protecting you.

lol. Worth a thought.

It'll do one of two things. Send everyone to 0.0 or make everyone go wtfnowayemoragequitnoyoucanthavemystuff!

Nullsec democracy is an oxymoron. Bloc voting for alliance candidates is Democracy for Morons 101. Let them perish in their self-interest.

Bring back Eve. OUR Eve.