These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

I need to know whether this breaks the Eula regarding Occupy Jita
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Ashley SchmidtVonGoldberg
Doomheim
#1 - 2012-03-29 19:58:47 UTC
Im currently training up three seperate characters on a new account for suicide Arti Thrashers and i intend to sit in Jita when the Goons strike and pop there clones after they have ganked. ill have lots of dessies in an Orca in a safe spot with a cloak and unload them as i need them.

Is this acceptable and not in any way alt recycling. I just need a confirmation.


Thanks for the help.

Standing in for Karn Dulake who was banned for saying bad words
Lapine Davion
Outer Ring Applied Logistics
#2 - 2012-03-29 20:01:02 UTC
Iskies for your toonies to buy dessies for your mommies.

[b]Don't worry about posting with your main!  Post with your brain! "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."[/b]
Ammzi
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
#3 - 2012-03-29 20:01:24 UTC
Meh, ganking empty goon clones that will just be in Jita anyway.
You are just making them go dock quicker.
Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
#4 - 2012-03-29 20:03:12 UTC
You gonna' have fun trying to lock-and-pod before they get away. But it's totally not against the rules.





☼

There's a million angry citizens looking down their tubes..at me.
Corina Jarr
en Welle Shipping Inc.
#5 - 2012-03-29 20:04:15 UTC
Nothing rule breaking as far as I can tell.

Have fun.
Vertisce Soritenshi
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#6 - 2012-03-29 20:05:09 UTC
Ashley SchmidtVonGoldberg wrote:
Im currently training up three seperate characters on a new account for suicide Arti Thrashers and i intend to sit in Jita when the Goons strike and pop there clones after they have ganked. ill have lots of dessies in an Orca in a safe spot with a cloak and unload them as i need them.

Is this acceptable and not in any way alt recycling. I just need a confirmation.


Thanks for the help.


Fast track to piracy eh? I hope you realise that podding in high sec is a big hit on your sec status.

Bounties for all! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2279821#post2279821
Pok Nibin
Doomheim
#7 - 2012-03-29 20:05:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Pok Nibin
Let Doc Pok address this one. If they're dumb enough to telegraph their moves, it's okay for you to strategically take advantage of their blunder. One might consider what was mentioned before, in the spirit of McArthur - hit 'em where they ain't - they told you where they WILL be...kinda leaves their backdoor wide open, don't it?

The right to free speech doesn't automatically carry with it the right to be taken seriously.
Graic Gabtar
The Lemon Party
#8 - 2012-03-29 20:06:14 UTC
The only thing unacceptable is that mo you are sporting IMHO. Blink
Deamos
Hideaway Hunters
The Hideaway.
#9 - 2012-03-29 20:10:30 UTC
Nothing like this is considered against the EULA unless it is adverse to Eve as a whole. A single incident of mass High sec griefing is nothing. An extended period is probably against the EULA though.
gfldex
#10 - 2012-03-29 20:10:38 UTC
Ammzi wrote:
Meh, ganking empty goon clones that will just be in Jita anyway.


CCP always wanted to do something with corpses.

If you take all the sand out of the box, only the cat poo will remain.
Lapine Davion
Outer Ring Applied Logistics
#11 - 2012-03-29 20:12:04 UTC
Deamos wrote:
Nothing like this is considered against the EULA unless it is adverse to Eve as a whole. A single incident of mass High sec griefing is nothing. An extended period is probably against the EULA though.


nope.avi

[b]Don't worry about posting with your main!  Post with your brain! "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."[/b]
Deamos
Hideaway Hunters
The Hideaway.
#12 - 2012-03-29 20:18:27 UTC  |  Edited by: Deamos
Lapine Davion wrote:
Deamos wrote:
Nothing like this is considered against the EULA unless it is adverse to Eve as a whole. A single incident of mass High sec griefing is nothing. An extended period is probably against the EULA though.


nope.avi


Yup

I'm not saying its absolute. But the when High Sec becomes a massive killing field, it more than likely considered exploiting game mechanics.

Edit: I know you were not around back then since you are only a 2011 player, but before trying to respond, do your homework.
Akiro Tukana
Heavy Metal Industrial Supply
#13 - 2012-03-29 20:26:44 UTC
The Yulai incident resulted in bannings only due to 2 factors. First, they took advantage of a game mechanic (remote reps not being flagged to concord), and secondly, failed to cease when notified to do so by a GM. The first was not the reason for the ban, the second was.

Forgive me if my memory is a little off on this......
Deamos
Hideaway Hunters
The Hideaway.
#14 - 2012-03-29 20:35:49 UTC
Akiro Tukana wrote:
The Yulai incident resulted in bannings only due to 2 factors. First, they took advantage of a game mechanic (remote reps not being flagged to concord), and secondly, failed to cease when notified to do so by a GM. The first was not the reason for the ban, the second was.

Forgive me if my memory is a little off on this......


Yep and that is why I said it's a maybe/possibility at this point. Massive high sec suicides for an extended period of time can be possibly considered exploiting a game mechanic. As for failing to cease after being ask to, we shall see.

Not saying its going to happen or not, just saying it can.