These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Ships & Modules

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Titan changes - update

First post First post First post
Author
Magnifikus Erzverwirrer
Sniggerdly
Pandemic Legion
#161 - 2012-03-27 18:18:20 UTC
XxTheKmanxX wrote:
still think that titans shouldn't be able to hit subcaps.. or if they are even able to too the biggest they can hit is a battleship that is at 0 speed and transversal with 100 TP's on it


you know about stacking penalty of tps right?

one goon more that farts about game mechanics he dont even understand :D

really you are mwding with battleships (blown up to carrier signatur radius) away from titans and wonder why they hit you, your so terribad at eve
EnderCapitalG
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#162 - 2012-03-27 18:19:53 UTC
Kaj'Schak wrote:
No.


Cost is not a balancing tool, at all.
Kun'mi
Thunderwaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#163 - 2012-03-27 18:20:17 UTC  |  Edited by: Kun'mi
Kaj'Schak wrote:

Titans can only inflict their dread-compareable DPS at relativly short ranges (+ Doomsday all 10 Minutes).


50 tracking titans are not vulnerable to anything they'd be fielded against.

No subcap fleet could take out any of them (except for situations where their pilots make mistakes, such as last weekend) and they are not brought onto the field when there is a threat from an equal sized tank-fitted titan fleet.

Even if they were dropped by a titan fleet of equal size, there is nothing stopping them from simply refitting.
Dungar's Sister
Never Ignorant Gettin' Goals Accomplished
Gimme Da Loot
#164 - 2012-03-27 18:20:18 UTC
Kaj'Schak wrote:
There is also the question, if you field 50 Ships worth 70b each, you should be somehow able to vaporize an enemy fleet, that has only the value of one or two of these ships

.

So a handful of battleships should never be beaten by 50 frigates?
Kyle Myr
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#165 - 2012-03-27 18:21:47 UTC
EnderCapitalG wrote:
... discussion of missile volleys...
Incorrect. Its volley at full is 153k. Its volley at half (with 3x TP and 2x web in a "perfect" situation) is half that. Our Maelstrom fitting is approx 118k EHP, so even in this "perfect" situation, it still does not one-volley a Maelstrom.


This is the point I was getting at.

Essentially, the current state of 0.0 sub capital combat, given the role of logistics ships, works a fair bit around the concept of killing a ship in a single volley before reps are received. I won't go into detail about our fleet doctrine, but it uses a lot of support and ships with the ability to coordinate a high alpha strike on a single target which they are able to track to do this quite well. It's far from immune to counters, capital and sub capital, but the issue at hand is how a super capital fleet functions versus sub capital fleets, so I'll use this as the example.

Pre-Crucible, Titans were able to use their Doomsdays to directly and immediately remove critical support roles from this fleet, or any other fleet. In order, these were generally the fleet commander, any command ships, and hictors/dictors capable of tackling Titans, and any logistics ships capable of keeping the fleet alive. They did this in a single shot, so no amount of support could prevent it. They required no support to do this.

Post-Crucible, Titans are doing the exact same run down of critical targets, only they're using the fact their guns are perfectly capable of hitting any sized target given its angular velocity relative to a crowd of 20+ titans requires no support to hit with a shot that will kill it in a single volley. Titans were doing this pre-Crucible in low sec where they couldn't use doomsdays (see the end of the much celebrated first CCP fleet, a fun event for everyone). Given their immunity to friendly electronic warfare, this isn't due to support fleets. Looking at killmails, these targets are not target painted or webbed. They are simply being killed in single volleys. There is still no support fleet necessary.

The reason Leviathans are mentioned is because missile damage is not effective in this type of strategy, as the flight time of missiles means coordinating a volley does not work. Furthermore, the single volley damage from singular Leviathans is not killing sub capitals because it is actually mitigated by the missile damage formula.

As it stands, even assuming maximum target painting and webbing (which implies the necessity of a support fleet for Titans to function), Leviathans were never useful for this type of combat.

tl;dr:

-Single volley kills by turrets is what is dangerous
-Titans do this without support while having 30m+ EHP
-Missiles don't do this without support, or even with it.
Styrling
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#166 - 2012-03-27 18:22:11 UTC
Kaj'Schak wrote:
There is also the question, if you field 50 Ships worth 70b each, you should be somehow able to vaporize an enemy fleet, that has only the value of one or two of these ships


50 bombers can take 100000 Battleships to the ownzone.

**** you and **** balancing this game on Isk.
Calmoto
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#167 - 2012-03-27 18:23:21 UTC
Kaj'Schak wrote:
There is also the question, if you field 50 Ships worth 70b each, you should be somehow able to vaporize an enemy fleet, that has only the value of one or two of these ships

Battles which are effected by these masses of titans are between entities, which both can afford to lose dozens of these.

