These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

[Idea] Null sec system name changes

Author
Vitaliy001
Amarr Caldari Militia Coalition
#1 - 2011-09-21 22:57:06 UTC
If your alliance have Sov in a system you should be able to change it's name not just the stations inside, but the whole thing. I know the name changes will create navigation chaos that's why we suggest the real system name for example zlz, if you change the name to "Fluff" the name zlz will still stay just like you can name a ship a drake is still a drake. When you see your overview it would be "Fluff", if you info it it will say location name zlz and Sov name Fluff. Fluff will be seen as primary name that you see. Also name changes should be played for like a billion per name so they don't change every 5 minutes and give more incentives to debate on the name as well on Corp/alliance level. If anything the name changes can be done thru a vote in the alliance or Corp

I know i will fight for a named system I like and/or named more so than some number name given by the ccp no offense but they suck Ugh. For example. alliance "NYC" has Sov over 5 systems that they named Bronx, Brooklyn, Staten Island, Queens, and Manhattan. that Alliance will fight to the teeth for the 5 systems just cause of the personalization and it sounds like home not just some system with a number like a license plate. but just like license plates if you pay a little more you can have it customized to your preference.
ACEJRR
Redwind Trading Facility
#2 - 2011-09-21 23:30:36 UTC
This is a great idea any time u can make something personal it gets 10x better no one wants to lose a system they named for a reason
Herping yourDerp
Tribal Liberation Force
Minmatar Republic
#3 - 2011-09-22 00:12:43 UTC
a part of me wants it to happen, navigating null is a nightmare

"everyone align to 523-35k or w/e it is.... i rather it be " align to panda bear island"
Abdiel Kavash
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#4 - 2011-09-22 00:57:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Abdiel Kavash
I can't say I agree. Alliances would continuously rename their systems around to confuse the opposition.

Unless the system name was always displayed as "D2-HOS - Insert Custom System Name Here". Then it would be sort of cool.
Kalicor Lightwind
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#5 - 2011-09-22 06:00:16 UTC
Sounds good to me. It's quite a powerful thing to be able to name a system.
Vitaliy001
Amarr Caldari Militia Coalition
#6 - 2011-09-22 06:18:28 UTC
Abdiel Kavash wrote:
I can't say I agree. Alliances would continuously rename their systems around to confuse the opposition.

Unless the system name was always displayed as "D2-HOS - Insert Custom System Name Here". Then it would be sort of cool.


Perfect \o/
CaptainQuick
Havoc Violence and Chaos
#7 - 2011-09-22 06:38:15 UTC  |  Edited by: CaptainQuick
i really dont think it will truly happen due to fact then EVE would have to make all entire new maps each time a system is taken over for the maps being sold on website.....and also to comindate the ingame search as well which would pull a big draw on the assest server......

not to menthion good lord goons,test,and the other profound idiots out there would make ungodly names....which some could be against tos wouldnt that be nice get changed to a system name delve00001678548 due to a crackhead name the system some stupid name
Vitaliy001
Amarr Caldari Militia Coalition
#8 - 2011-09-22 06:46:11 UTC
CaptainQuick wrote:
i really dont think it will truly happen due to fact then EVE would have to make all entire new maps each time a system is taken over for the maps being sold on website.....and also to comindate the ingame search as well which would pull a big draw on the assest server......

not to menthion good lord goons,test,and the other profound idiots out there would make ungodly names....which some could be against tos wouldnt that be nice get changed to a system name delve00001678548 due to a crackhead name the system some stupid name


The maps stay the same and when you travel by let's say auto pilot you still set to base name exp: zlz, the customized name is just going to be added to its sort of say XYZ on the map name. As for custom the nameson top of its XYZ name, if you own it who cares, you can always change it as long as you gain sov over it and pay to change it
Vitaliy001
Amarr Caldari Militia Coalition
#9 - 2011-09-22 18:54:56 UTC  |  Edited by: Vitaliy001
Lol
Vitaliy001
Amarr Caldari Militia Coalition
#10 - 2011-09-22 18:55:33 UTC  |  Edited by: Vitaliy001
I have noticed people stay in high sec for name reasons too like even myself who constantly stay in Jita, Mani, Amarr, and so on just cause of the name sake. On top of that people know right away where these systems are just by name. It's also harder to remember and be comfy with number for a system. Even in real life explorers didn't name land like mountain range 1, 2, and 3. They called it California, Colorado,........
Omega Flames
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#11 - 2011-09-23 20:28:21 UTC
This is a really bad idea. 1st changing the system name is already going to make it confusing as to where it is you want to travel to. Even if you keep the original name in it you are just making 1 system have 2 names. That is going to confuse the crap out of anyone cause they will have to remember both names for the system still. Also there is a way to "name" your system. Build an outpost and name it. then just simply link the station like you do systems and have every set their ap to it.
Omega Flames
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#12 - 2011-09-23 20:35:49 UTC
Vitaliy001 wrote:
I have noticed people stay in high sec for name reasons too like even myself who constantly stay in Jita, Mani, Amarr, and so on just cause of the name sake. On top of that people know right away where these systems are just by name. It's also harder to remember and be comfy with number for a system. Even in real life explorers didn't name land like mountain range 1, 2, and 3. They called it California, Colorado,........

