These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

CCP can I and the other 10000+ accounts who voted

First post
Author
RougeOperator
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#121 - 2012-03-29 15:15:50 UTC
Ivana Twinkle wrote:
why would we want a revote? being back to a CCP sock puppet CSM is amusing too. :unsmith:



yeah cause the Neville Chamberlain crap mittens came back with during incarna gate was so him not being a sock puppet.....

Cute.

**Space wizards are real, they can make 10058 votes vanish. "and for a moment i hurd 10k goons cry out, then silence" **

Sverige Pahis
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#122 - 2012-03-29 16:12:41 UTC
RougeOperator wrote:
Ivana Twinkle wrote:
why would we want a revote? being back to a CCP sock puppet CSM is amusing too. :unsmith:



yeah cause the Neville Chamberlain crap mittens came back with during incarna gate was so him not being a sock puppet.....

Cute.



Tell you what buddy you learn how to spell then you come back to my fine thread and **** it up
Katja Faith
Doomheim
#123 - 2012-03-29 16:22:41 UTC
Serene Repose wrote:
Why? You didn't have to waste the vote like you did.


This.
Katja Faith
Doomheim
#124 - 2012-03-29 16:23:52 UTC
RougeOperator wrote:
yeah cause the Neville Chamberlain crap mittens came back with during incarna gate was so him not being a sock puppet.....



What?!?!?!!
My Neutral Toon
Doomheim
#125 - 2012-03-29 16:24:59 UTC
Heimatar Auctioneer wrote:
Aiden Andraste wrote:
10000 opinions have been silenced. CCP needs to fix it or just scrap the CSM.


Yes silenced by the complete incompetence of your own representative that you used your precious vote to vote with.

Stop crying like a baby and move on. You should be VASTLY CONTENT that he isn't banned permanently.



There are no ground to perma-ban

and its a STRETCH to even ban him in te first place.

Its an obvious damage control move b/c he embarrassed CCP in front of SONY and other potential investors. His ban was PURELY and 100% a CCP business decission to show SONY they arent soft.

...Can't. Tell. If ...Troll? Or Serious....

Butt Hurt about Harrasment? Read first GM post: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=88362&find=unread

Amity Lane
Lane Family Shell Corp
#126 - 2012-03-29 16:29:46 UTC  |  Edited by: Amity Lane
My Neutral Toon wrote:
Heimatar Auctioneer wrote:
Aiden Andraste wrote:
10000 opinions have been silenced. CCP needs to fix it or just scrap the CSM.


Yes silenced by the complete incompetence of your own representative that you used your precious vote to vote with.

Stop crying like a baby and move on. You should be VASTLY CONTENT that he isn't banned permanently.



There are no ground to perma-ban

and its a STRETCH to even ban him in te first place.

Its an obvious damage control move b/c he embarrassed CCP in front of SONY and other potential investors. His ban was PURELY and 100% a CCP business decission to show SONY they arent soft.

And? Sounds like a pretty shrewd business move to me. CCP is in this to make money, not friends.

Edit: Not saying that I agree with it personally, just that it makes sense from CCP's business standpoint.
Twulf
Order of the Eagles
#127 - 2012-03-29 16:58:16 UTC
Why should you get your vote back? Your choice turned the job down, CCP did not force him to leave it.

You voted, your choice turned down the spot. Too bad, so sad. Welcome to Politics.

XxTiggerxX
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#128 - 2012-03-29 16:58:59 UTC
Amity Lane wrote:
You voted for somebody.

They won that election.

They did something that got themselves removed from office.

You don't just get a do-over because your candidate messed up. Perhaps you should've researched your candidate more closely prior to voting.

If anything, your anger should be directed at your candidate, not CCP or "pubbies" or whatever scapegoat you choose. He's the one who effectively wasted your votes through his actions.


Listen to the lady.





To sum it up for the average Goon:
HTFU
Spy 21
Infidelia Black
#129 - 2012-03-29 16:59:35 UTC
I want the old GSF back please.

You know the one that for years has effectively and unceasingly ridiculed people who whined in the forums about stuff not being fair?

The one that stuck it up BOBs *ss, broke it off and then publicly and with no sympathy whatever laughed at them over it? You know... that goonswarm...

You guys may have been hated in the past but there was never any question as to whether or not you were respected.

What's happened to you guys?

Obfuscation for the WIN on page 3...

Iosue
Black Sky Hipsters
#130 - 2012-03-29 17:09:07 UTC
nah, just don't vote for someone that will get themselves banned next time.
Glarealot
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#131 - 2012-03-29 23:11:12 UTC
Kalathia Eginald wrote:
If there are as I have read 300000 active accounts 10000 is around 3.3% of the total payersabase, which in the end is a drop in the ocean numbers wise. It was approximately 20% of the total votes cast.


Then start taking into account how many are alts, considering it was the goons who were shouting "I have 5 accounts!" and "I have 6 accounts" when the numbers came out that 66% of toons over 5 mil SP are in highsec. Suddenly, that's a lot less individual players voting him in...

.

Kalathia Eginald
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#132 - 2012-03-29 23:19:22 UTC
Glarealot wrote:
Kalathia Eginald wrote:
If there are as I have read 300000 active accounts 10000 is around 3.3% of the total payersabase, which in the end is a drop in the ocean numbers wise. It was approximately 20% of the total votes cast.


Then start taking into account how many are alts, considering it was the goons who were shouting "I have 5 accounts!" and "I have 6 accounts" when the numbers came out that 66% of toons over 5 mil SP are in highsec. Suddenly, that's a lot less individual players voting him in...


That maybe true, but without full numbers, and I doubt they would do that, I can only base my rough figures on what information is available. The only way to be sure is if CCP released numbers of people with active accounts as opposed to the number of active accounts. That however would take their numbers down and no company will do that.

In either regard it is not exaclty a majorit mandate let alone a landslide. Put incontext the lice with it comments using numbers sort of look a lot less impressive.
Callous Jade
Dockturnal Bromance
#133 - 2012-03-29 23:32:32 UTC
Sverige Pahis wrote:
have our votes back please tia






No but you have all your self entitled whining back. Its noones fault but your own that you threw your vote away on a candidate that didnt take his position seriously enough.

~Deal with it~

Ai Mei
Starfish Operating Syndicate
#134 - 2012-03-29 23:46:48 UTC
even if all 10000 + votes were from 10,000 people that still makes up less than 3% of the total eve online accounts.

But since those 10,000 were all people with multiple accounts and what not a safe assumption is that around 6,000 people are mad. Which brings the overall percentage of u mad bro down to less than 2%


#occupymittani the other 98% of eve dont give a flying **** of his banning or not, we will adapt and move on and goons just need to find another ceo for a month. but most likely they will forget to pay the sov bill again and disban for the 4th time.
Eezee Gonozal
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#135 - 2012-03-29 23:59:36 UTC
I don't even particularly care tbh.

Besides liking spacedongues too much, there's still a good amount of people on the CSM (probably everyone besides 2 mentallyretarded candidates, that won't have any influence anyway) that will actually do something good.

Unlike most pubbies I actually still think this is a game and don't get mad over ingame drama *gasp*. Unless CCP gets anallyraped by Sony and destroys Eve by forbidding ganking and controlling general ingame behaviour to cater to whiny idiots like Issler, I will still have fun in this game.