Ranges:
Titans can only inflict their dread-compareable DPS at relativly short ranges (+ Doomsday all 10 Minutes).
Motherships can inflict their fighterbomber dps at over 200km where titans won't hit them at all (except DDs)

DPS/Tank:
Titans that are fitted for rapes, are not fitted to max tank. So they are realativly vuernable
Motherships can always carry their nearly titan tank and to unleash their imense DPS


Signature:
Titans **** these Drakes and Maelstroms because they have a huge signature. Shieldtanks (Maels/Drakes) do have a big signature which enables these tracking fitted/booster boosted titans (!) to hit subcaps at all. Aditionally, these perma mwding drakes also have a very big signature from their mwd-> easy to hit for titans. So there is a reason why these titans are effective at all.

You have to take on compromisses with Titans to kill supportfleets and have to put them into great danger of being lost.

Some entities made wrong decisions by not using their recources in the past to build a suiting fleet for their upcomming enemy. There never was a doubt how many Titans and Motherships are around and could be fielded against them. That these ships would knock on their door one day was expectable. Now these entities shoud should have to deal with their decissions they made in the past.

At least if this is a sandbox, where your decision matters and can have an influence on the entire universe. The ballance is fine.


they kill hurricanes with mwd off really easy, because in this game there is always going to be an chance to apply all 10k dps

cost is never an excuse
Kyle Myr
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#168 - 2012-03-27 18:24:36 UTC
Kaj'Schak wrote:
There is also the question, if you field 50 Ships worth 70b each, you should be somehow able to vaporize an enemy fleet, that has only the value of one or two of these ships


Isk value is entirely irrelevant given the ease with which money is made in EVE, and everyone is well aware of this. Otherwise, there would be more broad complaints about the capabilities of Tech 3 Cruisers.
Caneb
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#169 - 2012-03-27 18:37:23 UTC
Kaj'Schak wrote:

Titans that are fitted for rapes, are not fitted to max tank. So they are realativly vuernable

No they're not, because a supercap fleet always has alternate fittings in the cargo and a bunch of supercarriers nearby.

Again, the problem isn't single titans. A single titan is vulnerable and an insignificant threat to a subcap fleet. The issue is large groups of titans supported by supercarriers, a doctrine which scales far beyond their numbers.

If a serious threat to the fleet appears, the titans will simply use the carriers to refit into a max tank fit. When there is no threat, they can fit for maximum damage, tracking and scan res.
NimBetu Cayal
The Vorlon Empire
#170 - 2012-03-27 18:40:03 UTC
CCP Greyscale wrote:

This has a decent chance of being a good long-term fix (we'd have to think about it some more), but it's too large in scope for this release, unfortunately.


Capitals is the only means a smaller entity has to deal whit a much larger Blobb.
The war in the north has showen us that a 200 man fleet can defend agains a 400 man fleet.

As an example:
Raiden. has used Titans Successfully Couse Goonswarm was unable or unwilling to change there tactics.

They then field many Large Sig radius ships like Maelstroms or Drakes Permarunning MWDs.
In addition to that there are many expamples that show us (read youtube recordings) that The Goon fleet is not even trying to have a high angular velocity.

Why did they not just bring Ahacs or Tengus whit low sig? Then titans would not have tracked them at all, unelss they where sitting still. Almost seems like the goon leaders are trying to make this a bigger problem then it really is.
Isnt EVE all about adapiting to the enemy fleet? Countering it and overcome the obstical.
Seems more like Goons try to whine change the game so they don't have to change tactics.
Might be cause they have so many players that has skilled directly for the Alpha Maelstrom. i dont know.

I think the Proposed Change you poste on page one Mr. CCP Greyscale is a accaptable one.
Important to keep in mind that Titans are 100Bill ISK ships and whit out them the largest blobb would always win.
EnderCapitalG
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#171 - 2012-03-27 18:42:02 UTC
Also, CCP Greyscale, since you've not replied I've taken this chance to produce 2 more graphs for you.

These are without MWD on, as all the others have had the MWD on for the target Maelstrom.

With webs: http://i.imgur.com/Meg3i.png

Without: http://i.imgur.com/2ez3h.png
EnderCapitalG
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#172 - 2012-03-27 18:43:26 UTC
NimBetu Cayal wrote:
I do not understand how the tracking formula works..


Incorrect. At any time one of those Tengus or Armor HACs will end up with 0 transversal and get blapped just the same as any other ship.

Please stop posting fiction as fact, thank you.
Dungar's Sister
Never Ignorant Gettin' Goals Accomplished
Gimme Da Loot
#173 - 2012-03-27 18:45:30 UTC
NimBetu Cayal wrote:
[quote=CCP Greyscale]
Important to keep in mind that Titans are 100Bill ISK ships and whit out them the largest blobb would always win.


Important to keep in mind that costs rise exponentially as you increase between hull sizes and the power curve does not.
Akelorian
FinFleet
Northern Coalition.
#174 - 2012-03-27 18:45:34 UTC
EnderCapitalG wrote:
Also, CCP Greyscale, since you've not replied I've taken this chance to produce 2 more graphs for you.