no one stays in jita or amarr cause of thier name, they stay in them cause they have no life and cant imagine leaving the trade hub to explore the rest of the universe. The reason people know the name jita and amarr and etc is cause they are trade hubs. Everyone in the prov region knows about 9uy cause its a trade hub, just like everyone who lives in some other null region knows the name of their hubs. Also the null systems are relatively uncolonized areas in comparision to empire and they arent named 1,2,3. Yes i understand they have a random alphanumeric name to them but at the same time if you live/operate in the area you have np learning the names, its only those who arent from that area who dont know where the systems are. if you took someone who had never been to the forge and told them you are going to some random system 2 jumps from jita well ofc they arent going to know wtf you are talking about cause they havent operated in that area.
Vitaliy001
Amarr Caldari Militia Coalition
#13 - 2011-09-23 21:16:02 UTC
I doubt it's going to be confusing once you are used to it trust me, it's just like when they added incursions with fear that people can't play together to fight NPCs on a large scale and yet it happened with good reviews. People were skeptical at first but then it grew on them and many of the players like it. And theres nothing wrong with having a location name with a custom name in one, I mean how confusing can it get I'm sure you are not dumb and can read. I don't get the fear of naming systems and have a little bit of pride in having to name them and inspire patriotism to your systems. I can only imagine how much more effort players would put in on that principle alone to keep their sovereignty and the names of their systems
Joe Risalo
State War Academy
Caldari State
#14 - 2011-09-23 21:35:06 UTC
Omega Flames wrote:
This is a really bad idea. 1st changing the system name is already going to make it confusing as to where it is you want to travel to. Even if you keep the original name in it you are just making 1 system have 2 names. That is going to confuse the crap out of anyone cause they will have to remember both names for the system still. Also there is a way to "name" your system. Build an outpost and name it. then just simply link the station like you do systems and have every set their ap to it.


Actually, it would be quite nice...

Example

The name of the system is z-14, and you want to change name to Joe's campgrounds.

well, the name would be displayed as

z-14: Joe's Campgrounds.

Perhaps instead of changing the names, you just simply add a hidden name to it that only people in your alliance can see.

lets say ya'll have z-14 as the alliances main trade hub.

Well, then you could set the name to

z-14: Poop Flinger's trade hub

and only your alliance would be able to see that tag. That way it's not beneficial info displayed for your enemies, but make navigation easier for the alliance members.
Barbara Nichole
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#15 - 2011-09-23 23:41:31 UTC
I don't like the idea that system names would change at all. You can already change the names ot outposts you capture; this should be enough to satisfy those who want to name something fixed on the map. Don't have an outpost? capture one .. or build one.

  - remove the cloaked from local; free intel is the real problem, not  "afk" cloaking -

[IMG]http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a208/DawnFrostbringer/consultsig.jpg[/IMG]

Vitaliy001
Amarr Caldari Militia Coalition
#16 - 2011-09-24 08:45:58 UTC
Barbara Nichole wrote:
I don't like the idea that system names would change at all. You can already change the names ot outposts you capture; this should be enough to satisfy those who want to name something fixed on the map. Don't have an outpost? capture one .. or build one.


Ok you can do that to stations too, great. But we are talking about something bigger than that like the name your you actual territory not some base or structure in it, C'mon being conservative to the game doesn't create progress
Seraph Minayin
Accounts Payable.
#17 - 2011-09-24 20:03:39 UTC
I quite like this idea actually, I think personalistion should play a much larger part in EVE and this sounds brilliant.

I'm not so sure about a price to limit it, maybe a time limit instead, say around once per month OR once Sov has changed? That would make it a much bigger decision for an alliance than a billion ISK, most of the larger alliances make that easily every few hours.

But I'm totally for this idea, sounds awesome :D

Lemming Fleet - First Admiral

Laechyd Eldgorn
Avanto
Hole Control
#18 - 2011-09-24 22:46:46 UTC
no

4-cum5
ei-000
ccp-us

etc.

do you think players will come up with better names? i think not.

it will look something like

3-peen
8-008Z
Vitaliy001
Amarr Caldari Militia Coalition
#19 - 2011-09-24 23:13:13 UTC
Laechyd Eldgorn wrote:
no

4-cum5
ei-000
ccp-us

etc.

do you think players will come up with better names? i think not.

it will look something like

3-peen
8-008Z


I say players will name them just fine, but that's not the issue is it? The names will have meaning to those who gave it and that's what is important. As for profanity I'm sure CCP will police names the same way your char name is or how you name your Corp/alliance (does not bother me at all). Last time I checked if you play EVE you see all sorts of names good, bad, and even straight up offensive. I like it that way it gives the game life and keeps it going
Oh and as for me personally calling a system for example hpt-89 I'll name it hpt-89(Coney Island) I doubt its as horrible of a name as you make it seem. it might not be in that format and I hope if this idea goes thru CCP will come up with a good way to represent names without the "( )"
You know make it nice Big smile
Homo Erectus
Evolution
Northern Coalition.
#20 - 2011-09-26 04:17:06 UTC
POSTING BECAUSE VITALIY CONVINCED ME IN LOCAL. I WOULD LIKE A SYSTEM CALLED HOMO.
12Next page