These are without MWD on, as all the others have had the MWD on for the target Maelstrom.

With webs: http://i.imgur.com/Meg3i.png

Without: http://i.imgur.com/2ez3h.png


because you fly a missile titan, knowing full well how horrible they are, you are trying to push for the rest of the titans to do the same. Please can you make your next graphs into pie charts?
Dungar's Sister
Never Ignorant Gettin' Goals Accomplished
Gimme Da Loot
#175 - 2012-03-27 18:46:56 UTC
Akelorian wrote:
EnderCapitalG wrote:
Also, CCP Greyscale, since you've not replied I've taken this chance to produce 2 more graphs for you.

These are without MWD on, as all the others have had the MWD on for the target Maelstrom.

With webs: http://i.imgur.com/Meg3i.png

Without: http://i.imgur.com/2ez3h.png


because you fly a missile titan, knowing full well how horrible they are, you are trying to push for the rest of the titans to do the same. Please can you make your next graphs into pie charts?

"Please don't nerf my titan it's the only thing I have in life that makes me feel special"
Vatek
Rents Due Crew
#176 - 2012-03-27 18:47:44 UTC
Akelorian wrote:
EnderCapitalG wrote:
Also, CCP Greyscale, since you've not replied I've taken this chance to produce 2 more graphs for you.

These are without MWD on, as all the others have had the MWD on for the target Maelstrom.

With webs: http://i.imgur.com/Meg3i.png

Without: http://i.imgur.com/2ez3h.png


because you fly a missile titan, knowing full well how horrible they are, you are trying to push for the rest of the titans to do the same. Please can you make your next graphs into pie charts?


By horrible, you mean "not able to blap".
EnderCapitalG
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#177 - 2012-03-27 18:48:57 UTC
Akelorian wrote:
EnderCapitalG wrote:
Also, CCP Greyscale, since you've not replied I've taken this chance to produce 2 more graphs for you.

These are without MWD on, as all the others have had the MWD on for the target Maelstrom.

With webs: http://i.imgur.com/Meg3i.png

Without: http://i.imgur.com/2ez3h.png


because you fly a missile titan, knowing full well how horrible they are, you are trying to push for the rest of the titans to do the same. Please can you make your next graphs into pie charts?


Horrible in this case means "unable to blap subcapitals".

I apologize, but Titans shouldn't be able to do that, ever.
Ivana Twinkle
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#178 - 2012-03-27 18:49:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Ivana Twinkle
Akelorian wrote:
EnderCapitalG wrote:
Also, CCP Greyscale, since you've not replied I've taken this chance to produce 2 more graphs for you.

These are without MWD on, as all the others have had the MWD on for the target Maelstrom.

With webs: http://i.imgur.com/Meg3i.png

Without: http://i.imgur.com/2ez3h.png


because you fly a missile titan, knowing full well how horrible they are, you are trying to push for the rest of the titans to do the same. Please can you make your next graphs into pie charts?


I take it you havent read the thread where these graphs was requested by greyscale
Castelo Selva
Forcas armadas
Brave Collective
#179 - 2012-03-27 18:50:43 UTC
Dear CCP Greyscale:

Stop doing micro-management. Stop trying to small easy changes trying to fix Titans.
Titans are like this way for years, and some more months will not kill eve.

Instead, do the right thing. Leave Titans the way they are by now and do a big change. As many before me already said, make Titans a big logistic / support / reship / (insert here your fleet support idea) ship.
Titans should be that way long time ago, and now with your new project to design ship status by role, it is the right time to do it.

Do you not have the man-hours to do it right now? It is ok, just do it at the winter expansion and warning the player base about the new change. Of course that you will have an OMG ragequit reaction at fist, but be a man and do it for the nest of the eve universe. Be a brave man! Do it!

After all, that is the way CCP act when you really want it, like as weeks ago when you decide to delete a lot of collection items and are just ignoring the plead of the players (sarcasm and disappointment included at this paragraph).
Dungar's Sister
Never Ignorant Gettin' Goals Accomplished
Gimme Da Loot
#180 - 2012-03-27 18:54:05 UTC
Castelo Selva wrote:
Dear CCP Greyscale:

Stop doing micro-management. Stop trying to small easy changes trying to fix Titans.
Titans are like this way for years, and some more months will not kill eve.

Instead, do the right thing. Leave Titans the way they are by now and do a big change. As many before me already said, make Titans a big logistic / support / reship / (insert here your fleet support idea) ship.
Titans should be that way long time ago, and now with your new project to design ship status by role, it is the right time to do it.

Do you not have the man-hours to do it right now? It is ok, just do it at the winter expansion and warning the player base about the new change. Of course that you will have an OMG ragequit reaction at fist, but be a man and do it for the nest of the eve universe. Be a brave man! Do it!

Or they could fix them for the "Galaxy in flames" expansion so that wars aren't decided by who has the most titans.